|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 25th, 2008, 01:15 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 3274
|
November 25th, 2008, 01:34 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Good stuff, Glen. On the opening shot I couldn't help but notice you weren't locked down on a tripod. For those establishing "still" shots I think that's just about a requirement. I know how it is shooting run'n'gun, though. I'm just trying to make a rule for myself now not to cheat and try and shoot off the tripod when I should be on the tripod, ya know?
Anyways, the rest was great. I don't know if this couple was all about family, but you did an excellent job of capturing the faces and emotions of the people who were there. I thought you did especially well at capturing the boy, who I'm sure is pretty important to them. You labeled this video a trailer, but it plays more like a highlights video to me. I expect a trailer to be fairly short (30-90 seconds) and really skip through the day quickly. Not a big deal .. just the length and format surprised me. You mentioned A1's and FCP, so I have two questions. First, are you using a preset with the A1's or shooting flat and grading in post? Second, are you doing your titling within FCP or something else? I tried LiveType and it feels like more of a hassle than it's worth, especially when Motion actual has more variables/effects for type. |
November 25th, 2008, 01:49 AM | #3 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Regarding the A1's- I think I'm very different in my approach as I like to get the image as close as possible to ideal right out of the camera. The only filters I used in this were an occasional vignette, and light sky grad (MB looks) on the beach stuff. Usually the only filter I use is a vignette when I feel the shot can benefit from it. Otherwise the colors and exposure are AS-IS directly out of the camera. My workflow is this way because, as you see, I don't apply heavy filtering or color grade my work. I don't feel the heavy graded look is conducive to my style- which I try to keep light (not overly "cinematic") with an emphasis on shot progression and story-telling. Regarding titling I keep it simple in this regard as well. I use the built in "text" tool in FCP. All in all in the past 2 years I've moved into a very straight forward, stripped-down approach to my work. I don't work with slow-motion, dissolves, or heavy filtering. So really I could be editing on pretty much any NLE out there, I just so happen to prefer OSX over Vista/Windows. |
|
November 25th, 2008, 07:12 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
|
Hey Glen,
Fantastic job on the trailer. It did feel like more of a trailer as Travis pointed out but it was quite engaging. Love the transition you did to get to the reception with the sunset. Very goo cut of the bride feeding the cake. You hit that cut to the next angle seamlessly. Who helped you on this job? Was it Darrell or your other assistant? Thanks for sharing Glen. I always enjoy viewing your videos. Monday |
November 25th, 2008, 12:18 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Hey Monday- both Darrell and my fiance helped out on this job. Thanks for the kind words.
|
November 25th, 2008, 12:31 PM | #6 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
I've found that the text tool in FCP can sometimes not look good. For example, in my trailer I started out with FCP text and it looked fine. But once I added motion to the text via keyframes, the letters would bounce and flicker while they were moving. Bringing in text with movement from Motion solved that. Very odd that you can't get FCP text to move without issues in FCP. I don't use a lot of moving text, though, so usually the standard FCP text tool works fine. I think you're other work looks great too by the way. |
|
November 25th, 2008, 01:27 PM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
|
|
November 25th, 2008, 02:25 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 446
|
Hey Glen....I thought this was nicely done and looked really clean. Did you light the church at all...it looked really good. The golden hour really made the beachfront home pop.
|
November 25th, 2008, 04:46 PM | #9 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Thanks again for the kind words. |
|
November 25th, 2008, 04:50 PM | #10 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Hey John, how are you? No I didn't light the church at all- the church was pretty dark actually. Those shots at the alter were 1/24th with 12db of gain. Luckily the gain noise produced by the A1s is luma as opposed to chroma which masks it quite well. Especially on a downconversion for the web.
|
November 25th, 2008, 04:53 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 446
|
Quote:
We are doing well...hope to see you and the sidekick in Austin :) |
|
November 26th, 2008, 01:05 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 407
|
Hey glen,
whats the name of that song, pretty cool sound track
__________________
Rob. www.rpbproductions.com robert@rpbproductions.com HD101/G5 Mac/4gig Ram/1TB HDD/30" Cinema Display/FCP. |
November 26th, 2008, 01:16 AM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Glen, when you have plenty of light are you using a 0db gain setting or a -3db gain setting?
|
November 26th, 2008, 04:19 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Amersfoort, Netherlands
Posts: 85
|
@Robert: It's "Vive la vida" by Coldplay.
The whole album (which has the same name) is fantastic. |
November 29th, 2008, 07:17 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
|
as usual, the reception lighting is perfect. loved it man.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|