ND filters built in to the camera body similar to the JVC, this will allow better exposure control with EF lenses & also no need to carry ND filters

My wishlist would consist of -

- Inbuilt CF writers x 2
- AVCIntra @ 25 or 50mbps
- Realtime HDV recording to tape (ie have 2 encoders within the cam, AVC for CF or HDV for tape recording at the same time for backup)
- Camera supplied with a Canon EF adapter
- More lens options for native HD Video acquisition (ie choice of zooms or primes, inbuilt stabilisers, auto functions etc etc)
- CCD stabiliser, as opposed to a stabiliser in the lens. This is seen in the Sony Alpha DSLRs, but obviously it wont be as effective as a lens OIS, but at least we can stabilse shots irresepective of the lens we choose
- For the A1/G1, a larger or "twin" LCD panel. Basically 2 panels set up much like a Nintendo DS. The top panel has our camera and shot settings, the lower panel has an uncluttered view of our shot. The top panel only has to be 320x240, as its only basic text data, so res isnt an issue. The res however can be squeezed into the second panel ;)
- Simultaneous XLR and internal mic recording
- XLR to inbuilt mic switching without going into a menu (How about a custom button for this?)
- Twin DigicII or DigicIII processors (as seen on their DSLRs)
- DSLR I-AF focus settings via joystick near the record on/off button. Much like the Canon DSLRs where you can select a focus point by shifting the joystick, give us this same option for video with a grid overlay of teh focal point selected.
Better yet, offer a touch screen LCD panel which can be allocated to a focus command ;)
As an example, allow us to "swipe" our finger across the screen to create a rack focus effect
- For the A1/G1 remove the standby slider from the record button.
- For A1/G1, remove the big mode wheel and replace it with instant access buttons.
As it stands, the wheel is a waste precious real estate. I'd rather have had a dial like the DSLR dials where the LCD locks into place atop the camera under the handle. A dial here or a sliding switch would have been perfect.
Then where the mode wheel lives now, have a side flipping LCD panel at 3+ inches. This would make the camera behave like a DVX, but hey, if it works...
This initial LCD lock down and mode wheel was a bad design IMO as to access WB and Mic attenuator, you MUST move the LCD panel from its home.
These buttons could have been accessed from the side of the camera without the need to molest the position of the LCD.
Less movement, means less shake during filming.
- For A1 a larger more accurate EVF with proper sunshade eyecup, which is calibrated to mirror the LCD panel. This way the image on the EVF is identical to the LCD without the need to tweak.
As it stands, its virtually impossible to have your EVF identical to the LCD
- Zebras running alongside peaking
- Peaking colour options which track the focal distance, as found in the JVC and Sony EX units. ie focal point is tracked by a different colour
- Exposure by numbers OR by light meter. give us this option
- Exposure by centred, left or right weighted average (as found in the DSLRs) This will ensure that hotspots are recognised irrespective of the position and included wthin the exposure reading, as opposed to only using a centre point which isn't always accurate with tight frames.
- LCD set to "what you see is what you get"
- An inbuilt painkiller dispenser ;)

Good point! It would be great for those of us using EF lenses.

I'm not sure if this is true. Wouldn't recording and editing 4K RAW or 4:4:4 require significant upgrades to NLE software and hardware in many cases?

I'd LOVE to have a RED, but I don't know how the heck I could actually use 4K. Perhaps it's not as difficult as I'm making it out to be, but I think it is.

I've been such a fan of Canon...but have to admit they are losing me soon as a customer. We have the H1, A1 & HV10.

The main reason I'm leaving the line is that I feel they are truly stuck in the prosumer realm and have not made an effort to move into the "Pro" world. That's fine, but I guess I have to move on.

For example, it's inexplicable to me that they came out with a nearly $10,000 camera with 24F with no compatible deck. I thought it was around the corner...surely the best solution is NOT to buy an HV10, like we did. A couple years later and that's still the best solution. Hardly pro.

The other one, as other have said, is the LCD. It's just crazy that you miss about 5% of your picture. Very non-pro, in my opinion to not have underscan that will show you the boom mic in your frame.

Another gripe is that they gave embedded audio in the little brother G1, right after I paid MORE for the H1. They really should have done something for existing customers for this, I think, or waited on shipping the H1 until it had embedded audio.

Sorry for the rant...we still use our H1 and LOVE the picture. But these things have really pushed me away. We have a RED on order (#2100ish), but for longer form event stuff, I may make the move to the new SONY HDV cameras. Can't wait for NAB this year.

I completely agree with Kevin,

I'm a owner of 2 XL-1s's. While I love them, I realize its time to get on the HD train after seeing the amazing image from a client's XH-A1.

I'm honestly thinking of walking away from canon for the same reasons - no dedicated deck, no embedded audio in HD-SDI, crummy viewfinder.

For me to consider an XL-H2, all of those above issues would need to be resolved in addition I'd like to see either a truly manual HD lens offered, and a softer native image generated by this camera - something ala DVX-like

Hope you're listening canon otherwise i'm going to be the proud owner of JVC's 250 series soon.
~Mike

I still think the image quality of the XL-H1 is truly amazing. However, there are so many things that annoy me. Crappy viewfinder, low resolution LCD in viewfinder, peaking does not work very well, no dedicated deck, front-heavy so very hard to balance on your shoulder (JVC has done this much better).

