|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 21st, 2010, 05:56 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that when I assessed these cameras myself, I noticed something. When you price out your SDI enabled fixed lens choices (XF305 vs EX1R), you have to normalize the pricing to include 16GB of recording media because unlike the EX3, the EX1R DOES come with media: a Sony Pro 16GB SxS (good stuff). According to B&H, XF305 is on Preorder but based on the XF300 packaging, the XF does not include media. B&H shows a 16GB Sandisk Pro CF on sale for $175US and non-Pro for $125US. YMMV
|
July 21st, 2010, 06:15 AM | #17 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Selby UK
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
Quote:
The AG-AF100 certainly looks interesting, but it would need a Nanoflash too since it's maximum is 24Mbps, wonder how much the camera will cost when it's released... I'm definitely leaning heavily towards the EX3 at the moment. Les: Do you think a better version of the APS-C sensors might come out soon? What's bleeding edge? David: Thanks for the extra info on SxS - SDHC adaptors. Quote:
|
|||
July 21st, 2010, 07:22 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Yes, the SDHC based SxS cards give you the reliability of SxS and are much closer in cost to the expensive CF cards you need for these hi data rate (35mb and 50mb) applications. The XF is the first in this class of codec to use CF BTW so the reliability is undetermined. I've seen demos where an SxS card is yanked while recording and not a single bit of video was lost. I did that on my CF HDV camera and lost the whole 2GB segment. I don't know if Canon has done anything to make the CF cards as reliable as SxS.
When I said APS-C I meant the new family of large sensor camcorders like the Sony and Panny I mentioned. Canon may have one too but their strategy has been to be the last ones in the market segment. I think the APS-C sensor cameras are single chip FWIW. Bleeding Edge is a pun on Leading Edge aka buying into the first generation large sensors. While you get to be first on the block, it's joked that you pay for that in blood (problems, glitches, top dollar pricing etc). Last edited by Les Wilson; July 21st, 2010 at 08:32 AM. Reason: clarified CF statement. |
July 21st, 2010, 08:08 AM | #19 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
There is nothing wrong with the camera you own, and there have been many professional productions shot with the XH-A1. If you need a better viewfinder to make focusing easier, then purchase a proper monitor which can be used with any camera you might choose to use. Bottom line, there are so many other places to spend your hard earned cash which will have a more significant impact on your productions that buying a new camera. And in most cases, rentals make the most sense when you get to that level. All the Best! |
|
July 21st, 2010, 08:29 AM | #20 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Quote:
However, I do empathize with wanting to move to something with better low light sensitivity, DOF, file based workflow, and get some ergonomic improvements like hi-res LCD/VF, full stop rings and a few others. |
|
July 21st, 2010, 10:01 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Selby UK
Posts: 274
|
Hey guys
Hopefully I've got what it takes... I'm currently engrossed in several books on cinematography and directing and scriptwriting... find it hard to have time to keep up with the latest cameras and stuff in between editing, planning, full-time job, etc, etc... If I haven't got what it takes, it's not that important to me - as long as I can keep making films. I put so much work into my films I just find the compression artefacts a real shame. Every time I watch the films I've made I see the artefacts, not to mention the dodgy HDV color, and think I wish I'd recorded in a better format. There's also the issue of how difficult it is to execute focus pulls while dollying, getting smooth zooms, etc, etc... The lower bitrate HDV format also means I can't do the shots I want because if the camera pans or moves on the dolly any faster than really really really slow to follow action I get nasty tearing in the image. But no action is really that slow and it's really limiting. One other advantage to upgrading my camera is that at least my films might reach a wider audience on a satellite channel or suchlike and I can try to get back some money for future films. David: Good thinking, I've never really looked into rental before, I have no idea how expensive rental is for cameras like the EX3. At the moment my filming is all done at weekends (usually 7-8 weekends in a row) so it's a bit awkward to pick up and drop off equipment each weekend. The nearest rental place is about 30 miles away as well. But I'll look into getting some rental prices. Les: maybe it's best for both of us to wait until the big APS-C sensor bleeding edge cameras have been replaced with cameras with a slightly blunted edge and then invest... or invest in chainmail gloves... hmm... |
July 21st, 2010, 12:14 PM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Most rental houses have special weekend rates that will save you money.
