DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/)
-   -   First XDCAM EX3 Review (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/119205-first-xdcam-ex3-review.html)

Phil Bloom April 12th, 2008 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark David Williams (Post 859025)
Light hits the lens from all sides which is focused to hit the flame plane. The bigger the film plane then less dof will result. However by opening closing the iris you can concentrate the light into a smaller area which will then need less focusing..

The smaller the film plane the more dof you will get. There is no way around this. Video cameras usually have small film planes or sensors.

The adapters use a larger film plane and the camera lens then films whats on that.

well put!!!

Nate Weaver April 12th, 2008 04:22 PM

The Circle of Confusion on this thread is about .00000001!

Phil Bloom April 12th, 2008 04:25 PM

am confused!!!!!!!

Nate, why you selling your F350?

Filip Kovcin April 12th, 2008 05:11 PM

to phil bloom
 
hi,

can you explain us - if you know of course - something about that new letus if used with ex3 camera.

- is this adapter build WITH special (compesating) lens included ?
in another words - is this more or less typical letus but with additional lens on the back/video camera side which makes possible using camera without it's own lens on the camera body?

thanks,

filip kovcin

Ian Smith April 12th, 2008 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Bloom (Post 858798)
Will be online on my site Sunday afternoon after the official launch. It was supposed to be secret but the cat is out of the bag. I wish I could share it with you now but I have agreed to hold it until the press conference in Vegas on Sunday afternoon.

It's an in depth Video Review, a written one and a short shot with it.

Looking forward to reading your review, and hoping that while at NAB you also get a chance to look at the rumoured RED 'Scarlet' hand-held camera - seems to be a LOT of excitement amongst friends in the industry over this (although one suspects it's some time away from being delivered) vs not a lot over the Sony.

Mike Thomann April 12th, 2008 06:14 PM

hmm, that car was in the water like all day! aren't there any tow cables?

Charles Young April 12th, 2008 09:12 PM

Depth of field explained

The above is only the tip of the iceburg.

here is my drop of water:

DOF is a function of sensor size and f setting. The greater the sensor size the greater the FOV. The smaller the f setting (larger aperture) the less the depth of field (and more expensive the lens).

Eric Pascarelli April 12th, 2008 09:49 PM

Charles,

"Depth of field" actually refers to the depth in a scene in which objects appear in focus. More depth = more of the scene in focus.

Because we use expensive accessories on video cameras to simulate the properties of a 35mm film camera, many seem to think that by adding these accessories we are getting "greater depth of field."

In fact, using standard photographic terminology, a 35mm adapter gives LESS depth of field. Wider apertures also give less depth of field. Larger formats (film and chip size) give less depth of field at a given FOV and aperture.

I think that a misunderstanding of the terminology is what causes so much confusion on this topic.

Dave Morrison April 12th, 2008 09:54 PM

Thanks Eric. I was about to take my own life. Good explanation.

Charles Young April 12th, 2008 10:01 PM

FOV??? did I write that, Oops, way too long of a day...

Larger or more DOF with A SMALLER aperature, hince a pin hole camera needs no focusing and has an infinite DOF.

Larger aperature gives less DOF and an infinitly expensive lens gives a... I don't know what you call an infinitly small DOF, hmm

I will sleep on it...

Thanks Eric

Phil Bloom April 12th, 2008 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Thomann (Post 859069)
hmm, that car was in the water like all day! aren't there any tow cables?

it was parked on the boat ramp, the tide came up. swept it away, then the tide went down and it was towed out. The tide comes up very high in that part of the Thames and often floods around there. Locals know never to park your car even in some of the parking spaces!

Brian Cassar April 12th, 2008 10:36 PM

Phil, at what time today do you think you'll post up the review on the EX3?

Phil Bloom April 12th, 2008 10:45 PM

I would say midnight tomorrow night GMT

It's all ready...just need to click that publish button!!

Robb Cox April 12th, 2008 11:40 PM

Awesome Phil, cant wait to read about it... Im sure its a fantastic camera, but from the look of the pics of the EX3, its taken a heavy dose of ugly pills... IMO...

:) Cheers

Leonard Levy April 13th, 2008 02:33 AM

Could somebody ( other than Philip who's sworn to secrecy) who saw the accidental sneak preview description of the EX-3 tell us what was in it. The article is gone for now.

Brian Cassar April 13th, 2008 02:48 AM

I second Leonard! Whoever have read the article, is there anything way out different from the EX1? From the photos all I can see are the following changes: interchangeable lens / a monitor evf combination with an interesting mechanism / a revamped body with better placed buttons / some additional inputs and outputs / a very useful second accessory shoe placed in an interesting place.

