|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 21st, 2012, 08:50 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 37
|
Transcoding to prores to solve highlight clipping?
I read that while editing FS100 footage on a mac, it is better to transcode the footage to pro res to save the highlights from clipping.
I know some people are editing the mts files natively. What is everyone else doing? |
July 21st, 2012, 03:46 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
|
Re: Transcoding to prores to solve highlight clipping?
Tough I'm not on Mac anymore, interesting read.
|
July 22nd, 2012, 07:02 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Posts: 294
|
Re: Transcoding to prores to solve highlight clipping?
"It's darker than my LCD screen": LCD screens tend to be very bright and unreliable to check brightness.
That's why zebras and waveforms exist. My questions: are there any superwhites in the original footage that's being pulled down by the transcoded to ProRes? In other words: does the transcoder remap the luminance to 0-100IRE?
__________________
Brainstormnavigator searching for the hole in the sky..... Audiovisual Designer (NL) - http://www.brokxmedia.nl |
July 22nd, 2012, 09:21 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Re: Transcoding to prores to solve highlight clipping?
Ho ho! We've been discussing this in the FS100 room of the 'green forum' - seems to be the meme of the month.
I ran into this a few weeks ago, running an FS700 workshop - didn't know it was considered an issue. So much so, I wrote this blog about it. Dealing with 109% whites – the footage that goes to 11 Travelling Matt I didn't cover Avid et al as I have no experience with other packages, but am assured that they are all pretty much the same. Only joker in the pack was FCP7. So, check your waveform monitor, adjust your footage accordingly, and if you don't like that responsibility, shoot to a 100% safe profile. Simples! (squeak)
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
July 24th, 2012, 12:51 AM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Re: Transcoding to prores to solve highlight clipping?
Just be aware that cinegamma 1 and cinegamma 2 have exactly the same latitude. Even though the recording levels are different, the latitude is the same, so almost nothing is lost by using broadcast safe cinegamma 2.
The only difference that recording up to 109% brings is a few extra bits of data per stop that may help reduce banding if you do a lot of heavy post work, but the difference is extremely small. Plus of course the image looks a little darker due to the lower recording level.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|