|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 1st, 2005, 03:24 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 320
|
Hi Tom, yes you're right there. For some reason I always thought the XM2 was around 600mm. And 480mm for the HC1 at 16:9, or 580mm at 4:3. Well, so it says in the manual.
Anyway, it's still a good range and even more so with the additional resolution. Glenn |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2005, 08:15 AM
|
#17 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 188
|
Hi Gerald, Is there any chance you can post some frames? Lets say some of wich you consider the best, and others under the worst (low light) conditions.
At a recent Local Sony demonstration they had one but it was "chained" so nobody could grab it, and it was conected to a very low quality computer monitor, so I was kind'a dissapointed with what I saw there. Thanks an congrats on your new cam, Alexis |
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2006, 07:00 PM
|
#18 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 10
|
HI,
I'm a bit late i know, but I saw your footage just today... I work as videomaker and often I have to shot just in the conditions depicted by you in S.Petersburg. Could you please post some footage or frames? thanks |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
