|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 5th, 2008, 09:21 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Noosa Queensland Australia
Posts: 248
|
A1 Still Shots
I've noticed that the still shots I take with my A1 behave differently than those stills I take with my Nikon D50 and other digital still camera pix.
I use some of these stills for the web and resize them from 1920 (or 2500 from the Nikon) down to 700 pixels wide after cropping. The pix from the Nikon or any other digital camera nearly always have to be sharpened in Photo Shop after downsizing but the pix from the A1 look fine. Anyone else noticed this? |
|
|
|
July 6th, 2008, 09:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East TN
Posts: 415
|
I can't recall ever taking a still shot on my A1.
|
|
|
|
|
July 6th, 2008, 11:32 AM
|
#3 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I have a Canon D20 for still photography. I never have to sharpen anything when downsizing. Are you shooting at your maxim resolution with the Nikon? What format are you saving the downsized images to?
|
|
|
|
|
July 6th, 2008, 03:43 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Noosa Queensland Australia
Posts: 248
|
I've been resizing pix for the web for the last decade now.
I get my digital pix from my own cameras (a Nikon and a Pentax) and a number of other sources and when downsized as JPEG's for the web they nearly always need edge sharpening. I'm just intrigued that the A1 shots rarely need much, if any. |
|
|
|
|
July 6th, 2008, 03:57 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
Actually it is the contrast of 3 chips rather than one single chip.
Quote:
__________________
Lou Bruno |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