I'm eager to know whether there is the facility to record SD like the 335 and 355's!

Mike Thomann April 13th, 2008 02:49 AM

yes, the big secret is that it's the new lens-less organic sensor technology. interesting stuff. could there ever have been a more anticipated moment on here than midnight tomorrow?

Ivan Snoeckx April 13th, 2008 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alister Chapman (Post 858972)
I think the number 2 is unlucky in Japan.

Nope! It is 4.

You have D1, D2, D3 1/2" Digital, D5 1/2" Component, D6 and so on, but no D4.

Raymond Schlogel April 13th, 2008 03:28 AM

From the little I've managed to dig up I'm guessing the secondary shoe is for a new 60 gig hard drive, redundancy or dumping? Both? Dunno.

- Ray

Alexander Kubalsky April 13th, 2008 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leonard Levy (Post 859191)
Could somebody ( other than Philip who's sworn to secrecy) who saw the accidental sneak preview description of the EX-3 tell us what was in it. The article is gone for now.

I read the article. Thought I was dreaming. Out of respect for Phil though I'll wait till he breaks the news. Nigels article was not an actual hands on review. Just a copy and paste of the facts which will be made public in hours anyway.

Phil should have an actual hands on review up tonight....which will be Monday afternoon my (Tokyo) time. Damn, why ain't the world flat.

Alexander Kubalsky April 13th, 2008 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leonard Levy (Post 859191)
Could somebody ( other than Philip who's sworn to secrecy) who saw the accidental sneak preview description of the EX-3 tell us what was in it. The article is gone for now.

I read the article. Thought I was dreaming. Out of respect for Phil though I'll wait till he breaks the news. I suck at Nigels article was not an actual hands on review. Just a copy and paste of the facts that will be made public in hours anyway.

Phil should have an actual hands on review up Sunday Night....which will be Monday afternoon my (Tokyo) time. Damn, why ain't the world flat.

Ivan Snoeckx April 13th, 2008 04:09 AM

I have the whole article including all the pictures, but am not going to post it because I do not want any trouble with Sony.

But this is what I still can find on another website.

The PHU-60K is an SxS Professional 60GB HardDisc Recorder.

It can be used either by recording directly from an SxS lead to the card slot or transfer from an SxS card when inserted in the other card slot.

Announcement of 32 GB SxS cards (2 hours @35Mb/s). Available in september.

For the rest you'll have to wait.

Gerald Loidl April 13th, 2008 04:32 AM

Excellent review Philip! I love your demonstration video where you are showing all the new features. (I was amazed that it is already online - I hope thats not by accident...)
I should have returned my EX1 when I still had the chance to do so, with all the backfocus issues. Sony will have lots of unhappy EX1 owners now...
The new EX3 looks like a killer camera! It has everything I miss on the EX1.

Thanks Philip for sharing this review.

regards,
Gerald

John Hewat April 13th, 2008 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerald Loidl (Post 859213)
I should have returned my EX1 when I still had the chance to do it with all the backfocus issues. Sony will have lots of unhappy EX1 owners now...
The new EX3 looks like a killer camera! It has everything I miss on the EX1.

Lots of people are saying that but is it likely to be a replacement or a higher-end model? I know for me, the EX1 was as much as I could afford (and then some) so if the EX3 is going to cost much more than the EX1 it would probably have been out of my league anyway. I know the EX1 has had some manufacturing troubles, but the footage is incredible - I for one have no disappointment with it.

If it turns out the EX3 is better and only $500 more expensive then I'll be a bit frustrated though!

Alexander Kubalsky April 13th, 2008 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Hewat (Post 859214)
Lots of people are saying that but is it likely to be a replacement or a higher-end model? I know for me, the EX1 was as much as I could afford (and then some) so if the EX3 is going to cost much more than the EX1 it would probably have been out of my league anyway. I know the EX1 has had some manufacturing troubles, but the footage is incredible - I for one have no disappointment with it.

If it turns out the EX3 is better and only $500 more expensive then I'll be a bit frustrated though!

The EX3 will be something like $11,500, so yeah, It would have been out of my league too.
I have no regrets on buying the EX1 either. The EX3 looks like something to graduate into later on.

John Hewat April 13th, 2008 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexander Kubalsky (Post 859215)
The EX3 will be $11,500, so yeah, It would have been out of my league too.

Which would be about $12,500 - $13,000 in Australia. Waaaay to much for me!

Ivan Snoeckx April 13th, 2008 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Hewat (Post 859214)
If it turns out the EX3 is better and only $500 more expensive then I'll be a bit frustrated though!

Only $500 more expensiver? Trust me, it will be more then that.

