![]() |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
i looked at this with some interest when it was announced, also looked at the CX 900 that's €1,699.00 on the Irish Sony site and they have the AX-100 for €2,249.01. Thats a bit spendy eh?
Its a nice enough system ok, dont like the lens cap even though it's the same as all my stills cameras! The only thing i could see it being an advantage for me at present would be the ability to crop into the image, then my Canon 5D MkIII should be able to crop even deeper still. So for me at the moment - I'm out. Will revisit again in a while and see how things are coming along. |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
I've been playing with the AX100 over the weekend. 4k is brilliantly sharp, as expected. 1080p is woefully soft. *scratches head* It doesn't make any sense to me why it's so soft straight out of the camera. Fortunately, a drop of "Sharpen" in Premiere and the 1080p snaps to life, looking about as good on my 1080p monitor as the downscaled 4k -- a relief, because as much as I wanted to fiddle with 4k, I had hoped to do a fair bit of 1080p shooting also!
Unfortunately, at least as far as I can tell, there is no in-camera sharpening like there seems to be in the RX10. Pity. Why?! (Pleeeaasssee?!) The conspiracy theorist in me is imagining Sony engineers being told to soften the 1080p image so that the 4k looks better. But no, they'd never stoop to something like that... |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
What mode do you have the camera in for 1080? I haven't shot RX10/AX100 side by side, but the XAVC S 1080/60p looked fairly good. Obviously not as sharp as the 4K, but not really "woefully soft", I think the 4K resets out expectations... the RX10 still looks great to me, but I do see it's a "little" soft, until you really get in close, and realize... yes, it's not as sharp as the 4K out of the same sensor/processor combo...
It's not a conspiracy, IMO it's two separate "development teams" that would benefit from some "cross-pollination" of ideas (like how about the VF switching the LCD off with the eye sensor like any EVF still camera?). The DNA of the AX100 is clearly "Handycam" in ancestry, while the RX10 has Alpha/Cybershot bloodlines. The result is some real serious head scratchers like a "MULTI" jack that operates differently between the two cams, the lack of XAVC S and 4K in the RX10, when clearly it COULD have it, and probably a few other "quirks". IMO a bit of "unification" as to controls/features would actually be beneficial, as the AX100/RX10/RX100 create a powerful "team" for image capture, even with the annoying differences! |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
are you using the MIS-SHOE without problems? I cannot use any heavy accessory on MIS-SHOE: there is the risk it could fall to the ground. I have already broken a lamp. The MIS-SHOE doesn't settle strongly on AX100 shoe. In fact after installing it on the shoe, if I shake the MIS-SHOE, it comes off. Thanks for your suggestions. |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
Last cam I bought was a PAL version from B&H, even with customs and shipping it was still cheaper than anything I could source in the EU. Of course theres always a risk purchasing outside your own country if you have to return a defective product. Anyway not buying anything at present, but will see how the 4K market develops. |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
I really can see little advantage for shooting in HD with the AX100. |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
Perhaps you have a defective one, or one that is not securely mounted or fastened. How "heavy" an accessory are you mounting? |
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
|
Re: Sony FDR-AX100
Quote:
I'm sure the "worst" HD from the AX100 will be far superior to the old CX12... just p vs. i will make a big difference! Make sure you're using the XAVCS 50Mbps 60p, it looks to me like it improves over the 28Mbps AVCHD. I'll have to do some tests against the RX10, but I think they'll match up OK. I'm also in the "not a fan of 30p aesthetic" club, but I'm trying to experiment with shutter speeds (manual control rather than letting the cam run auto) to see if some of that can be tamed, I think it is a critical part of the equation, based on a bit of playing with the 30p mode. I'd really rather shoot in 4K whenever possible, but I'm still "experimenting" and learning... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network