Use the money you save renting vs purchase to hire a pro audio person and grip truck w/gaffer. The key is really surrounding yourself with the best team you can assemble. Good Luck! |
July 21st, 2010, 12:30 PM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Stuart, I am really beginning to wonder whether you may not have got some other problem which you're blaming on HDV and compression. HDV is not a broadcast codec, but it's not THAT bad - most of the time you are hard put to see any problems. To put it in perspective, it's arguably better than the standard used for broadcast HD TV transmission - when BBC HD was MPEG2 I believe it was around 19Mbs, subsampled to 1440, 4:2:0 colour sampling. (It's now an even lower bitrate, but using H264.) You may have been able to see the odd artifact - but "....the artefacts, not to mention the dodgy HDV color...." and ".....if the camera pans or moves on the dolly any faster than really really really slow to follow action I get nasty tearing in the image....." ?
Excuse me? That sounds worse than the cheapest consumer camera at very low bitrate AVC-HD. It sounds vastly worse than any HDV camera should be, and certainly an XH-A1 - I think your problem may be something other than HDV. In what way do you consider HDV colour "dodgy"? |
July 21st, 2010, 01:02 PM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Stuart, further to David Heath's comments, maybe you could post s short clip of what you've done. That may help to determine if what you are seeing is a result of the HDV Codec or some other factors.
I use to shoot with an XL H1a and XH A1 and did some independent shorts with them. Given the correct setup both cameras could produce very good pictures. Whip pans were a no no but you could pan at a reasonable rate an not see the effects you are mentioning. With the footage from those two cameras the first thing I would do is to transcode into CinForm intermediate prior to doing any post work. If you do use heavy color correction on HDV files they will exhibit some pretty nasty artifacts. I currently shoot with an EX3 and nanoFlash. This combination, especially shooting at I-Frame only 180Mbps or higher yields some truly stunning results. This is my personal set up and if a producer were to want anything higher I would rent as the cost of investing in a higher end rig is not justified for most independent shooters. I've had some of the projects I've worked on shown in local theaters as well as broadcast over local cable and with the EX even using native files (not from the nanoFlash), the final product is pretty impressive. A word of caution though. You did hit it onto an aspect most people going into these cameras don't anticipate. That is the higher cost of accessories. Batteries, for example, are much more expensive, You'll need a good tripod also. As for your critical focus, nothing beats a good HD monitor. I can focus decently through the EX3's VF when I'm handheld but if I'm on sticks I always have my monitor going to aide in focusing. Garrett |
July 22nd, 2010, 07:56 AM | #25 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,060
|
One of the things I absolutely love about my Sony V1U is that it has a HDMI port with the video signal at full HD resolution direct off the sensor block. Industry people have dropped their jaws when they see the quality of the image that comes out of that connection. Much better than HDV.
All I need is a unit that records from a HDMI input and I've essentially got myself a codec upgrade without having to purchase a new camera. Andrew |
July 22nd, 2010, 09:22 AM | #26 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Limiting factor being the 1/4-inch CMOS Sensor.
|
July 22nd, 2010, 09:24 AM | #27 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,060
|
True, true.
But just think of that beautiful 20x optical zoom you get. :-) Andrew |
July 22nd, 2010, 02:49 PM | #28 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,048
|
Good afternoon,
there are a number of cameras out there that can out put full resolution via an hdmi port!! An hdmi recording device other than a lap top would make them outstanding choices!!!
__________________
DATS ALL FOLKS Dale W. Guthormsen |
July 27th, 2010, 05:56 AM | #29 | |||||
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Selby UK
Posts: 274
|
Thanks for all the help and replies guys!
Quote:
Would you need a Nanoflash to record to or do you mean the sort of HDMI recorders you get for recording hi-def television? Do you do this yourself and what camera do you use for it? Quote:
Quote:
That's a good idea to get a decent monitor to aid focusing. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
July 27th, 2010, 06:16 PM | #30 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,060
|
Hi Stuart,
I'm still recording to tape. But at least I have this option available in the future, should tape become rare. Andrew |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|