|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 28th, 2005, 02:45 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
144 MP digital camera
http://www.betterlight.com/eModels.asp
|
March 28th, 2005, 04:39 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 607
|
How about 1000MP+ digital camera
|
March 29th, 2005, 11:41 PM | #3 |
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
|
Scanning backs have been around for a while. Their most common application is to shoot flat art work for high-detail reproduction. Their drawback, aside from cost, is their relatively slow speed. Although some photographers have taken them into the field for landscape work these rigs are basically at their best in highly controlled studio conditions...not something you'll use to shoot the family at Christmas.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission. Hey, you don't have enough stuff! Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really! See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com |
March 31st, 2005, 05:32 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 151
|
I'll take two ;=)
|
April 2nd, 2005, 06:52 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 123
|
We had one in school. It was a real PITA to use. The school only had 650 watt hot lights and you couldn't check out enough of them to get a decent f-stop. It also took about 2 minutes to make the exposure and if anything moved the least little bit during that time the picture was ruined.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|