DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon Cinema EOS Camera Systems (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-cinema-eos-camera-systems/)
-   -   C100 and handholding (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-cinema-eos-camera-systems/525437-c100-handholding.html)

Kathy Smith October 17th, 2014 02:21 PM

C100 and handholding
 
I'd like to try shooting handheld using my C100. What's the best way to go about it, shoulder mount? Or something else?

Eddy Yazbeck October 17th, 2014 03:26 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
the best rig to have is simply a monopod, Manfrotto 561 BHDV has been my weapon of choice for years, this thing beats any shoulder rig or any handheld setup, especially with the tilt and pan features.

otherwise i would suggest using 24-105 with IS on, installing an eyecup on the c100 and shooting with the eyecup pressed against your face.

Kathy Smith October 17th, 2014 04:28 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Thanks, I do have a monopod and love it. I wasn't sure if there was a better way of doing this. What if I wanted follow focus?

Michael Thames October 17th, 2014 06:04 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kathy Smith (Post 1865271)
Thanks, I do have a monopod and love it. I wasn't sure if there was a better way of doing this. What if I wanted follow focus?

A monopod doesn't help much if you are walking around, it's only good stationary..... might just as well use a tripod.

I took a monopod with me to India this year..... I had a hellava time using the follow focus, and zoom together while trying to hold the monopod still. When I got to Thailand I left the damn thing in the hotel room so I didn't have to bring it home with me.

Other than that, Phillip Bloom had a nice set up in his revere of the C100.

Eddy Yazbeck October 17th, 2014 10:52 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Thames (Post 1865273)
A monopod doesn't help much if you are walking around, it's only good stationary..... might just as well use a tripod.

I took a monopod with me to India this year..... I had a hellava time using the follow focus, and zoom together while trying to hold the monopod still. When I got to Thailand I left the damn thing in the hotel room so I didn't have to bring it home with me.

Other than that, Phillip Bloom had a nice set up in his revere of the C100.


The weight and the vertical inertia of the monopod makes it much steadier than handheld while walking ,most of time when I use it it's fully closed and standing n my thigh im able to zoom and focus with my left hand very easily and fast , I find a follow focus is usless while runing and guning handheld.

Matt Davis October 18th, 2014 08:16 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
P+S Technik recently had a go at redefining the monopod:

ProShot DSLR Rig 1192

The trouble with this is, and monopods in general, is that with a C100 it's going to be top-heavy.

A super-light monopod stuffed into a shoulder-strap 'ceremonial flag holder' thing is still an oldie but a goodie that's worth considering. You can, with a stiff enough monopod, do some faux crane stuff and just about squeeze off a few high shots by shooting almost blind.

However, getting an extra 1 meter of height makes such a difference - hence the press-shooter's favourite: the small ultralight step-ladder. LOL

Michael Thames October 18th, 2014 09:29 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eddy Yazbeck (Post 1865286)
The weight and the vertical inertia of the monopod makes it much steadier than handheld while walking ,most of time when I use it it's fully closed and standing n my thigh im able to zoom and focus with my left hand very easily and fast , I find a follow focus is usless while runing and guning handheld.

For me even holding it still trying balance it, and operating the zoom and focus was more than I could bare..... if I had one extra arm then it would have worked for me..... but I only have two.

I learned a trick with my 5D3........ put the strap on around your neck, then pull it tight using the camera..... the strap pulled tight around your neck helps stabilize the camera to an amazing degree...... however you still can;t do much with the zoom and follow focus.

Kathy Smith October 19th, 2014 06:07 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Thames (Post 1865273)
A monopod doesn't help much if you are walking around, it's only good stationary..... might just as well use a tripod.

I took a monopod with me to India this year..... I had a hellava time using the follow focus, and zoom together while trying to hold the monopod still. When I got to Thailand I left the damn thing in the hotel room so I didn't have to bring it home with me.

Other than that, Phillip Bloom had a nice set up in his revere of the C100.

