DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/)
-   -   Ex1 or Ex3 purchase decision... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-xdcam-ex-pro-handhelds/122017-ex1-ex3-purchase-decision.html)

Eric Pascarelli May 21st, 2008 12:22 AM

I took the lens off of the EX3 at NAB (and then Sony Reps descended on me and took the camera away from me). I was hoping to find the secret of the EX1 backfocus problem by examining the internal ND filters of the EX3.

The mount is definitely all-metal, but felt more "die cast" or stamped than finely machined. It was definitely not as sturdy or precise as a PL or Panavision mount, but was stronger and nicer than, say, a Nikon mount. The design is quite unusual because of the mount's versatility - the flange depth is almost zero, allowing many optical options.

The pin for releasing the bayonet seemed rather crude (it was like a zoom lever) but then this was a pre-release camera. I am sure the final package will be quite a bit slicker.

Ray Bell May 21st, 2008 08:28 AM

Just to chime in...

The camera at two times the price of an EX1 is too expensive....

The price of this Cam needs to come down...

Phil Bloom May 30th, 2008 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Grant (Post 880665)
Given the ongoing back focus problems with the EX1 my feeling is that the interchangeable lens mount on the EX3 could be a negative feature. It doesn't look as solid as a PL or B4 mount, it appears to be only plastic.

unlike b4 mounts the ex3 lens has no mechanical adjustment to fiddle with so i can't see it making any difference to the ex1 backfocus.

The new firmware that Sony install when you send your camera back apparently fixed the back focus issue. The proper firmware update that will be done by users won't be out until early Autumn when the 32gb cards come out.

Steve Phillipps May 30th, 2008 04:04 AM

Hard to imagine how a firmware update can influence back focus, what am I missing here?
Steve

Buba Kastorski May 30th, 2008 06:27 AM

No way I'm paying double price for the same sensor size, I'll give up my EX1 only when/if half inch EX will be out;
:-)

George Kroonder May 30th, 2008 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Phillipps (Post 885594)
Hard to imagine how a firmware update can influence back focus, what am I missing here?
Steve

At least for the EX1 the camera talks to the lens to compensate for ND. For this it uses a single Look Up Table (LUT) with corrections for the ND positions.

In the EX1 with firmware prior to 1.05 this correction data is incorrect, resulting in BF problems at one or more ND settings. This aparently differs per camera.

A FB Adjustment function is present in the service menu to "rewrite" the LUT, which can be used (sparingly) as a workaround. With FW 1.05 the adjustment should result in correct backfocus at all ND positions.

I have no specific information about the EX3 mount and how you will be able to adjust BF. Hhowever I expect it to be similar to the Z7/Z270 which have a similar menu-driven auto adjustment feature in the user menu as found in the EX1 service menu but includes "manual" adjustment as well (it's actually more like semi-automatic).

George/

Paul Kellett May 30th, 2008 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Bloom (Post 885569)
The proper firmware update that will be done by users won't be out until early Autumn when the 32gb cards come out.

Phil.
Is this a definate ?
IE from a reliable source. I'm quite happy with my self fixed backfocus,although i wouldn't mind having the latest firmware, i've got V1.02.

Paul.

George Kroonder May 30th, 2008 08:41 AM

Philip is a reliable source ;)

But no release schedule is ever to be relied on.

Aparently a FW update is needed to support he new 32GB cards and harddisk unit, so Sony has to make it available around the release to be able to sell these things. That is always a good motivator for companies.

What other goodies will be in this release is unclear, but it's really unlikely to be a step back from 1.05.

George/

Paul Kellett May 30th, 2008 08:51 AM

Yeah i know Phil is a relialble source, i just meant was his source reliable.

Paul.

Piotr Wozniacki May 30th, 2008 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Kellett (Post 885675)
Yeah i know Phil is a relialble source, i just meant was his source reliable.

Paul.

Ditto, and Amen.

Let us all hope it was!

Ray Bell May 30th, 2008 06:10 PM

For the price that is being asked for the EX3, it should at the minimum
have, 2/3 sensors and 422 color, if not 444 color...

Alister Chapman May 31st, 2008 02:23 AM

Well there is an HD camera that is 4:2:2 with 2/3" CCDs for the price of an EX3. But you have to decide whether you want SD sensors or Full 1920x1080 HD sensors.

Phil Bloom May 31st, 2008 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Bell (Post 885971)
For the price that is being asked for the EX3, it should at the minimum
have, 2/3 sensors and 422 color, if not 444 color...

Ray...the price being asked (street price will be around 10k), is cheap. 2/3 sensors, 422 colour (444? really?) removable lens, full HD sensor? Then look at the PDW700 that is a hell of a lot more than 10k.

Also don't forget this is a small camera. Not a full size camera. Which is advantageous for so many reasons.

I have just placed my order for one. I can't wait!

Tim Polster May 31st, 2008 07:45 AM

What I don't understand is the lens offered with the EX-3 is the same as the EX-1.

IMHO, they should have offered a longer lens with the EX-3 to separate it from the EX-1.

That way you justify it as a compliment to the EX-1.

Right now it looks like a larger EX-1 that costs $4,000 more.

I realize that one could purchase a separate lens, but to be honest, that would take the camera out of its price class.

Phil Bloom May 31st, 2008 07:54 AM

i guess that would require getting fujinon to make another lens. Quite a cost which would have bumped up the price even more.

It is the same with a lot of cameras. The glass often costs more than the bodies. The cheaper the camera the more likely that will be. High quality 22 x 2/3" HD glass with extender costs 2 and a half times more than an HPX500.

To get the same lens for 1/2" that would fit the ex3 and my f350 i would need to spend about £10,000. I have a 20x Canon without extender for my F350 that will work my EX3 already so I am lucky but that in itself cost £5500 and it is far from best lens out there!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network