|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 18th, 2005, 02:35 PM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Strzelce Krajeńskie, Poland
Posts: 5
|
Interesting dropped frames issue
Okay.
This may seem a little weird (because it is), but try to keep up : I've got the 3-port VIA OHCI IEEE1394 PCI Controller Card. The ports will be later mentioned as "left one", "middle one", and "right one". The thing is - I had my camcorder plugged in the left port, and it captured fine (3 dropped frames while capturing 600 frame footage - that's IMO too much anyway) under Windows XP. Switched to Windows 98, 0 dropped frames. Plugged the thingy into the middle port, ~150 dropped frames while capturing 600 frame footage under Windows XP. Switched to Windows 98, 0 dropped frames. Plugged the thingy into the right port, ~400 dropped frames while capturing 600 frame footage under Windows XP. Switched to Windows 98, 0 dropped frames. I know that this may be a stupid issue, but it really bothers me when I want to edit my video in all the editing programs...A/V out of sync, scenes missing and such... The footage was captured from the same tape. My computer config is AMD Athlon XP 1700+ with 256MB of DDR-SDRAM (@266MHz), the capturing-harddrive (Maxtor 6Y160P0) is 7200RPM and proofed transfer (used HDTach) about 42MB/s. I'm capturing in WinDV. Thank you in advance for any replies. -X |
|
|
|
August 18th, 2005, 10:12 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ontario
Posts: 445
|
for XP 256mb is too light.It can work but alot of tweaking is necessary because XP uses a load of ram it's self.win98 se needs considerably less ram .
So, Much easier to bump your ram to 512 or 1g than trace all the tweaks |
|
|
|
|
August 19th, 2005, 01:12 AM
|
#3 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Strzelce Krajeńskie, Poland
Posts: 5
|
Thought so from the beginning.
Thanks very much. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
