February 25th, 2010, 02:47 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KLD, South Africa
Posts: 983
|
Steadicam Pilot vs Glidecam X-22
I currently own the Glidecam Smooth Shooter and considering an upgrade. Which stabilizer would be better? A Steadicam Pilot or Glidecam X-22? I won't fly anything bigger than an EX1/HDSLR so weight is not my primary concern. I want a rig that's smooth and allows for better control than my Smooth Shooter. The X-22 looks like a good product however I'm scared of the Glidecam brand because my Smooth Shooter sucks so much, I do like the solid feel of the Glidecam vest compared to the light weight Steadicam. Should I rather go the Steadicam Pilot route, does the Steadicam offer better value when compared to the X-22? Considering that the X-22 and Pilot is so closely priced it's a tough decision.
Does the monitors on these stabilizers support HDMI inputs? How would I connect a 5DII/7D to the monitor? I would welcome any advice. |
February 25th, 2010, 03:16 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Hi Nicholas:
If you are definitely not planning on flying cameras that will take you over the Pilot's weight limit, you are better off with the Pilot, in my opinion. The X22 is not a bad rig but the Pilot is a great one. The arm and gimbal are the critical elements of any rig, and the Pilot is the hands-down winner here. There is now an upgrade with the vest that includes buckles which you will likely want. The vest is certainly lighterweight than the GC version but it provides all the support you'll need with that little rig. I wore it for a couple of hours and didn't find it lacking in that regard. You can use the composite output of the 5D/7D/1D to feed into your rig. Naturally this will be a standard-def image. Down the road if you are so inclined you can replace the monitor with an HD one but you will likely have to use a cable running outside the post (not the end of the world, I've been working that way for a while).
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
February 26th, 2010, 01:07 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KLD, South Africa
Posts: 983
|
Charles thank you for your input.
|
February 26th, 2010, 02:38 AM | #4 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
I'm also interested to an upgrade regarding the tiltable top stage: do you think Steadicam will supply something? Thanks in advance. Ciao, Emanuele |
|
February 26th, 2010, 03:03 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
|
February 26th, 2010, 03:32 AM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 5
|
Reading an old post from Mikko Wilson (Tiffen announces new low cost Steadicams at NAB 07 - *** Now Shipping! *** - Page 5 - DVXuser.com -- The online community for filmmaking) when Steadicam introduced the Pilot, it seemed that this option was considered by Tiffen. I was wondering if, three years after, the tilt stage would be available at some point. :)
Ciao, Emanuele |
February 26th, 2010, 04:40 AM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Who knows what NAB will bring (well, I do know one thing, but it doesn't affect these rigs...). Don't think we'll see a mod to the existing Pilot with tilt head but there has been hope to integrate that through the product line.
I've asked the folks at the factory to send me pix of the buckle mod, hasn't happened yet.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
February 26th, 2010, 04:42 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
Note that you can tilt the whole sled in a few seconds by trimming the stage balance knob. I use this all the time. Normal panning and framing seems to work fine with this. The only down-side with this approach is that you can't do a precise whip-pan when the whole sled is balanced on a tilt. But this has never been a problem for me, since whip-pans are fairly uncommon. The one time a director/DP asked for a fast whip ending in a really precise frame, we ended up doing it backwards. In other words, I framed the thing, let it sit still for a while, then just panned away really fast. In post, they reversed the footage, so it looked like a super-fast whip coming into a nice solid frame. That reminds me, I need a copy of that footage. Anyway, hope this helps. |
|
February 26th, 2010, 05:44 AM | #9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 5
|
Dave
Thanks for the tip! I'm a completely video/steadicam newbie so all the suggestions from the experts are valuable for me and really appreciated. The Merlin setup arrived last week and I've had no difficulties to balance it with various camera/lenses configurations: I've put also a Zacuto mini base plate with no excessive worries. Anyway the arm+vest are a must-have with heavier camera/lens combos. Charles Searched the internet and found the product code (Tiffen part no. 801-7816) along some images of the upgraded vest here: Steadicam Pilot - new buckles available - DVXuser.com -- The online community for filmmaking As you can see, it seems that only one side receives the buckles while the other one still relies on velcro: it should be fine, probably, because one will never use again the velcro straps to dress/undress the vest. Ciao, Emanuele |
February 26th, 2010, 11:22 AM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
The reverse footage trick is often helpful. Say you film somebody sitting down and later standing up. If the standing up footage has a problem, reversing the sitting down footage and editing at just the right points can save a re-shoot.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|