Is "native ISO" a slippery concept? at
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Open DV Discussion
For topics which don't fit into any of the other categories.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 9th, 2015, 04:43 PM   #1
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,149
Is "native ISO" a slippery concept?

So, the Varicam 35 is said to have "dual native ISOs" because "there are two analog circuits right after each pixel before the gain amp, one each dedicated to 800 and 5000 ISO": News Shooter | Panasonic Varicam 35 has a dual native ISO of 800 and 5000 – how do they do it?.

Meanwhile, people using the 5DMkIII are advised that 100, 200, 400, 800 are the "native ISOs" because they're "the settings that are derived from analog gain rather than digital exposure compensation": Canon HD DSLR “Native ISO” Shootin' The Shot.

But surely these are contradictory uses of the term?

What does "native ISO" actually mean? (Or what should it mean?)

Follow-up question: if shooting at higher than native ISO degrades the image because you're digitally boosting it, is there a disadvantage to shooting lower than native ISO, where presumably you're digitally darkening it? Would you always lose dynamic range?
Adrian Tan is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2019 The Digital Video Information Network