|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 28th, 2006, 05:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 221
|
Difference in image quality between 330 and 350?
What is the difference in image quality between 330 and 350?
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 08:18 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks California
Posts: 31
|
Image Quality is the same.
You can log into sony.com/xdcamhd and read up on the differences regarding functions |
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 09:56 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 173
|
There is no difference in image quality for shooting.
All the same. Only related to your question when viewing footage: The 350L has HD SDI out The 330L has HD analogue component HD out. Firewire into the computer is the same for both the 350 & 330. The 350L can "OverCrank" & "Undercrank" record. But they both produce the same image quality. Same. |
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 09:57 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 221
|
I am currently debating as too whether to go a PDW-330 with an average/stock lens - or the JVC HD200 with a good 5-7k lens -
What do you guys think would be a better option? |
|
|
|
|
December 3rd, 2006, 02:10 AM
|
#5 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
330 all the way without a doubt. Just buy an SD 1/2 Canon lens, the quality with them is hardly noticeable to the HD lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
