|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 7th, 2008, 09:07 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Conway, NH
Posts: 574
|
HVX200a vs HVX200: does anyone have any comparison images?
Does anyone have any images of noise level comparisons between the two units they could post here?
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2008, 08:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
Better than Halle Berry
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 435
|
Haven't got any side by side but it's pretty substantially cleaner. Not sure if it's worth trading up 200 for 200a but if you are thinking of going one or the other, definitely go 200A.
Noah |
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2008, 08:17 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Conway, NH
Posts: 574
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2008, 04:41 PM
|
#4 |
|
Go Go Godzilla
|
If you do a search, Barry Green posted a very detailed article on the 200/200a with samples from both cameras - I think the thread originated on another forum. But search for it here and you'll find his article.
In brief: the 200a probably adds 1 to 1.5 stops of light sensitivity and the color rendition is much more natural. The HPX170 is using the exact same chipset so it's imagery will be identical.
__________________
Robert Lane Producer/Creator - Bike Pilots TV |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
