|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 12th, 2011, 08:50 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Re: Yet Another F3 Low Light Test
Cine 4 takes the same 460% dynamic range as the other CG's and squeezes it into 109IRE, it's just the distribution of the mid range that's modified from one gamma to the other. CG2 is only 100IRE so slightly fewer bits of data to play with in post and the image looks a bit darker on a monitor but still has same dynamic range.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
March 12th, 2011, 12:46 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita
Posts: 590
|
Re: Yet Another F3 Low Light Test
Hi Andy. My gamma setting was CINE3. I read the manual the first day I got the camera and CINE3 sounded like what I wanted. I didn't do any testing to see for sure.
|
March 12th, 2011, 02:02 PM | #18 |
Sponsor: Abel CineTech
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 361
|
Re: Yet Another F3 Low Light Test
Well said Alister, and thanks again for the class!
Cine 3 is a good setting in general still has that 460% range and 109 white clip. Really the only difference between 3 & 4 is the mid range area is pushed up higher in 4. This may give you a little more ability in post to make adjustments. Cine 1 is your best bet for highlights because it does the opposite, a lower mid range for more highlight space. Cine 3 is right in the middle.
__________________
Andy Shipsides -Camera Technology Specialist AbelCineTech, New York - Visit our Blog - http://blog.abelcine.com |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|