Phil Bloom April 13th, 2008 05:18 AM

it will be more than that

Mark David Williams April 13th, 2008 05:50 AM

The EX-1 was to my mind the first really viable pro camera within reach and was ready to take (for me anyway) A huge step and purchase a camera that cost almost the price of a small car. And through Phil Blooms posts discovered the amazing Letus adapter. Making it affordable now to create films. So borrowed over three years £7000

NOW. We have the EX-3 which is even more suited to this purpose than the EX-1. It should have been released the other way round giving people a choice. Many will now sell their EX-1s and buy the EX-3. Very good marketing for Sony whether accidental or not.

I think it would be really nice if Sony was to give some kind of trade in deal perhaps on a time limit for those who bought the EX-1 but would rather have purchased the EX-3. It wouldnt be many and would do wonders for customer relations in my opinion.

John Hewat April 13th, 2008 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark David Williams (Post 859224)
I think it would be really nice if Sony was to give some kind of trade in deal perhaps on a time limit for those who bought the EX-1 but would rather have purchased the EX-3. It wouldnt be many and would do wonders for customer relations in my opinion.

I suppose. I keep thinking to myself "What more could you want from a camera?" and Phil's site is perhaps the best evidence of that - his footage amazes me every time. But I guess I can see that many customers would wish they had the choice...

George Kroonder April 13th, 2008 06:44 AM

Nigels article online again
 
For those who missed it the first time around: New Sony Solid-State HD Products at NAB 2008 @ dvuser.co.uk.

I suppose the Sony embargo has been lifted ;)

So what I like about it so far (and not having seen/handled the real thing) in order of my preference:
- Done away with the viewfinder
- Better ergonomics (most controls on the left)
- Interchangable lens
- Frame rate control dial
- Flip switch on the LCD
- LCD controls are manual dials
- Timecode in/out
- All bnc's on the back, easy to manage
- Mic mount seems sturdier
- Cover over te audio levels

Also with what I presume to be the same sensor block and standard lens, it will be an exact match to the EX1. Just with some more options.

And how about that 2nd cold shoe at the back with the cable clasp on the handle that seems to be purpose build to take the PHU-60K SxS Professional 60GB HardDisc Recorder ;)

George/

P.S. Looking forward to Phil Blooms hands on review!

Paul Curtis April 13th, 2008 07:30 AM

Does the Letus Ultimate bypass the lens on the EX3 then? I would get interested in that setup if it was true.

Also putting some fast lenses on there would help DOF, the half inch sensor isn't *that* much smaller than a 2/3rds.

f1.2 or T1.3 lenses could make a practical visual difference (T1.4 on 2/3rds same as T1.2 on half)

Very interesting though...

cheers
paul

Sean Seah April 13th, 2008 07:31 AM

Phil's review is Great!

Ray Bell April 13th, 2008 07:44 AM

Can you point us to Phils review of the EX3?
or is it not up yet?

Ray Bell April 13th, 2008 07:47 AM

Phil Bloom,

Not sure how long you will be in Vegas, but it would be a shame if you can't take a day to check out the Grand Canyon while here.....

I promise you will thank yourself if you take one of the heliicoptor rides out
to the canyon... might not be cheap, but it will be a memory you will never
forget :-)

George Kroonder April 13th, 2008 07:54 AM

If Phil is still in Vegas it's still really early there now, so lets give him a break.
I'm sure getting the review up is his highest priority on Sunday morning!

George/

Magnus Eklof April 13th, 2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean Seah (Post 859257)
Phil's review is Great!

Where is it?? Can´t find it, please help, I´m jonesing badly for more info...
Magnus (having the shakes, gear-related)

Brendan Pyatt April 13th, 2008 08:36 AM

i am having a problem with the pictures in the review covering some of the text.

Windows XP and Internet Explorer 7.

Scott Karlins April 13th, 2008 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brendan Pyatt (Post 859284)
i am having a problem with the pictures in the review covering some of the text.

Windows XP and Internet Explorer 7.

Brendan,

Don't know what you are looking at, but Phil's review is not out yet... :)

Scott K.

Steven Thomas April 13th, 2008 09:17 AM

The EX3 will be almost twice the price of the EX1.
It's really at a different price point.

EX3 is an EX1 with detachable lens, so unless you plan on buying more lenses, this will also up the price.

I'm real interested in the SxS hard drive recorder, although I'm blown away Sony only offered it with 60GB.... What the... Hard drives are cheap!

PHU-60K SxS Professional 60GB HardDisc Recorder.

Also, what I really want is an EX1 that's not riddled with various issues. I'm not understanding why the EX1 has so many issues, it not like they has never made video cameras. Having said that, let's hope the near future software upgrade addresses these issues and adds enhancements.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network