November 10th, 2003, 04:33 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Plainfield, New Jersey
Posts: 927
|
Steady Tracker and Lighter Cams
Ok, I’ve heard that devices like the Steady Tracker aren’t too great for prosumer cams, but how are they with cameras that are under 2 pounds? Would a lighter cam work well with a device like the Steady Tracker? I was looking to use the Optura Xi (1.6 lbs.) with a Steady Tracker, how does that sound?
|
November 13th, 2003, 04:16 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
As long as....
you get some practice time in you should fare well. I've found that with some work on the foot work and turns my mono-pod tracker smooths out. It's a bitch if you have to work on a shot for long duration but...can't be helped sometimes.
Obviously, light weight cams allow longer time on track...you still get tired. Good technique and practice helps a lot. |
November 13th, 2003, 05:02 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I have a glidecam 2000 which I use with a Sony PDX-10 (~2 lbs, maybe less without the XLR box and mike). I think this makes good sense because the handheld stabilizers would be a real workout with a camera like a PD-150, and I can't even imagine using one with an XL-1s.
The only issue is that they are very tricky to balance. It took me literally hours to get this right, and you won't need very many of the included weights. It might be easier to fine tune the balance with more weights and a heavier camera. But the payoff will be that you can "keep it up" for much longer with a smaller cam. ;-) Let's see if Charles Papert chimes in on this. When I was asking around here awhile ago he was not a fan of the SteadyTracker because it doesn't have a gimbal (IIRC). |
November 17th, 2003, 05:26 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
They say the Flowpod is quicker/easier to balance than the other devices such as Steadicam JR. And it has a gimbal. Suppose to be solidly built.
|
November 17th, 2003, 05:51 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
"Let's see if Charles Papert chimes in on this. When I was asking around here awhile ago he was not a fan of the SteadyTracker because it doesn't have a gimbal"
Totally agree with him. You really need something with a true gimbal. There so still a lot unstability that still gets through which has strong influence on the sled while operating. You get better performance and funtional usage with a proper gimbal. Just my take. I'll let Charles take it from here...
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
November 17th, 2003, 12:50 PM | #6 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Eh. You guys said it all already.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
December 2nd, 2003, 01:09 AM | #7 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Chiming in late here - I have a vintage, mint Optura Pi headed my way. I want a stabilizer but wondered what is the lightest gimbal model on the market?
|
December 2nd, 2003, 10:19 AM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Hollywood Lite has a tiny little stabilizer with a "partial" gimbal. Check their website.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
December 2nd, 2003, 10:22 AM | #9 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Charles:
Thanks. I forgot about Hollywood Lite. I didn't realized they added to their product line. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|