![]() |
Sample Videos on Vimeo
|
A friend of mine got an FX1000 last weekend and his initial impressions are that the images look awesome but he does not think they are quite as sharp as the EX1 he has been renting. He thought the low light performance was similar to his PD170 and FX2100 but he really preferred the image from the FX1000 to the PD170 under low light shooting conditions. He was amazed at the lens on the wide angle end and was really excited about that aspect. He thought the controls were much better than the VX2100/PD170/V1U/EX1. He felt it was much easier to use with full manual operation than any of the others. He was a little disappointed that the LCD was smaller than the EX1 he has been using. But he didn't realize that the EVF was actually higher resolution than the EX1. He usually doesn't use the EVF so that wasn't an important feature to him. Overall, he is extremely happy with his new toy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The EX1 is a great camera but may not be the best for me. For example I was at 2 weddings this weekend, I tried to pay attention every time I went past 12-14 times zoom. It was often! I was surprised how much I rely on the 20x zoom on my A1. So the Z5 has some great features. better low light then the A1, better LCD to focus with, hybrid recording with the flash recorder, it now has the iris on the lens like the A1, and it has even a wider lens that comes in very handy at weddings. It's not so cut and dry, plus the Z5 is a lot cheaper to get into. I have varizoom controllers that will work on the Z5 but not EX. On the other hand, if the picture really was overly soft and it could not be fixed then I would have to lean toward the EX. I for one believe HD should look like HD. The Z5 fits me better as an overall cam, the EX satisfies my quality wants. So I am digging for info through Jeff to see example of the image it can create. I think the Z5 is a bit more flexible so it may be better for me. I do a lot of manual tweaking. I have a few weeks before the Z comes out. Thanks again to Jeff for keeping the info coming! Paul |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He was using a light most all of the time, clearly, but still, the colors are excellent and the contrast was very good. It can be picked apart, etc., but all in all that is close to stunning footage. |
Quote:
That said it looks as of Sony has added a lot of picture profile features in the FX1000, that they would have normally reserved for their broadcast cameras. Nice to see. Jeff, BTW one question... Can you nor use the "Focus Assist" feature while the camera is running, or do you have to be in stand by, like you had to be on the FX1/Z1? |
Quote:
It's not that bad, but definitely still present. Guess we have to accept this as the norm for a while when using CMOS sensors. |
Quote:
|
Michael, haven't used it. But it has an on/off setting in the menu, and there is no indication in the manual that you must be in standby. I will turn it on when I next get the cam out and play with it, but I feel certain the answer is no.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
On my monitor many of the shots look overblown, but if anything that tells me the cams light sensitivity is high and he just has to learn it. I'm glad to see footage starting to hit the streets though. |
Quote:
This is the manual for the FX1000 and clearly states it has Black stretch etc. As I said it looks like it has most of what was only available in the Z series. There may be other controls that are missing but it has most of what I want. Shockless gain would be nice shockless WB is of no interest to me as most of what I do is in a theatre environment fixed. Maybe it is these things that are the difference this time to the Z series. Maybe Jeff can confirm it has Black stretch etc. Ron Evans |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network