DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/)
-   -   Dissatisfied with Sony Prime Support (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/118203-dissatisfied-sony-prime-support.html)

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 08:46 AM

Michael,
FW 1.05 is the newest version of the firmware. Prime Support updated it at their last repair attempt, but it did not fix the camera then. (It had FW1.03 when I bought it.)
I bought my camera 2 months ago - serial#401780
I guess their problem at the repair attempts is a not ideal setup for the FB adjustment, or maybe they did it for one ND setting only.
But thats just speculation... I´m still hearing from other EX1 owners that they got their cameras back without successful repairs as well, although their FW was also updated.

cu,
Gerald
(finally a happy EX-1 owner)

Steven Thomas March 28th, 2008 08:57 AM

This is really good news!

You would think that the repair center would have the correct procedure.

I'm wondering if version 1.03 would of worked if you had tried?

Which brings up the question, what does v1.05 offer?

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 09:04 AM

As the loaner camera with FW1.03 was not picked up yet - I will unbox it again and try the same setup - will let you know in about an hour.

Steven Thomas March 28th, 2008 09:13 AM

Thank you.
I have not looked, but I'm betting that's my version.

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 09:42 AM

That was an easy test and it went pretty quickly.
Same setup and procedure, but this time with the loaner camera and FW1.03.
Fixed! Works with all ND settings. So I do not know what they changed for FW1.05.
I guess Prime Support will now wonder that I send back a fully working loaner camera, because I always complained about it and wanted another one...

So I guess the new FW 1.05 is not necessary to fix the backfocus issue - but it might have worked for this camera only...

If I´ve came up with this solution earlier I could have saved me a lot of trouble and grief...

cu,
Gerald

Piotr Wozniacki March 28th, 2008 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerald Loidl (Post 849934)
Today I fixed the backfocus problem for myself, just before I wanted to return my EX1 for another exchange.
I did the FB-adjustment procedure once again - but this time I used 12 backfocus charts side by side (actually 4 columns and 3 rows), which I attached to a white wall of my house.

Congrats, Gerald - very encouraging news indeed!

May I know how big the charts you've used are? A4?

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 09:57 AM

Piotr,
yes A4 - if you have a larger printer it would not hurt too.
I´m sure it will work with less than 12 charts as well, but 1 just is not enough.

regards,
Gerald

Michael Mann March 28th, 2008 10:05 AM

Gerald, are you sure that backfocus stays fixed after changing ND-filter setting? Wasn't there a user who said this could cause the backfocus to shift again?

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 10:21 AM

Michael,
so far it works - I switched between the settings multiple times.
I cant guarantee it will work forever - maybe tomorrow it will be another story again...
But during my test today I did a lot of switching between the filter settings and it did not change anything.
I hope it will stay like this.

regards,
Gerald

Michael Mann March 28th, 2008 10:26 AM

Thanks Gerald, good to hear that.

Steven Thomas March 28th, 2008 11:07 AM

Gerald, this is GREAT NEWS, but at the same time puzzling.

Why does Adam Wilts' EX1 camera only allow correct back focus on only one ND setting at a given time, not on each?

http://provideocoalition.com/index.p..._explained/P0/

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Thomas (Post 850089)
Gerald, this is GREAT NEWS, but at the same time puzzling.

Why does Adam Wilts' EX1 camera only allow correct back focus on only one ND setting at a given time, not on each?

http://provideocoalition.com/index.p..._explained/P0/

yeah I read this article a couple of days ago - and I do not have an answer for this...

Steven Thomas March 28th, 2008 11:24 AM

Maybe something is unique about Adams's camera.

I HIGHLY respect Adam. He's ideas and input has been very valuable for myself and many others!

Gerald Loidl March 28th, 2008 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Thomas (Post 850100)
Maybe something is unique about Adams's camera.

I HIGHLY respect Adam. He's ideas and input has been very valuable for myself and many others!

I think we all respect Adam very much! His articles always offer an enormous source of information. Maybe his camera really is different. They seem to have their own will ;-)

Leonard Levy March 28th, 2008 09:51 PM

I turned Adam on to the problem actually but I've never tried Gerald's inventive solution.
Gerald are you looking at the picks on a large monitor to be sure its absolutely fixed? I find its easy to miss and the clincher is usually to engage the ND, look at distant objects ( trees are good) with wide open fstop and then turn the focus ring from infinity down to 3'. If it gets sharper toward 3' you are still screwed.

Were the 12 focus charts just ordinary starburst charts the size of letter paper? If this works you should get a MacArthur award!

My buddy has one that's out , so I will email him this. I hope it works.

BTW the guys at Sony in San jose were incredibly nice to deal with.

Lenny Levy


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network