Confused: What is the current CONSUMER camcorder recommendation? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Open DV Discussion
For topics which don't fit into any of the other categories.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 24th, 2006, 04:20 PM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
Confused: What is the current CONSUMER camcorder recommendation?

I've been asked by two friends lately. However, when looking at consumer cameras things seem very confused:
  • Some high end units are dropped: Canon Optura, Panny GS400. What are the good consumer cameras?
  • DVD and hard drive cameras using MPEG2 seem to have replaced DV to tape, both in the product line and consumers minds. At the highest resolution recording times are short. How does the quality compare to DV?
  • Using solid state memory, like the Panny SDR-S150, seems very limited. Isn't it as good as the others?
  • While HDV seems to have a difficult workflow, the AVCHD from Sony seems to have part of the workflow missing. What can a consumer really do with an AVCHD file?
  • With DVD cameras, it seems the video is divided into little 20 minutes segments. Is that true?
  • With hard disks and SD memory cameras there seems to be no archival in the work flow. DVDs are too small. Hard disks would quickly be used up. What is the solution?

Is the Canon HV10 sort of in its own class now?

Thanks,

David
David Ziegelheim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2006, 04:28 PM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington, NorthWest USA
Posts: 788
Now, I don't know what kind of answer you are looking for. But if you want a specific model, I would say the Elura 100. IMHO, it has better picture then a GL1, lots of manual controls, very user friendly, and is dirt cheap ($300).

I have this camera, and it is the best thing I have ever touched (thats not saying much, but I'll say it anyways). It takes still, its very small and light, I think it only ways about 9 oz. Very nice to hold, and long battery.

I hope I helped.
~Gabriel
__________________
Gabriel Photography
Gabriel Yeager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 25th, 2006, 02:06 PM   #3
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
It's a common question

David, this is a common question lately - I get it as well about once a month. It is truely confusing for the average person to make a good decision with all the variety of camcorders available on the market. Certainly, every format has its own advantages and disadvantages. Having tried to deliver DVDs from different sources myself, I made up my mind and this is what I recommend to those looking into buying a camcorder:

1. If you intend to edit your footage and you need to deliver the final product on a variety of media forms (DVD, CD, web), your best option is miniDV. Both Mac and Windows have a good workflow for editing DV-AVI and to encode it into pretty much any compressed (more compressed I should say) format.

2. If you need to have the final product ready at the end of your filming, or all you need is an unedited DVD, go for a DVD or hard media camcorder. There is no good known (at least known to me) workflow for decompressing MPEG files in order to make them into something else.

I hope this helps,
__________________
Ervin Farkas
www.AtlantaLegalVideo.com
Ervin Farkas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 25th, 2006, 07:15 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
However, it is worse than that. It seems that most manufacturers are starting to or already have dropped their high-end miniDV cameras.

And that is sort of the problem. The interaction of recording media, recording format, editing tools and the cameras available seems to be much more problematic than 2-3 years ago.

Even with the straight to DVD option, there are quality issues and those are small DVDs. Many people are used to 2 hours on a DVD...much longer and higher quality than the straight to DVD option.

David
David Ziegelheim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 01:31 PM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsborough, NC, USA
Posts: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Ziegelheim
However, it is worse than that. It seems that most manufacturers are starting to or already have dropped their high-end miniDV cameras.
Many of the newer HDV high-end cameras also support miniDV (SD) and (for Sony) DVCAM. So, in a way, high-end miniDV still exists - just with added electronics to support recording HDV....(some pre-HDV cams already had CCDs with the necessary resolution but could only be used for still imaging to flash memory etc).
John Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 02:51 PM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
Yes...however for Canon that is only the HV10 without audio input, and for Sony its the HC3 at a hefty $1200, or $1100 for a grey market unit with a B&H warranty.

There used to be several Canons, Sonys, and Pannys in the $800-1000 range. Are you saying the HC3 or HV10 are the only real choices?
David Ziegelheim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 03:19 PM   #7
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
Have you checked out the Panasonic GS line ?

See, for instance, GS500 below:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=10&Submit.y=5
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos
Chris Barcellos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 08:46 PM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 227
Don't bank on HDR-HC3

Even though the HC3 has been out less than a year and seems inferior to my trusty HDR-HC1, it would appear the HC3 has already been discontinued. It has disappeared from SonyStyle.com. I hope there is an DVtape/HDV camera to replace it that isn't $3500!
Don Blish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 09:37 PM   #9
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
I agree! I want DV-AVI, manual focus, mic input, headphone out, and exposure control. I can't find a consumer MiniDV with the featue set above. I am curious about what John F Miller said about SD on the new HDV cameras. What are the record times on a hard drive model (for example?)
Colin Sato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 10:50 PM   #10
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
We had a nice simple system...MiniDV via Firewire to disk, supported by all editing programs, then MPEG2 to DVD or one of the lower res computer outputs. Once editing support was available, HDV was only a small twist on that.

The Sony HDR-SR1 records SD in 3, 6, or 9 Mb/sec MPEG2 with 7 to 20 hr record times. No idea about the quality.

It would have been nice if the AVCHD and MPEG2 was at 25Mb/sec and the hard disk was removeable. However they aren't.

That is interesting about the HC3 being gone from the site. I wonder if the A1U is about to follow.

Chris, the GS500 generally gets so-so reviews, and the Canon has dropped all their high-end DV stuff.

If only the HV10 had audio input and audio gain control.
David Ziegelheim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 11:26 PM   #11
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
Dave:

I have GS120. Not a VX2100, of course, but a small package, with decent picture. I assumed 500 over 120 would be quite an improvement.

Looks like use VX or GL might be what you are looking for.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos
Chris Barcellos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 26th, 2006, 11:40 PM   #12
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Barcellos
Dave:

I have GS120. Not a VX2100, of course, but a small package, with decent picture. I assumed 500 over 120 would be quite an improvement.

Looks like use VX or GL might be what you are looking for.
Not for me...for people who keep asking me...

I'm more an A1/V1 class of camera.
David Ziegelheim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 29th, 2006, 09:03 AM   #13
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 235
I'd also like to get a new MiniDV cam, but I need headphones and mic inputs. What are my options? Do I need to "pony-up" and get an HDV unit?

Thanks...
__________________
dB
Dan Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30th, 2006, 09:35 AM   #14
Obstreperous Rex
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 27,366
Images: 513
Dan, there are a number of current consumer camcorders that have what you're looking for. One of them is the Canon Elura 100. It has a mic input jack and an a shoe for attaching a mic holder. The A/V output jack can be configured in the menu to function as a headphone jack to monitor audio while shooting. And it's a top-loader.
__________________
CH

Search DV Info Net | 20 years of DVi | ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!
Chris Hurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 30th, 2006, 09:21 PM   #15
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 235
Thanks for the info Chris. I keep hearing good things about the Elura, I need to go handle one and see for myself.
__________________
dB
Dan Brown is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network