|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 5th, 2004, 06:13 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 357
|
300 f4 L vs. 100-400 L?
Trying to decide between these two lenses for bird photography (on a digital rebel). Plus maybe on an XL-2 in the future. I realize the prime may be a little sharper and faster, but the zoom a little more versatile and greater magnification.
Any opinions?
__________________
Jeff Price Flickerflix Nature Videos flickerflix@yahoo.com |
December 5th, 2004, 06:43 PM | #2 |
Skyonic New York
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 614
|
i'm in the same cirle as you...and here is how i made my choice
the 300 by all counts is sharper, faster and lighter the 100-400 is more versitle and has more range... for me the most important factor is sharpness, then lens weight... i'm going with the 300, also a bit cheaper try these links http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=39&sort=7&thecat=2 http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=19&sort=7&thecat=27 |
December 6th, 2004, 05:14 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 151
|
If it's bird photography you're after, I'd go with the 100-400.
I have, the 400 f/5.6 and I still wish I had more reach. Of course the 300 is significantly sharper, but the 100-400 can produce some very sharp images, plus it's versatile. They both have the IS if I'm not mistaken. Have you conscidered the 400 5.6. The images are very sharp and since I shoot in broad daylight, I don't have any issues withthe speed. Picked mine up used for $900 and I love it. |
December 9th, 2004, 07:56 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,828
|
Don't forget to get a good monopod with it, and don't waste money putting a head on a monopod.
Steve
__________________
www.CorporateShow.com Been at this so long I'm rounding my years of experience down...not up! |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|