Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? at DVinfo.net

Ryan Koo · March 4th, 2011, 10:04 AM

Alright guys, help me with my math here... I'm not interested in starting a flame war with the RED folk, but because the pixel pitch of the two cameras is so drastically different, it's an issue worth exploring. I'm not an engineer and math isn't my strong suit -- so is this right, wrong, or somewhere in between?

Does the Sony F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC?

Peter Moretti · March 4th, 2011, 10:32 AM

"When it comes to pixel pitch, bigger is better. Think of the pixels as if they were buckets, and light as if it were rain. If you’ve got larger buckets (pixels), you’ll catch more rain (light)."

But if you have more buckets you catch more rain also. And the Red has a lot more buckets (pixels) than the Sony does. Put another way, if you had to catch rain, would you rather have 2 five gallon buckets or 17 one gallon buckets?

Because Sony makes great chips, I do expect them to have an advantage in this area, but not anywhere like you're suggesting/asking about.

Brian Drysdale · March 4th, 2011, 10:39 AM

The F3 has a similar ISO 800 rating to the RED MX sensor. Because it records 1920x1080p, doesn't mean that's the number of pixels on the sensor.

There has been some speculation on the number of pixels on the F3, but the numbers discussed are much larger than the 2 million mentioned. It would need to be to achieve a high resolution with a Bayer variation sensor. However, someone did get a horizontal pixel figure of "about 2500" from a Sony Guy.

Peter Moretti · March 4th, 2011, 10:43 AM

Right Brian, the Sony probably has more that 2MP, but it doesn't have 14MP. The number I've heard thrown around is 3.6MP. But who knows if that's right.

Aaron Newsome · March 4th, 2011, 10:45 AM

Sony published the sensor resolution of the F3 online. If I recall correctly, it was around 3.36 megapixels.

Nate Weaver · March 4th, 2011, 11:32 AM

The two are probably within a stop of each other.

The thing that comes to mind for me though, to get the best looking/lowest amount of noise when you're pushing the ISO on the Red, is that you have to spend the time to full resolution debayers. Half res debayers, which are acceptable for a lot of 1080p work, look worse when you boost the Red's ISO to numbers like 3200.

So in one sense, there's a time penalty (or money, to use a Red Rocket in real time) to get the best high ISO images out of a Red..where the F3 does it real time to cards.

March 4th, 2011, 10:04 AM	#1
Ryan Koo Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New York, NY Posts: 92	Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? Alright guys, help me with my math here... I'm not interested in starting a flame war with the RED folk, but because the pixel pitch of the two cameras is so drastically different, it's an issue worth exploring. I'm not an engineer and math isn't my strong suit -- so is this right, wrong, or somewhere in between? Does the Sony F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC?

March 4th, 2011, 10:32 AM	#2
Peter Moretti Trustee Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Sherman Oaks, CA Posts: 1,259	Re: Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? "When it comes to pixel pitch, bigger is better. Think of the pixels as if they were buckets, and light as if it were rain. If you’ve got larger buckets (pixels), you’ll catch more rain (light)." But if you have more buckets you catch more rain also. And the Red has a lot more buckets (pixels) than the Sony does. Put another way, if you had to catch rain, would you rather have 2 five gallon buckets or 17 one gallon buckets? Because Sony makes great chips, I do expect them to have an advantage in this area, but not anywhere like you're suggesting/asking about. __________________ Avid Media Composer 3.1.3. Boris Red and Continuum Complete. Vegas 8.0c. TMPGEnc Xpress Pro 4.0

March 4th, 2011, 10:39 AM	#3
Brian Drysdale Inner Circle Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Belfast, UK Posts: 6,143	Re: Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? The F3 has a similar ISO 800 rating to the RED MX sensor. Because it records 1920x1080p, doesn't mean that's the number of pixels on the sensor. There has been some speculation on the number of pixels on the F3, but the numbers discussed are much larger than the 2 million mentioned. It would need to be to achieve a high resolution with a Bayer variation sensor. However, someone did get a horizontal pixel figure of "about 2500" from a Sony Guy.

March 4th, 2011, 10:43 AM	#4
Peter Moretti Trustee Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Sherman Oaks, CA Posts: 1,259	Re: Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? Right Brian, the Sony probably has more that 2MP, but it doesn't have 14MP. The number I've heard thrown around is 3.6MP. But who knows if that's right. __________________ Avid Media Composer 3.1.3. Boris Red and Continuum Complete. Vegas 8.0c. TMPGEnc Xpress Pro 4.0

March 4th, 2011, 10:45 AM	#5
Aaron Newsome Major Player Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Rancho Santa Margarita Posts: 590	Re: Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? Sony published the sensor resolution of the F3 online. If I recall correctly, it was around 3.36 megapixels.

March 4th, 2011, 11:32 AM	#6
Nate Weaver Wrangler Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 2,100	Re: Does the F3 Have 5X the Light Gathering Ability of the RED EPIC? The two are probably within a stop of each other. The thing that comes to mind for me though, to get the best looking/lowest amount of noise when you're pushing the ISO on the Red, is that you have to spend the time to full resolution debayers. Half res debayers, which are acceptable for a lot of 1080p work, look worse when you boost the Red's ISO to numbers like 3200. So in one sense, there's a time penalty (or money, to use a Red Rocket in real time) to get the best high ISO images out of a Red..where the F3 does it real time to cards. __________________ My Work: nateweaver.net