|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 30th, 2011, 03:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Cs 5 vs 5.5
I think its great Adobe updated all their apps but I only really care about Premiere Pro and maybe Encore. Is there a dumbed downn list somewhere that shows excatly whats new in Premiere CS 5.5? I am mainly about performance and work flow now not so much CUDA but I just want fast AVCHD editing.
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 09:02 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 710
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
improved trial version for Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 Premiere Pro work area
Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5: What’s new and changed Premiere Pro work area http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/tech-specs.html Adobe Media Encoder CS5.5: What’s new and changed Premiere Pro work area Encore stays pretty much the same. |
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 11:25 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chester, North West
Posts: 565
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
So is CS5.5 just an paid update file or is it a complete new install?
|
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 12:39 PM
|
#4 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
New install.
|
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 01:39 PM
|
#5 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Thanks thats the info I was looking for. BTW does anyone know if the CUDA engine is used in Encore for rendering? If not I guess I need to render in Premiere before bringing it into Encore?
|
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 03:33 PM
|
#6 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Randy,
I have not tried it, so I'm not 100% sure, but logic says Encore does not use hardware MPE. Just as AE does not use hardware MPE, even though AE is 64 bit. Why? 1. Encore is still a 32 bit application with all the inherent limitations. 2. Hardware MPE is only used for some transitions, effects, blending, scaling and blurring. 3. Encoding is NOT hardware assisted. It is purely a CPU matter. |
|
|
|
|
May 1st, 2011, 10:40 PM
|
#7 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
I understand why it doesnt but dont you think it should? I mean if I have a Premiere time line then I use Dynamic link to go to Encore to make the DVD doesnt Encore have to do the rendering?
|
|
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2011, 06:21 PM
|
#8 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: philippines
Posts: 51
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
so do you guys see any compelling reason to upgrade?
|
|
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2011, 06:30 PM
|
#9 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Not for me.
|
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2011, 12:05 AM
|
#10 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 495
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Getting Adobe audition in a newer version would be my only reason for uograding - but I can wait for the next Premiere upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2011, 02:11 AM
|
#11 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
I swear that I read about automatic audio syncing just like Plural Eyes.
Check out the auto-stabilizing effect in AE - it is AMAZING! AME can now encode to multiple formats - NO need for Telestream, Squeeze or other costly encoders. EDIT: I take my last comment back. I read about its Watch folders. ALL of this is currently available in CS5. I usually defend Adobe but this is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2011, 02:30 AM
|
#12 |
|
Adobe Systems
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 85
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
> I swear that I read about automatic audio syncing just like Plural Eyes.
You can synch according to timecode, numbered markers, or In or Out points. Ann has already provided links to my posts with the details of what's new and changed. I'm happy to answer any questions about the new and changed features. One thing to note is that the trial version of Premiere Pro CS5.5 is fully functional (unlike in the past), so you can see for yourself whether it's worth upgrading for you. |
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2011, 02:32 AM
|
#13 |
|
Adobe Systems
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 85
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Actually, it looks like Ann didn't give the details for what's new and changed in After Effects CS5.5, so here's that link.
|
|
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2011, 03:15 PM
|
#14 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Actually I did read about a automatic lip sync feature in CS 5.5 like the one thats going to be in the new FCP X. Its a shamee that a company like pluar eyes makes such a nice piece of software just to be made obsolete shortly after its release. you guys remember a company called United Media they made a program called "multi-cam" It had way too little way too late and cost way too much but it was made obsolete when companies started integrating multi-cam features right into the software without the need for a plug-in.
|
|
|
|
|
May 6th, 2011, 11:00 AM
|
#15 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 230
|
Re: Cs 5 vs 5.5
Does the Plural Eyes software truly sync files automatically just by looking at the waveform? If it does then that would be better than the CS5/5.5 method of manually adding markers to each audio clip in the timeline and then using the "Sync" command.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
