Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed; with BeachTek DXA-5D and juicedLink CX231 - Page 2 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon EOS Full Frame for HD
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Canon EOS Full Frame for HD
All about using the Canon 1D X, 6D, 5D Mk. IV / Mk. III / Mk. II D-SLR for 4K and HD video recording.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 20th, 2009, 10:03 PM   #16
Wizard Status
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Fairhurst View Post
To summarize, the low-noise of the active juicedLink is excellent. I can turn it full bore and get better than 16-bit performance at most frequencies. It's a good match for the 5D2 with Magic Lantern firmware, though we might need to add some gain in the camera to capture low-level sounds or a dull mic. The BeachTek5D combos are noisy, but smooth. The MicroTrack II really needs an active preamp to mask its patterned noise.
That's great news and gives us some further direction for things to try. One easy change is to set the in-camera mic gain to the first step of +10 dB (MGAIN2-0=100). I'm really pleased to hear how successful your results have been in testing the new firmware!
Tramm Hudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20th, 2009, 10:26 PM   #17
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tramm Hudson View Post
That's great news and gives us some further direction for things to try. One easy change is to set the in-camera mic gain to the first step of +10 dB (MGAIN2-0=100).
I think that's totally viable. Right now, the noise is below the 16-bit threshold, yet, the 12 dB of digital gain is throwing away two bits. 10 dB of analog gain should be perfect. If we get a good balance, then the final firmware could control the digital gain only.

Quote:
I'm really pleased to hear how successful your results have been in testing the new firmware!
It's been challenging to do right, but seeing and hearing the results is exhilarating!
__________________
Jon Fairhurst
Jon Fairhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 12:16 AM   #18
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
First results

Here's a 480x270 video that demonstrates my early results (right click to download):
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMa...rstResults.m4v You can even play it on your iPhone.

And here's a zipped 24-bit wave file for critical listening:
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMa...rstResults.zip

As mentioned earlier, I calibrated everything with the NT1-A and ran some noise tests. This evening I went outside and recorded some real-world stuff with the calibrated settings, using an Audio Technica AT815b long shotgun above my head. (This is one of the few times when I want the boom mic in the shot!)

In post, I added a 19.740 Hz notch to the BeachTek/5D2 pilot tone audio. I also felt that it was on the hot side, so I lowered the level by 3.5dB in post. That reduces its noise a bit. I also thought that the juicedLink/MagicLantern result might be a bit cold - I think the mic was a touch further from my mouth - so I boosted it by 2dB. I then boosted the whole project by 6dB, so we don't have to turn our amplifiers up quite so high to hear the details.

As expected, the juicedLink/Magic Lantern combo wins the day. The noise is wonderfully low.

BTW, I didn't get the MicroTrack II direct recording to work, due to operator error and failing light. Trust me that it's not much good without a preamp to give it a hand.

I'll work with Tramm to boost the gain in the Magic Lantern firmware. That will let me calibrate again with the BeachTek at full tilt, which will put it in its best light.

Anyway, download and watch this early result. Listen to the uncompressed audio. Let me know which combo you prefer - and if you think it is of pro quality.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst
Jon Fairhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 12:26 AM   #19
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
Jon, you have linked to the same file twice, sure that was not intended. Both mv4, and no zip link.

I listened to the tests via the .mv4 files and it is clealy looking like we are going to be able to get pretty clean sound out of the Juiced Link Magic Lantern combo.

Thanks for the test results.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos
Chris Barcellos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 12:35 AM   #20
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Barcellos View Post
Jon, you have linked to the same file twice, was that intended. Both mv4.
Fixed. Thanks, Chris!
__________________
Jon Fairhurst
Jon Fairhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 02:35 AM   #21
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Fairhurst View Post
Here's a 480x270 video that demonstrates my early results
Anyway, download and watch this early result. Listen to the uncompressed audio. Let me know which combo you prefer - and if you think it is of pro quality.
Wonderful. To my non-pro ears the juicedlink/magic lantern combo was easily the best, and if I understand correctly it seems like you can get it even better. There was some noticeable rumble in the juicedlink/magic lantern section that started as you crumpled the paper: I assume that was caused by the breeze.

Thanks very much for the tests.
Jeremy Nicholl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 08:06 AM   #22
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 170
And here's a zipped 24-bit wave file for critical listening:
http://p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/5DMa...rstResults.zip

Wow.....what a dramatic difference of noise levels in the tests.. The juiced link / ML sounds spectacular. As an editor I have no problem with the audio generated by this combo
of equipment. It exceeds my expectations of performance.
Tom Daigon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 05:22 PM   #23
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
That was awesome! Great Real-World example. So simple, even I understood it, and What a difference!!!
I'm SO glad I waited before buying the Beachtek. You guys saved me a LOT of money. I owe ya!
Thank you for all your efforts!
Matthew Roddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2009, 08:26 PM   #24
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
Jon Fairhurst. Send Me PM so I send you information on monitoring.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos
Chris Barcellos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22nd, 2009, 09:31 AM   #25
Trustee
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
that is great work. I wished u could get a Zoom H4n for the test. I am wondering if it is possible to record the zoom onboard mics via the zoom and 5D2 directly. As of now, I understand most ppl are capturing independantly and syning in post (99.9%) but I am not sure how to do this in Sony Vegas yet. So the best way would be to go directly into the 5D2 for my one man ops.
Sean Seah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22nd, 2009, 10:10 AM   #26
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
A Zoom H4n would be awesome. If anybody has one and would be willing to ship it to me for a one day test, I'd be happy to pay for overnight shipping to get it back to them. I'd love to see how it compares with the JL/ML combo, as well as JL/Microtrack II. And I'd like to know if the Zoom works well enough alone, or if an active preamp is needed to provide a clean front end.

The challenge with not having it here is calibration. It's critical that the signal levels match for the comparison to make any sense. Not to mention that the noise tests are a PITA! I left my cell phone on during one run, and I had to start over. Trucks, planes and a bit of rain delayed things as well.

BTW, I need to re-do the "beer test" now that the Magic Lantern firmware has new gain levels. I should have something to post by mid-week...
__________________
Jon Fairhurst
Jon Fairhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22nd, 2009, 05:24 PM   #27
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
Jon

PM me and we'll send you our H4N for your tests.


Brian
__________________
==========================
Brian Valente
Redrock Microsystems
Brian Valente is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22nd, 2009, 05:54 PM   #28
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Valente View Post
PM me and we'll send you our H4N for your tests.
Fantastic! PM sent!
__________________
Jon Fairhurst
Jon Fairhurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2009, 04:36 PM   #29
Tourist
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 1
So what do i need to get?

So i checked out your video Jon, clearly the juicedlink is the best, i've not yet ordered the mark II just doing research. If I want the kind of setup you spoke of in your video where can i find everything i need?

thanks.
Kamau Bilal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2009, 04:44 PM   #30
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
Kamau I suggest waiting until you see jon's latest results with H4N and his latest round of tests.


Brian
__________________
==========================
Brian Valente
Redrock Microsystems
Brian Valente is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon EOS Full Frame for HD


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network