|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 31st, 2005, 10:31 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burnaby, B.C. Canada
Posts: 50
|
Old Rebel G lens with digital body
Can the old Rebel G lens fit on the body of the Digital Rebel?
Thanks |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2005, 12:00 AM
|
#2 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
If it is an EF lens (I think the whole Rebel line is), then yes.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
|
|
|
April 3rd, 2005, 08:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
You could. But why would you want to?
That freebie Rebel G lens is that the very bottom of the EF food chain. I don't think you can even give one away anymore. Putting it on a digital SLR would be doing a serious injustice to the camera. Try the EF 28-135mm image stabilzed USM lens instead, under $500. |
|
|
|
|
April 4th, 2005, 09:25 AM
|
#4 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Another vote for the 28-135mm IS USM. I used that on both my Digital Rebel and 10D. I also got great performance out of the Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM ($599).
How does the old Rebel G lens compare to the 18-55mm sub $100 lens on the D. Rebel? |
|
|
|
|
April 4th, 2005, 10:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Yet a third vote for the 28-135mm IS.
I bought mine for my 10d and love it (except it isn't wide enough with the crop factor). It completely outperforms the cheap Canon lenses I used to have. I'll never go back. Completely not worth it UNLESS you just don't have the cash.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
