|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 20th, 2014, 06:44 AM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK/Yorkshire
Posts: 2,069
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
A little off-topic but taking up Roger's point about camera failure - during the ceremony/speeches I have a CX730 slung around my neck so I can lock off my camera and get some cutaways, but it would also come into play if my main camera went down.
Pete |
November 20th, 2014, 07:22 AM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Crookston, MN
Posts: 1,353
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Adrian, the correct probability is always the same. If a card fails one out of 1000 times, that will stay true.
Then, the chance that two of your cards will fail at the same time is 1/1000X1000, or 1 in 1,000,000. Back to the original question, I like to use 32GB cards, and we switch them out as we move between the 3 main parts of the day: before, during, and after the ceremony. With 3 cameras of coverage, if one card failed, we're not completely and utterly screwed. |
November 20th, 2014, 12:56 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 255
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Roger, now I'm tempted to have a backup vehicle at all times in case my car dies!
|
November 20th, 2014, 04:04 PM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: LIncolnshire, UK
Posts: 2,213
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
|
November 20th, 2014, 05:45 PM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Hey Robert, let me have one more go at persuading you, because this question bugs me! And if this attempt fails, I promise I'll stop annoying everyone and won’t say another word about probability (but will be happy to read anyone’s correction to my half-remembered maths).
I flip a coin twice. What are the possible combinations? HH HT TT TH And they’re all equally likely, right? Question 1: What is the chance that I flip no heads at all? Well, there’s only one combination out of four that has no heads. So the probability is 1/4, right? Question 2: What is the chance that I flip at least one head? Well, you could work it out by counting how many combinations out of four contain at least one head (ie, three). Or you could say the probability is: 1 - (chance of no heads) = 1 - 1/4 = 3/4 I then flip the coin a third time. HHH HHT HTH HTT TTT THT TTH THH Question 3: What is the chance that you've got at least one head over the course of the previous three flips? By similar reasoning, it’s 7/8 (I'm hoping you'll agree). 7/8 is larger than 3/4, so the upshot is that the more you flip, the higher the chance that you’ll have flipped at least one head. (Or: the more memory cards you use, the higher the chance that at least one will be faulty.) I then flip the coin one more time. Question 4: What is the chance that it’s a head? Well, possible outcomes are: H T and the number of combinations that contain a head is one. So the chance is 1/2. All the previous flips don’t affect the next flip. Incidentally, if one really wanted to think like a robot, it's actually possible to go a step further beyond probability and apply "decision theory". To cut a long story short, I think the four-card choice vs the one-card choice, on decision theory, is the rational choice. Won't bore everyone with the explanation. |
November 20th, 2014, 05:55 PM | #21 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Crookston, MN
Posts: 1,353
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Quote:
----------- Our problem, of course, is that we're talking about our gear. We have no idea what the actual failure rate is for our memory cards, and the longer we use them, the higher that failure rate likely is. It doesn't mean its likely to fail, though, from a math point of view. From a practical point of view, none of us take that chance, though. I'm sure we'd all say that, the day you're not prepared is the day something will break or fail for you. We just all have to balance convenience to safety. I like 32GB cards and start fresh for the ceremony, then new cards once its over, etc. That's not really my safety measure. Running 3 cameras is (and I'll move to 4 soon). This protects me both from equipment failure, and from bad situations, like obstructed views. Same reason most of us use more than one audio recording method. |
|
November 20th, 2014, 07:24 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Hey Adrian
OK so the bottom line is that you need a backup for everything ...spare car, spare clothes, spare cameras, batteries, tripods, lights, and the list just goes on and on. I think this really comes down to being practical surely?? Carry spare cards and batteries with you but don't become obsessive about failing gear ... The likelihood of it happening is very remote so rather enjoy filming your weddings and let the gear look after itself Chris |
November 20th, 2014, 10:46 PM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Dice don't have any mean time between failure...
Because electronics DO, there should always be a clause in the contract/retainer limiting exposure to the original amount paid (for a full catastrophe, or loss/theft), or a part thereof, should there be an "equipment malfunction". While any piece of electronics CAN fail, generally if it works initially (burn in or a few usage cycles), it will work for quite some time if not subject to abuse (liqiud, impact, crushing). This is presuming that you're not buying fakes/knockoffs or substandard quality products. It's quite likely that decent quality cards will become unusable due to a requirement for larger file sizes or faster speeds before they "wear out" due to read/write cycles... my 8G cards are still working just fine, but when shooting XAVCS, 64 and 128G are the rule... |
November 21st, 2014, 04:15 AM | #24 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: LIncolnshire, UK
Posts: 2,213
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
Dave is absolutely right, rather than failing, cards etc tend to become obsolete as the technology progresses.
Another point is that card failure is more likely to be as a result of mishandling or placing somewhere where there is a high electro/magnetic risk. If a card is working fine in my camera at the start of the day, it is unlikely to suddenly fail. There is a remote chance of failure on removal by damage to the contacts, so the footage could be downloaded before removal to prevent that possibility. I also like to make sure that the performance requirement of the camera doesn't exceed the performance of the card, to avoid glitches and lockups etc. Roger |
November 21st, 2014, 12:48 PM | #25 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
And I'd point out that there have been "found" cards that were lost by their owners when the cam went overboard or down a crevasse or into a mudslide... and the images were recoverable.
Generally speaking, short of destruction, or an EMP, cards tend to be fairly reliable - some manufacturers do list use cycles or such that can give you some idea of "potential" failure rates, and I really suspect if a card is "good" through a couple write/read cycles, it's probably good for more than most of us will ever shoot before it's obsolete and no longer big enough or fast enough to hold our files... |
November 21st, 2014, 12:54 PM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 883
|
Re: One point of failure vs many?
This kind of thing has always been a concern and now that I'm charging much more than I did years ago... the thought of a failure is always at the front of my mind when setting up.
This is why I shoot all wedding ceremonies with 4 or 5 cameras and individual audio recorders with wireless and wired mics going to my main cam and DR40. As far as cards go, that's what I love about the Sony NX5. I get an instant backup to the FMU128 in real time. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|