|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 10th, 2010, 01:52 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 14
|
Z1's future value
I have been having the Z1 for a while now and love it and probably would be happy with it for many more years.
However if I look around then I see all these new formats with progressive being a standard default option / with different frame rates. Z1 is not a cheap camera and as such should be treated as an investment. If I try to sell it now then I should be getting some good return on it vs. waiting for a few years and get close to nothing(?). At the same time I do not feel like spending big bucks on a newer camera but I guess it is still the better option. What do you guys think about this topic? Am I too "financial" in this matter and Z1 will be sought after for years to come? Best |
February 10th, 2010, 01:59 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
If the most important factor is the cam's resale value, sell it now. With each passing day the technology gets more outdated.
But if it's serving you well, hold onto it until it dies. There's nothing crucial about having the latest technology. The Z1 is a workhorse and will produce great pictures for many years to come.
__________________
"It can only be attributable to human error... This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error." |
February 23rd, 2010, 01:31 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 277
|
Well, one thing i'm keeping in mind is the Z1 is a 3 CCD camera, and at this point all of Sony's production prosumer & professional cams are CMOS cams...
So there's that. |
February 23rd, 2010, 02:05 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Bryan's right, and it's that one fact alone that stopped me in my tracks when I went to swap my Z1 out for a Z5. The rolling shutter effects inflict actual damage on the type of footage I shoot (I know, I've done two weddings on an EX1), so I decided to hang onto the CCD Z1 for a while longer.
CMOS chips certainly have their advantages but it's worth remembering that CMOS sensors don't have to have rolling shutters, but it makes the processing much easier if they do, and that means cheaper. It's perfectly possible to make a CMOS camera with a global shutter, and I suspect Sony are aiming at that eventually. I'll wait. And in waiting it's made me re-evaluate my market, clients and prices. However nice it would be for me to buy the latest kit, is my market base paying for these constant upgrades? Is the Z1 not performing to expectations? Is the final DVD quality not to my / their liking? While the Z1 continues to reliably deliver the goods, I'll stick with it. tom. |
February 23rd, 2010, 02:26 AM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
What gives you the idea that all of Sony's pro cameras are CMOS? Nothing could be further from the truth.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
February 23rd, 2010, 11:55 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
I was under the impression that the new camera trend was all CMOS as well. Seems like every new camera I know about are CMOS.
I have the FX1 which was half the price as the Z1U, which I seems a little overpriced considering how similar they are. I'm planning on buying the fixed lens Scarlet camera from RED when it is released, which should be a major upgrade with a really low price tag. I considered selling my FX1, but I don't think it's worth it. I decided to just hang on to it as a back up camera. |
February 23rd, 2010, 02:45 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 277
|
It was late, and I should definitely have qualified that statement!!! What I meant, specifically, was the Sony cameras within the price range of the Z1... :)
|
February 23rd, 2010, 03:15 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I figured as much, but didn't just want to leave that dangling out there. Most of Sonys Pro line is CCD, and the shift to CMOS is really in the prosumer and consumer space.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
February 24th, 2010, 01:56 AM | #9 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Quote:
tom. |
|
February 24th, 2010, 07:30 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 444
|
This will seem ignorant but what is rolling shutter,i have had 4 hd cams[3 hdv]with cmos chips since 2005 and i cant honestly say i have seen it or dont know if its there,i previously owned a 2100 with ccds.From what i have read rolling shutter will show on fast moving filming where the cam is moving quickly certainly if a cam is strapped to skateboards etc,i certaily have not tried that but did film round a car racing track as passenger with my canon hv and that looked fine.
Of note i was lucky to be be able to use a FX1000 and FX1 on a recent group shoot and for me the FX1000S footage is a class above the FX1 in fact i prefer my canons. http://www.dvxuser.com/jason/CMOS-CCD/ i cant remember having some of the problems shown here am i just lucky or blind, everyones saying blind. Last edited by Martyn Hull; February 24th, 2010 at 08:06 AM. |
March 5th, 2010, 10:54 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
Martyn, that article is quite disturbing since I shoot fast action and stabilize footage for effects work. I will have to research CMOS more, since CCD has been hard enough on my footage... |
|
March 20th, 2010, 09:29 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,212
|
I would personally endorse what Tom has written with the rider that it's worth remembering that the manufacturers only stay in business by selling stuff. Built-in obsolescence (or perceived obsolescence) is their game.
As long as our Z1s (we work with three) continue to operate correctly (and by recently adding MRC1Ks to each we've few moving parts to worry about) and our clients buy our work, we shall ignore the blandishments of camera manufacturers. I have a photographer pal who always has the newest Nikon and is always broke. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|