![]() |
Burning a wooden shack in the forest?
I need to burn an old wooden shack (20 X 30, one story) in the forest. However, I have neither the resources nor the budget to build a real shack and burn it for real (the land owner won't risk his trees). How realistic is the CGI solution? If we build the shack ourselves and make it look like charred remains, how easy will it be to add flames in post?
I've seen some pretty bad CGI fires, but I guess I wouldn't recognize the really good ones as fake (which is what would make them good ;-) ). Are there links to videos on the web showing this effect done convincingly? |
Don't use CGI flames if you want a believable look. Detonation Films might have something readily available for you to order or maybe Artbeats - Royalty Free HD Stock Footage for the Creative Professional
Overlaying real footage has surprisingly good results. |
Quote:
J. |
Use a tripod shots and you will have a lot of options later.
|
Quote:
|
if a shack were...
to burn in the forest, and no one was there to see it....
What if you just had a smoldering shack, and let the audience fill in the idea of the flames? Maybe reveal a shack that just burned down? this could allow for the use of small -controllable flames if actual flames were needed... Just thinking from a cheap mindset. Mike W. |
Quote:
Quote:
J. |
This is kind of involved, but you could build a 1/3 or 1/4 scale miniature of the shack and burn THAT... easier to control than burning the real one, and you could probably get away with not showing very much of the surroundings.
|
Regarding real fire, my suggestion is not to light so much as a match without full permits, insurance, trained crew, fire brigade and any and all other requirements outlined in the the law.
A fire getting out of hand is a serious criminal offense, possibly leading to manslaughter charges if someone dies as a result of the fire. The implications of thousands of acres of destroyed forest and property are also serious. |
Quote:
J. |
I'm with Emma on this one, if you build a model (the bigger the better the flames will scale) and place it well away from his trees and use a bit of forced perspective filming from in amongst the trees (like 50 yards back or something) it should be pretty effective. A model like that is simple and cheap to build and personally id shoot at the telephoto end of the lense for the depth of field.
Only thing stopping you here is your diy skills Andy. PS. I know Jack is the word of reason here and is just looking out for your safety and to any other people reading with the same idea as you but the truth is you have to be hollywood to afford the list of requirements he made.........thats why we call it guerilla filmmaking.......crazy not stupid (i'll play the little devil on your other shoulder) |
Quote:
J. |
What about tossing a smoke bomb in the shack? Might make overlaying stock fire footage easier.
|
Personally, I would burn a model against greenscreen and comp it into a wide forest shot for the wide, and get closeups and pans across the model as it burned. I would also make sure to overcrank everything, I've found that fire in miniature looks more realistic in slow mo for some reason.
The downside to this is that fire and smoke is hell to get a clean chromakey pull from. I don't know what you're shooting on but I wouldn't try this with HDV or lower. That's assuming you can't get away with the forced perspective trick that Andy mentioned. |
My vote is with the model, green screen approach. If you do it outdoors in full sun I'll bet you won't even need to light it.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network