August 15th, 2007, 11:39 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Tennessee USA
Posts: 28
|
Merlin Arm Vest with Glidecam 4000 Combo
This may sound strange but has anyone else considered adapting the Merlin arm and vest with a GC 4000 Pro? Reason being is I have the 4000 already and why not use it. Seems like all it would involve is a short piece of rod machined to fit mount on Steadicam arm and tube on the 4000 handle. From what I read thus far it appears the weight of 4000 sled with camera, mic, light, wide angle lense adapter, batt, etc. would be within capabilities of the arm design. Anyone see something I'm missing?
|
August 15th, 2007, 03:32 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Posts: 624
|
I can't see any reason why it wouldn't work, with the right arm-post adapter.
The arm will hold ~15lb - Mikko
__________________
Mikko Wilson - Steadicam Owner / Operator - Juneau, Alaska, USA +1 (907) 321-8387 - mikkowilson@hotmail.com - www.mikkowilson.com |
August 16th, 2007, 07:36 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Tennessee USA
Posts: 28
|
Thanks for your reply Mikko. The only thing that kind of concerns me is the clearance between operator's legs and the sled part of the GC4000. But, if the arm allows enough forward extension away from the operator's body to clear the sled without causing stability issues, then it should work fine. Would not think it would be that much different than the Steadicam Pilot sled.
I'm about to put the Steadicam arm and vest on order. B&H shows no stock so don't know how long it will take to evaluate, plus I have to make the adapter post. Again, thanks for your observation. Tom |
August 16th, 2007, 10:03 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Port Jefferson, New York
Posts: 62
|
is there a huge difference between smoothshooter and merlin amr/vest
|
August 16th, 2007, 11:04 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York, Boston
Posts: 54
|
Yes, the difference is quite significant. The two biggest differences are the dual-segment design and iso-elastic performance of the Merlin arm. Both together give the Merlin quite an edge in terms of performance.
|
August 16th, 2007, 02:23 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Tennessee USA
Posts: 28
|
I considered getting the GC Smooth Shooter rig and was about to make that purchase. Upon more research, along with a background in engineering, the Steadicam arm and vest design started to interest me. The Steadicam vest design is lighter in weight but still distributes the load, plus it would travel more compactly than the GC SS (although I'm not a big fan of all the velcro). More importantly though, the double articulated arm design would better dampen movements plus allowing for a much greater vertical travel range.
Only bringing all this up because I was attempting to find a use for the GC4000, without having to purchase a Merlin - having made the decision to go with the Steadicam vest and arm. Tom |
August 16th, 2007, 03:34 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Posts: 624
|
A Steadicam (/glidecam/whatever) should be operated at your side, not out in front.
Any decent stabilizer arm will allow you to place the rig at your side (in addition to allowing you to bring it across your body to the other side if necessary). - Mikko
__________________
Mikko Wilson - Steadicam Owner / Operator - Juneau, Alaska, USA +1 (907) 321-8387 - mikkowilson@hotmail.com - www.mikkowilson.com |
August 16th, 2007, 04:06 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 326
|
I wouldn't knock the Velcro until you've tried it. It works a whole lot better than some other adjustment and locking methods do, at least in my opinion. I've found it to be plenty solid, even when maxing out the springs in the arm.
|
August 16th, 2007, 07:50 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Tennessee USA
Posts: 28
|
Really appreciate everyone's comments. Looks like a marriage is in order as soon as Steadicam package is available at dealers.
Thanks........ |
June 4th, 2009, 06:33 AM | #10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7
|
Hello, just wondering if you were able to get the Glidecam 4000 to work with the Steadicam Arm & Vest. If so, what did you do to make the glidecam fit on the Steadicam arm?
|
June 17th, 2009, 04:29 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Hi Chris,
I'm running an XH-A1 on a GC 2000 on the arm and vest meant for the Merlin. Works very well. I just replaced the curved post with a straight one. |
June 23rd, 2009, 09:36 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Thomas,
We know it works as we have sold adapters to customers that connect our vest and arm to the Merlin (and JR for that matter). Our arm has the same connection as the Glidecam arm and we are told the combination works well. Good luck with you system. Tery Indicam |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|