I disagree with this. Ever since getting my monopod I don't even touch my tripod (unless I am shooting an interview or something that I don't need to move around). It's easy to move around (no legs collapsing, fits everywhere, I can get a variety of shots). Not sure what kind of tripod you are using but I think what makes it so great is the little three legs on the bottom. I almost never zoom while shooting, though.

Michael Thames October 19th, 2014 11:17 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eddy Yazbeck (Post 1865286)
The weight and the vertical inertia of the monopod makes it much steadier than handheld while walking ,most of time when I use it it's fully closed and standing n my thigh im able to zoom and focus with my left hand very easily and fast , I find a follow focus is usless while runing and guning handheld.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kathy Smith (Post 1865357)
I disagree with this. Ever since getting my monopod I don't even touch my tripod (unless I am shooting an interview or something that I don't need to move around). It's easy to move around (no legs collapsing, fits everywhere, I can get a variety of shots). Not sure what kind of tripod you are using but I think what makes it so great is the little three legs on the bottom. I almost never zoom while shooting, though.

Mine didn't have the three feet at the bottom it was strictly a pole. B&H through it in the deal when I bought my 5D3 last year. It was at the bottom of the pole when it comes to monopods.

I seems as you said you already have a monopod so your question is obviously about something else. Phillip Bloom has a great solution at 13:30 into the video. Don't know the cost, but I hope it's more affordable than Matt Davies $1200 wonder-pod!


Noa Put October 20th, 2014 01:18 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Phillip Bloom has a great solution at 13:30 into the video. Don't know the cost, but I hope it's more affordable than Matt Davies $1200 wonder-pod!
Well, he says "zacuto" and while their products are of excellent quality they are also covered with a layer of gold, must be at these prizes they charge :)

Michael Thames October 20th, 2014 01:28 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Noa Put (Post 1865431)
Well, he says "zacuto" and while their products are of excellent quality they are also covered with a layer of gold, must be at these prizes they charge :)

Well that's when you should hit ebay and find a Chinese made alternative, but at least it gives you an idea.

Kathy Smith January 15th, 2015 10:28 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
I'm back asking the same question. Let's say you are not allowed to use a monopod or a tripod what's the best stabilization method for hand holding the C100? Any other new ideas?

Paul Ekert January 15th, 2015 03:01 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Shoulder/stock type brace on a basic rail system?

Eric C. Petrie January 15th, 2015 03:08 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 

This has been my personal favorite solution for the last year or more. It's light weight, super flexible, gets the grip in the right spot. Zacuto has just come out with the 3rd generation Recoil stuff too. The plates are a little bigger but allow for even more flexibility. What do you think of the rig in the video? Do you think it might meet your needs?

Eric Petrie
provideoandtape.com
Lease the Canon C100 for $129 a month
Lease the Sony FS7 for $248 a month

Kathy Smith January 21st, 2015 05:11 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Thank you, that Zacuto recoil looks great except the price tag, haha.

Andy Young January 21st, 2015 07:32 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
This may sound odd, but my favorite way to handhold my c100 is to simply hold it in my hand. No rig needed. I find that if I have a stabilized lens, right hand on the grip and left hand cupping the underside of the camera/lens works really solid. I find that to much other stuff gets in my way.

Jon Roemer January 21st, 2015 08:15 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Young (Post 1874311)
This may sound odd, but my favorite way to handhold my c100 is to simply hold it in my hand. No rig needed. I find that if I have a stabilized lens, right hand on the grip and left hand cupping the underside of the camera/lens works really solid. I find that to much other stuff gets in my way.

I was going to say that myself. In my case it's with the C300 but handholding, esp. with a stabilized lens, works just fine and makes you as low key as possible.

Gary Huff January 21st, 2015 08:26 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Young (Post 1874311)
I find that if I have a stabilized lens, right hand on the grip and left hand cupping the underside of the camera/lens works really solid. I find that to much other stuff gets in my way.

That's my experience as well, though for longer shots it becomes a little heavy. I think the Zacuto Recoil rig is probably the best in-between setup I have seen.

