|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 1st, 2013, 02:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Conway, NH
Posts: 574
|
44 MB/s or 176 MB/s I-frame?
I'm about to hack my GH2 and, unless I'm mistaken, I can't add both the 44 MB/s improvement and the 176Mbit I-frame improvement on the same camera. If that is the case, do you feel the 176MBit I-frame hack is much better than the 44 MBit? How reliable are these?
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2013, 07:05 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 700
|
Re: 44 MB/s or 176 MB/s I-frame?
FlowMotion (v2.02?) is my general preference. It includes a 50Mbps 24L setting and 100Mbps 24H setting, and both are dead reliable (spanning, 80% VFR, etc) with the most moderately decent cards (ie Transcend Class 10)
I haven't had much use for the 150+Mbps patches |
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2013, 07:24 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 304
|
Re: 44 MB/s or 176 MB/s I-frame?
I use the Vanilla 44mb/s and have a few issues recording complex scenes like fast running water despite using a Sandisk 95mbs card.
The pictures at 44mbs are stunning and stable otherwise. I personally wouldn't use the higher hack as I feel there are stability issues, plus editing flow issues, plus the fact that unless you are shooting big screen TVC's or features there is no need for that resolution in your final product. |
|
|
|
|
February 4th, 2013, 04:01 PM
|
#4 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
Re: 44 MB/s or 176 MB/s I-frame?
i love GopStoppa, no any issues, except for the 8min clip limit and you need 95Mbps card,
but the quality is amazing, sometimes you can't tell where is what:)
__________________
I love this place! |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
