|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 31st, 2004, 06:57 AM | #16 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Welcome Tatjana!
The VX2100 is an amazing cam for the price and for a little more you can get the PD170 with built-in XLRs. Either of these cams will give you a great picture and I would only consider the XL2 if you require widescreen and 24p/30p. |
August 31st, 2004, 02:10 PM | #17 |
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
Keep in mind the XL2 only uses the the full 1/3 inch chips in the 16:9 mode.......4:3 is the same as 1/4 inch chips.
<<<-- Originally posted by Tatjana Knapp : I'm one step away from purchasing vx2100, but I cannot help wondering.... Should I wait for canon xl2, in which I ''fell in love'' right after it was announced to come out (little short on cash to get it just now)? In any case I'd use it for short videos and some documentary work. Decisions... Right now I'm (un)happy with my little sony dcr-trv60E (very cute for home use, but of course no more than that). -->>>
__________________
Lou Bruno |
August 31st, 2004, 02:13 PM | #18 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
|
|
September 6th, 2004, 12:04 AM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
The reason a lot of us passed on the XL1 or 2 is tha lack of a decent side screen. In my view, and for my type of shooting, this is a very serious omission.
tom. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|