From 1 to 2 at DVinfo.net

Dave Coyne · March 9th, 2006, 08:13 PM

Having had the XL1 for 5 years I'm wondering if the XL2 is much more, shall we say, complicated. I got alot out of "1" but I'm not technically inclined so I'd rather not end up in over my head. I know there are simpler cameras for us simpler minds but the XL series has always appealed to me.

Cheers,
-dave

Andrew Khalil · March 9th, 2006, 08:26 PM

The XL2 isn't much more complicated than the XL1. It has so many new and useful features, so if you're thinking about it, go for it. When I first used the XL2 after being an XL1 user, I figured it out very quickly and I loved having all those new things to play with like different frame rates, XLR inputs, a display the displays 16:9 properly and more zoom range.

March 9th, 2006, 08:13 PM	#1
Dave Coyne Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Rockville Maryland Posts: 30	From 1 to 2 Having had the XL1 for 5 years I'm wondering if the XL2 is much more, shall we say, complicated. I got alot out of "1" but I'm not technically inclined so I'd rather not end up in over my head. I know there are simpler cameras for us simpler minds but the XL series has always appealed to me. Cheers, -dave

March 9th, 2006, 08:26 PM	#2
Andrew Khalil Major Player Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 424	The XL2 isn't much more complicated than the XL1. It has so many new and useful features, so if you're thinking about it, go for it. When I first used the XL2 after being an XL1 user, I figured it out very quickly and I loved having all those new things to play with like different frame rates, XLR inputs, a display the displays 16:9 properly and more zoom range.