HVX200 lux rating at DVinfo.net

Ronald Lee · November 15th, 2005, 07:02 PM

Just wondering if anyone has any numbers?

Brian Broz · November 17th, 2005, 01:24 AM

Ronald,
All I know is the camera is "approximated" to be 1 stop better in low light than the Sony FX-1/Z1U.
No guarantees at this point (of course) but that's impressive to say the least. The real catch is the Z1U at 6+ db of gain is equivalent to the DVX100A at 0db...however the HVX appears to have solved the low light noise (admittedly minor) isssue....as has the DVX100B.
FWIW,

Brian Broz

Bill Edmunds · November 26th, 2005, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Broz

All I know is the camera is "approximated" to be 1 stop better in low light than the Sony FX-1/Z1U.

I've heard this on various forums as well, but where is the information coming from? Rumors or something more substantial?

Brian Broz · November 28th, 2005, 11:55 AM

I heard this from a Panasonic rep at IBC in September.
Certainly not written in stone, but from a reputable source.
Thanks,

BB

November 15th, 2005, 07:02 PM	#1
Ronald Lee Major Player Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 435	HVX200 lux rating Just wondering if anyone has any numbers?

November 17th, 2005, 01:24 AM	#2
Brian Broz Regular Crew Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 61	Ronald, All I know is the camera is "approximated" to be 1 stop better in low light than the Sony FX-1/Z1U. No guarantees at this point (of course) but that's impressive to say the least. The real catch is the Z1U at 6+ db of gain is equivalent to the DVX100A at 0db...however the HVX appears to have solved the low light noise (admittedly minor) isssue....as has the DVX100B. FWIW, Brian Broz

November 28th, 2005, 11:55 AM	#4
Brian Broz Regular Crew Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 61	I heard this from a Panasonic rep at IBC in September. Certainly not written in stone, but from a reputable source. Thanks, BB