|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 2nd, 2005, 06:26 PM | #1 | |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
Subject of long distance shot sues
Interesting information for our licensing concerns...
Quote:
__________________
-- Visit http://www.KeithLoh.com | stuff about living in Vancouver | My Flickr photo gallery |
|
July 2nd, 2005, 07:00 PM | #2 |
Capt. Quirk
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Middle of the woods in Georgia
Posts: 3,596
|
Always get the model release forms signed.
__________________
www.SmokeWagonLeather.us |
July 2nd, 2005, 07:18 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Can't say I wouldn't sue, cause I sure would too.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
July 3rd, 2005, 05:49 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
If the plaintiff wins this case it sure will put a damper on fine-arts photography. The general practice has been AFAIK that a release wasn't needed if the subject was shot in a public place and the resulting images weren't being used for advertising purposes. Many of the great fine-arts photos of the 19th and 20th centuries were shot where I'm certain no release exists.
|
July 7th, 2005, 09:49 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 270
|
I wonder if the $20K per pop he was selling them for had anything to do with the subject filing suit?
__________________
"the difference between an amateur photographer and a professional is the amateur shows you all his pictures" |
July 10th, 2005, 03:28 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
Good luck. Dennis |
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|