|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 21st, 2005, 03:08 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 74
|
FX1 dropouts
Got hit by my first FX1 dropout, a half second of video just shows as black on the Vegas timeline. Ouch. I'm using Pana AY-DVM63MQ ("master quality") tapes which are supposedly very good for preventing dropouts. Fortunately it was a two-camera shoot and the second camera shot was usable. What is your experience with dropouts? There are no retakes in weddings- does this mean I can only do 2-camera shoots if I use HDV? Is there any affordable HDV-compatable HDD recorder yet?
|
October 21st, 2005, 03:43 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
Ive had 7 DO's in about 120 hours recording and they were mainly in the early usage while the heads were bedding in, I cant remember the last drop out but I've developed a strategy to handle this
1 use a laptop if possible 2 use two cam shoot 3 for mission critical stuff where the above is not practical use a prerecorded tape that is known to be DO free. (label them DOFREE and store them for later use). As the DO is a tape quality issue a second use is likely to be statistically safer than an unknown fresh tape -similiar to the old days of blacking for timecode where the tape is used twice. 4 simultaneously record FX1 S-video into a cheap pocket sized palm cam - ok its SD but at least you get a picture and sound which is better than black
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
October 21st, 2005, 04:09 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 74
|
laptops for HDV recording
Thanks for the very useful info! I have a Dell Inspiron 9300 that I have used for HDV recording, but with the 17" screen it is bigger than I want for location work. Any suggestions for the smallest laptop that is usable for reliable HDV recording? I guess that implies running either Vegas 6 or DVRack with HDV pack
|
October 21st, 2005, 04:30 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
nice to give you back some info John after all I've got from visiting your site over the years
I dont use DVRack because it needs a laptop of a much higher spec than I own, however if you get CAPDVHS (free over the web - google!) an old P3 600 should suffice - make sure you run it at 800x600 so the interface looks as big as possible from a distance - 100Gb Hard Drives are as cheap as chips these days - and as long as you see the capture time increasing you know you are safe. also if you still have that little Sony DV deck you could probably do 4) above and make it look like a focus adjust at no extra cost - just a thought
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
October 21st, 2005, 04:43 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 74
|
CapDVHS works (on one of my WinXP boxes anyway)
Thanks for that tip, never heard of CapDVHS before but it looks like just what I want. So far I haven't got it to work with my FX1 camera though, any ideas? I'm using this on my WinXP desktop system for now. The FX1 is properly detected as Capture Device: Microsoft DV Camera and VCR (Unknown Video #1)
but when I press the "Rec." button I just get Error 80040217: Cannot connect SampleGrabber Edit: oops, never mind. CAPDVHS does work OK on my laptop. It sees "Capture Device: Microsoft DV Camera and VCR (Sony HDR-FX1 #1)" and the record to disk function works just fine. This is odd since both laptop and desktop are running Windows XP with all the latest patches, and Vegas 6 can capture HDV ok on my desktop. Oh well! |
October 21st, 2005, 05:09 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
mine reads
Microsoft AV/C Tape Subunit Device (Sony HDR-FX1 #1) check you have HDV forced playback (rather than auto) in the VCR format menu PS when running; for added security remove all non essential programs from memory including start up items good luck
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
October 21st, 2005, 05:33 PM | #7 | ||
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
http://www.css.ap.sony.com/consumer/....aspx?Id=44872 Quote:
http://www.focusinfo.com/sales/promotions/HDUpgrade.pdf |
||
October 22nd, 2005, 04:42 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 690
|
I use the Sony DVM63HD tapes. Pricey at $13 a piece, but I've shot almost ten hours and have yet to experience a single dropout.
|
October 22nd, 2005, 07:34 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Ditto what Dick says.
I have never seen a dropout using the Sony HDV tapes. I think that the drop out issue is a massive beatup - you are far more likely to have other things wreck your footage than the chance of a dropout.
__________________
Graeme |
October 22nd, 2005, 11:01 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 35
|
sony digital master
40 hours w. sony recommended digital master. So far not a dropout.
Muprhy's Law is certainly in effect and heading for me. lewis
__________________
Roll Video Inc. Z1 G5 Fear is faith it won't work out |
October 23rd, 2005, 01:45 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bevery Hills, CA
Posts: 48
|
No drops (knock on wood!)
Some 40-50 hours shot + some extra 10 hours of "tests/domestic" footage, all shot on Sony DVC Execellnce DV tapes. Not a single drop.
|
October 23rd, 2005, 11:21 AM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Muskegon, MI
Posts: 213
|
DV vs HDV tapes
Quote:
So should I stick with these guys or pay more for the HDV tapes? I read sony's statement (thanks for that post). I don't understand why this format woudl need a different kind of tape. The data rate is similar (I think?) and I know the tapes moving at the same speed over the heads (I think?). Am I understanding this correctly? Daniel
__________________
Daniel Rudd Digital Storyteller (Sony HDV, Aspect HD) Soundtrack Creation & Royalty Free Music Production www.stock20.com |
|
October 23rd, 2005, 01:35 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Daniel,
You don't need the HDV tapes - DV excellence also work very well - they are supposedly just more resistant to tape drop outs. As I and others have said - they are very rare - unless you use cheap tapes.
__________________
Graeme |
November 1st, 2005, 01:02 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 93
|
I've shot about 20 hours on Sony Premium DV tapes (DVM60PR3). Cheap tapes and so far no dropouts. For weddings I'd agree that the S-Video out to a second SD backup cam is a great idea.
Better yet, put that cheap palm cam on a tripod at an extreme closeup (holding hands, minister's face). That way you can dissolve to it if need be and it will look like you just took an extreme closeup from the HD fotage for dramatic effect. With the S-Video idea dropout coverage would look like this: HDV -> DV -> HDV But it would all be the same shot, so the resolution would momentarily drop then come back up again. Shooting from a different angle or focal length would give you a reason to cut to that shot. So yes, if I were shooting a wedding I'd have a backup cam just in case. |
November 2nd, 2005, 05:18 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Saskatoon, Canada (was London, UK)
Posts: 138
|
About twenty hours on everything from Sony HDV tapes down to $2 TDK DV tapes, and no dropouts so far.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|