|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 8th, 2007, 01:59 PM | #16 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Esbjerg
Posts: 9
|
"Sånger från andra våningen" is a featurefilm with only static shots.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120263/ |
February 8th, 2007, 02:01 PM | #17 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
A good mix on longer films is always good, too. I have a friend that does one thing for everything...handheld. It gets REALLY old after a while.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
May 18th, 2009, 08:51 PM | #18 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 9
|
A few suggestions
For sound issues it makes sense to stay in one place with the camera...unless your actors have wireless mics, then you can do whatever you want and have the same volume...if you are using your cam's on board mic for sound then you SHOULD stay in one place.
If you are filming a scene where you won't be using any sound...I would say move around. You could film out of a slow moving car or in a wheelbarrow...there are so many ways to move without too much camera shake...While filming Evil Dead, Sam Raimi used to grease up a 2x4 with Vasoline and slide the camera along it. I would suggest...unless you are using a Wireless or a Boom Mic...stay in one place for Dialogue Scenes...and move around for most others |
May 25th, 2009, 10:57 AM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gautier, MS
Posts: 175
|
I don't think anyone said it's the best low budget movie ever made but it is a good example of what the OP was asking about.
|
May 26th, 2009, 09:36 AM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 140
|
The problem with static shots is that the video risks having that "flat" look to it. Dimensionality comes from changing the position of the subject or the camera, or both. You could add a lot of visual interest with just something simple like this www.glidetrack.com
|
August 6th, 2009, 02:07 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Static shots can work. Just make sure you put the effort into editing. Try experimenting with shot length ... think of it like the beat of a song. You can mess with the viewers perception of time fairly easily.
If you want a moment to seem drawn out, it's been said that all you need to do is keep the shots at a steady pace ... like 3 or 4 seconds per shot, no variation. If you want to speed things up a little, try varying the shot lengths more.
__________________
Late December. A feature film by Matthew Overstreet & Christopher J. Adams. |
August 6th, 2009, 02:19 PM | #22 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
I would say don't be afraid to pan and tilt unless you find this an interesting challenge to work in. I think "In the Mood For Love" was all static, although I really thought every movie had pans or tilts. If you are familiar with that cinematographer, he's always kinetic (ashes of time redux, fallen angels, chungking express) but the director thought it would be an interesting challenge to use only stagnant shots. |
|
January 7th, 2010, 10:24 PM | #23 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 22
|
Seun, in general, be a slave to your story. If that means it must all be done with static shots, so be it. But don't force it into a box it doesn't fit in.
|
January 8th, 2010, 01:18 PM | #24 |
LA FCP UG
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LA CA
Posts: 340
|
Francis Coppola's recent film Tetro was all locked off
|
January 18th, 2010, 10:42 AM | #25 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Very interesting. Much thought had to go into the shots, and the actions that would take place within those shots (not many, in this case). Nice work! Lee |
|
January 18th, 2010, 10:52 AM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
I just shot my feature film with nothing but static shots and really long takes. I guess you could consider it a somewhat experimental style, but it worked fairly well and principle photography was a breeze.
You'd think the style would be boring, but we kept the turning points going and we have a lot of room for error since it's a somewhat voyeuristic feeling... it keeps you interested.
__________________
Late December. A feature film by Matthew Overstreet & Christopher J. Adams. |
January 18th, 2010, 10:56 AM | #27 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
=] Lee |
|
January 18th, 2010, 11:10 AM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Yes, we just finished principle photography last Thursday.
We've got a rough cut together, it came in at about an hour and thirty three minutes. We put together a trailer based off that rough cut and the sound is VERY... rough. The audio was probably the worst part of the entire production, but I've got someone who can clean it up and all that good stuff. We've shown it to a few select individuals and reactions were positive. I'm happy. Not too sure where we're going to go with it yet, debating whether we should go for local festivals or higher end fests. I guess anything is worth a shot.
__________________
Late December. A feature film by Matthew Overstreet & Christopher J. Adams. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|