|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 2nd, 2011, 05:15 AM | #46 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
Yes 50fps for slow-mo although I could always use the HPX301 for that if needed, I really like the 3100 and it may be my next camera if they don't do a 601 ;0)
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
March 2nd, 2011, 05:37 AM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 590
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
What is a 601 :) ?
|
March 2nd, 2011, 01:14 PM | #48 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
Shhh I've been speculating on the 601 for nearly two years now, it is a sub £20k inc lens replacement for the HPX500 with 2/3" chips and AVC Intra 100 with vari-speed but it only exists in my own mind!
Basically a 2/3" chipped HPX300/301 but I can always dream as the 3100 seems to be their answer to the sony 320/350 and 500!
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
March 2nd, 2011, 06:40 PM | #49 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 590
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
Yeah the 3100 looks very good value.. except for 50p/60p.. it has everything.. Ive used the 3700 also.. nice camera ofcourse.. but big.. and a real battery eater.. I will never need 5 card slots either..
Hope they will be quick to come out with thunderbolt port card reader..! |
March 3rd, 2011, 06:38 AM | #50 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
Quote:
Both the 3100 and the 3700 have full 1920x1080 imagers, and give a 1080 output - but no 720 downconversion. This is a very big reason why a lot of people are turning to the PMW500. It has 1920x1080 chips, will give a true 1080 output at normal speed, but crucially also has a 720p downconverted mode which will allow full slo-mo at 720p. It you want a Panasonic camera to do slo-mo you have to use the 2700 in 720p mode - but that only has 1280x720 chips, so the 1080 output is an upconvert. |
|
March 21st, 2011, 01:47 PM | #51 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Foster City, California
Posts: 192
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
If I was spending $25K for a camera body, it wouldn't be on a PMW-500 with 8-bit internal codec.
Panasonic offers two very attractive $20K camera body solutions--HPX2700 P2 Varicam and HPX3100. Both have 10-bit in-board codecs and Panasonic look, P2 robustness, proven workflow and myriad of accessories options. At this point, 8-bit recording belongs in sub-$10K cameras, not $25K + cameras, IMO. |
March 21st, 2011, 03:20 PM | #52 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 191
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
At least for 1080 shooting i really can`t see why anyone would buy PMW-500 over HPX3100, considering image quality on paper. The 3100 also is considerably cheaper...
But Panasonic should have included a proper 720p mode, for some users that important. Or maybe we will see 1080p50/60 camera soon? |
March 21st, 2011, 04:32 PM | #53 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Foster City, California
Posts: 192
|
Re: 370 doesn't meet PBS requirements?
Quote:
The 2700 shoots in 1080 for those wanting that delivery format, and does so better than an HDX900. For those that must have 1080X1920 native sensors, the 3100 is a bargain with its studio quality codec. |
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|