Ken Diewert January 21st, 2015 09:01 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Roemer (Post 1874314)
I was going to say that myself. In my case it's with the C300 but handholding, esp. with a stabilized lens, works just fine and makes you as low key as possible.

Same. But I put the neck strap on, and around my neck and pull it tight. I used to do this with my 5d2 all the time. With a wide or an IS lens - it holds up pretty good.

The zacuto rig looks like they want you to buy the base and keep giving them money until you run out.

Gary Huff January 21st, 2015 09:29 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Diewert (Post 1874318)
The zacuto rig looks like they want you to buy the base and keep giving them money until you run out.

What do you mean?

Kathy Smith January 22nd, 2015 04:14 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
This is interesting about not using any rigs. I was just talking to a friend about this and he basically said the same thing. Just handholding with hands, everything else gets in a way.
So if you are handholding the camera how do you manage to keep the camera in focus? (maybe that's a silly question), but let's say I want a relatively shallow depth of field, handholding the camera, keeping it in focus by using the little screen is hard, no? I haven't tried but that's what I'm thinking.

Andy Young January 22nd, 2015 08:09 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
I can still keep the front base of the camera settled in my palm and use my thumb and my index finger to pull focus. I've been doing it this way long enough that it has become second nature and I don;t really think about it.

Ken Diewert January 22nd, 2015 11:31 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Huff (Post 1874319)
What do you mean?

Hey Gary, I mean - I think the base unit will just get you started, and they want you to buy every accessory they have for it to really make it reasonably functional. And with zacuto prices, that's going to add up pretty quick. I'm all about investing to make either the client product or the work flow better, I just don't really see it in shoulder rigs. I suppose if you shoot a lot of eng style, it might work - since there are not so many off the shelf eng style cameras these days.

Ken Diewert January 22nd, 2015 11:39 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kathy Smith (Post 1874352)
This is interesting about not using any rigs. I was just talking to a friend about this and he basically said the same thing. Just handholding with hands, everything else gets in a way.
So if you are handholding the camera how do you manage to keep the camera in focus? (maybe that's a silly question), but let's say I want a relatively shallow depth of field, handholding the camera, keeping it in focus by using the little screen is hard, no? I haven't tried but that's what I'm thinking.

Kathy,

I use the push auto focus button to confirm focus - you will have to center your subject, then drift off center for preferred composition, but it works. But I spent a full 5 years focussing manually with the 5d m2, so the c100 feels almost like full auto, just by having this feature. Be careful because if you're in low light, or the subject is not very contrasty, you might end up way off. In a pinch, you can also glance at the lens barrel distance reading and estimate.

Also, it helps to be mindful of your distance to subject, and your approximate depth of field - and noticing if the subject (and you) are maintaining that distance.

Gary Huff January 22nd, 2015 11:41 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Diewert (Post 1874392)
Hey Gary, I mean - I think the base unit will just get you started, and they want you to buy every accessory they have for it to really make it reasonably functional.

From where I sit, the basic Recoil rig is all I would need. Sure, you can build it up, but you add weight and not much functionality. Though I would consider a Gratical, which is probably the cost of all those optional accessories combined!

Gary Huff January 22nd, 2015 11:43 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kathy Smith (Post 1874352)
I want a relatively shallow depth of field, handholding the camera, keeping it in focus by using the little screen is hard, no?

That's why you don't focus by eye, you focus using peaking and magnified focus assist.

Kathy Smith January 22nd, 2015 12:38 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Young (Post 1874376)
I can still keep the front base of the camera settled in my palm and use my thumb and my index finger to pull focus. I've been doing it this way long enough that it has become second nature and I don;t really think about it.

OK, I am going to start practicing this. Do you use focus assist?

Kathy Smith January 22nd, 2015 12:39 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Diewert (Post 1874394)
Kathy,

I use the push auto focus button to confirm focus - you will have to center your subject, then drift off center for preferred composition, but it works. But I spent a full 5 years focussing manually with the 5d m2, so the c100 feels almost like full auto, just by having this feature. Be careful because if you're in low light, or the subject is not very contrasty, you might end up way off. In a pinch, you can also glance at the lens barrel distance reading and estimate.

