![]()  | 
	
		
 Neat Video vs. Magic Bullet Denoiser 
		
		
		Anyone have a preference between the two that has used both?  Also, Neat is available for both Premiere and After Effects.  Which is the ideal platform?  I would imagine Premiere, as that's where I spend the bulk of editing time, unless I'm overlooking something. 
	 | 
		
 I use Neat on PPro. I believe, though, that once you buy a license you can use it on both PPro and After Effects. I haven't had a need to use it on After Effects so I can't answer for sure. 
	Neat has radically improved their process over the last year. A year ago I remember battling with finding a frame having a sufficient blank space to get my noise profile from. The updated version makes it clean and simple. You know right away if the frame selected will give you a good profile or not. I'm still using CS3 so I only have been using the 32-bit version. I am runnning a dual-boot configuration with Win7 and CS5 installed but am waiting to swap out video cards for an MPE qualifying Nvidea card. I use Matrox RT.X2 which has not released its drivers for CS5 yet. I am hoping that in CS5 with a high performance Nvidea card and the 64-bit version of Neat installed, that the crank times will go down radically. In CS3 a simple timeline can crank for hours with the Neat denoise effect added.  | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:04 AM. | 
	DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
	
	1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network