Also, it helps to be mindful of your distance to subject, and your approximate depth of field - and noticing if the subject (and you) are maintaining that distance.

Thanks Ken. I guess I always found it hard to use the crappy monitor on C100 but I will have to just practice

Kathy Smith January 22nd, 2015 12:41 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Huff (Post 1874396)
That's why you don't focus by eye, you focus using peaking and magnified focus assist.

Yes, I normally don't focus by eye and I'm not a fan of C100 screen so I have been using external screen which I won't be able to use handheld. So I just have to practice.

Ken Diewert January 22nd, 2015 12:51 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Huff (Post 1874396)
That's why you don't focus by eye, you focus using peaking and magnified focus assist.

Oh, Yes.... focus peaking is always on... gotta love the focus peaking...

Nate Haustein January 22nd, 2015 06:37 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
1 Attachment(s)
I always just smash the back of the C100 against my chest and put my left and under the "toe" to both support and focus. It's also worked really well for me to use a small EVF (for outside use) or monitor on a ball head on the front cold shoe. It becomes a very tall camera, but you have lots of points of contact, it's close to your body, and it feels very natural to me. Couple it with a good IS lens and you're set.

I use this method primarily for docu-style shooting, for more "cinematic" applications, I rig up the C100 on a Zacuto C-Shooter. The package becomes larger and more difficult to handle, but I think the handheld style looks more authentic for some reason... Gut feeling I guess, but for fast-moving docu, I much prefer the smaller package.

Kathy Smith January 23rd, 2015 05:08 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Thanks for all the tips.

Scott Lancaster January 26th, 2015 09:14 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
anyone heard of or used this? It's pricey but wow could be very useful if you need moving shots:

M?VI M5 Stabilizer | Freefly

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1057616-REG/freefly_950_00012_movi_m5_3_axis_gimbal.html

Gary Huff January 26th, 2015 09:34 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott Lancaster (Post 1874784)
anyone heard of or used this? It's pricey but wow could be very useful if you need moving shots:

Depends on how often you have a crew with you, can afford to buy/rent a wireless follow focus and a wireless monitor, or if you will one-man-crew it, have enough time to go through the setup, and are willing to let Dual Pixel AF handle everything for you.

Ken Diewert January 26th, 2015 10:04 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Scott,

This is a more affordable version by DJI that you might want to look at if you like the MOVI but not the price. I've been considering it, but really need to try it out first.

DJI Ronin 3-Axis Brushless Gimbal Stabilizer CP.ZM.000078 B&H

Gary Huff January 26th, 2015 10:07 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
The Ronin is great, but it does weigh almost twice as much as the M5. Depends on how much weight matters when you're lugging it around. Definitely more versatile if you ever upgrade to a camera that needs a sturdier rig though.

Andrew Maclaurin January 29th, 2015 11:31 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Do you all rely on the focus peaking? I find it a bit unreliable for getting critical focus.
Ken Diewert
do you use push auto focus? does that work? I guess you have to have your lens in auto or am I wrong? I have been struggling with manual focus and it's hard even with the mag function.

Gary Huff January 29th, 2015 11:46 AM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Maclaurin (Post 1875128)
Do you all rely on the focus peaking? I find it a bit unreliable for getting critical focus.

I do. Haven't had any issues with missing focus.

Andrew Maclaurin January 29th, 2015 12:46 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Gary,
what settings do you use?
I find that sometimes a big are is supposedly in focus when in fact it isn't really.

Ken Diewert January 29th, 2015 09:54 PM

Re: C100 and handholding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Maclaurin (Post 1875139)
Gary,
what settings do you use?
I find that sometimes a big are is supposedly in focus when in fact it isn't really.

I use push focus and peaking all the time... so yes the lens has to be set to auto. I trust peaking more than my eyes. And I like shallow dof, so I often use ND to open the iris a little more. I don't use the mag button as much.

The lens that I use most right now is the 17-55 EF-S f2.8 with IS.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network