I am thinking of trading in my XL-H1 for a Sony PMW-EX1. It solves many of the problems I experience with my XL-H1 and the image quality seems to be equal or maybe even better. What I like is the ability to do over/undercranking in camera, the ability to timelapse with the frame interval mode (which all HDV cameras lack because of codec issues), a frame record mode for animation and of course NTSC/PAL switchable straight out of the box. Finally, from what I heard, the lens controls are much better.

Most things can be achieved with the XL-H1 as well but that requires big investments and a lot of time.

And I do think it is about time that canon updates or follows up the XL-H1. Technology goes fast and they have some catching up to do.

I agree with you guys. I love my H1 for what it can do, but . . .

-The viewfinder is much too low res for "a professional" and doesn't show the full image.
Forget the FU1000. It's too clunky, power sucking and B&W only.

-The 1/3" CCD are interlaced and I hate interlaced video.

-24F although cool, has many issues that hobble it.

-35mm Canon lens are only just sharp enough when all settings (IRIS by use of ND filters is 5.6) and FOCUS are perfect.

-No embedded audio or time-code in HDSDI stream.

-Price is now higher than EX1.

- NO true over-crank.

We are about to purchase between 4-6 cameras for the video studio and with the arrival of the EX1, I cannot recommend the H1; it is just that simple.

I hope Joe B. and the folks at Canon are about to do something at NAB they haven't ever done before, debut the new H2 with many of the features described by those in this thread. The biggest being 35mm CMOS with ultra high resolution, 1080P HDSDI, great low light handling, high res. LCD, and over crank for $9K.

Yes, this is a TALL ORDER, but that is what Canon must do for the H2 if they want to stay competitive.

Well...I am a big fan of the H1...like many of you are...I have to tell you...I agree. Canon has alot of catching up to do...but I truly don't think this will happen.

There will be no H2 at NAB. Canon has not put R&D into advancing the line...
if there would be a follow up to the H1....some info would have leaked by now...even something.

In my opinion..the only thing that can keep our trusty H1's alive is the Convergence Connect Flash XDR....that they'll be unveiling at NAB. Recording to CF drives...at 100 megabit rates.

So...even though it's FUN to think about what COULD be...I have a sinking feeling there is not a follow up....at least this year.

Looks like I'm looking at an EX for portability...and a XDCam for full size productions....but then again this can all change by NAB !!! :)

Kevin,

That Convergent Design Flash XDR device looks pretty neat. Although it will only solve one shortcoming: tape to uncompressed. Will it give you 1080i uncompressed or is the HD-SDI out 1080p on this camera?

The Convergent Designs recorder is a portable HDSDI flash memory based recorder that compresses the uncompressed HDSDI signal to MPEG2, but at a higher bit rate than HDV's 25mbps.

It will not make up for the short comings of the H1, which only outputs 1080i.

Realistically if you are happy with everything else about the camera's image except the HDV format then the convergent design box will be great for you. However I think it is a little too late as the H1 is getting a little long in the tooth to invest $5k into plus cards. If the price was right I'd definitely look into this but it is priced outside of my comfort zone at this point.

I have almost made my mind up. I think I will go down the Sony EX-1 route. I really like the concept of that camera, I read nothing but praise about the image quality, and it certainly is very popular amongst the community.

What I read/hear/like:

- Over/undercranking
- Frame interval mode (not possible with HDV)
- Frame record mode
- 1080p/720p native progressive chip
- High resolution LCD (which allows proper focussing)
- Color peaking mode (which I hear works flawlessly)
- Tapeless workflow (a bit scary but I think it is the future)
- The lens design with true stops
- I also hear the lens has very pleasant focus/iris/zoom rings
- Smaller so easier to take out on the streets, easier to film in crowded environments without being noticed so easily (XL-H1 on your shoulders look like you cary Darth Vader's head)

What won't change/improve

- The PMW-EX1 is a fat lady and difficult to handhold, but I think the same goes for the XL-H1 which does not balance as a i.e. XD Cam or HPX
- I think Canon is better in ergonomics than Sony (buttons at the right places, easy to distinguish from each other)
- I do like the image quality of the Canon's a lot, so I don't think it will differ that much.
- I think the XL-H1 definitely looks more professional

So I think Canon is needs to change many things and I think they won't untill somewhere in 2009. I also think that Sony and Panasonic have better cards because they also have professional camera divisions. Canon of course has its photography business, but that is more different. Trading in my XL for the EX1 costs me $600 and gives me a fresh 2 year warranty.

I have to think about it a little bit more but I think it is a right thing to do. I really enjoyed the camera but the market is changing fast and if Canon does not react fast they are loosing customers. The A1/G1 were very nice but they should have been tapeless already as the HVX-200 was already here. That is what I like about Sony, they are very fast to the market and they are known for their high quality gear. Like Canon, but they are slow. Which is weird, because they are mostly ahead of Nikon with releasing state of the art DSLR cameras. I guess it just has to do with core business and professional video is no core business of Canon, only with regards to lens objectives.

Floris,

You're on the mark...as is everyone in this discussion. But...I think everyone has to admit...this camera is 4 years old...(or more including r&d) and at the time...it was awesome ! And still is...if you can put up with it's quirks.

We all know technology moves on...and the new brand of HD is here and the Sony EX is touting that.

We may or may not get rid of our H1 (the FlashXDR could help us keep it for some time) but for the price, the EX is amazing...with the latest technology.

My god...I used to worry about spending 50k on a camera...and keeping it for 10 years. Now...cameras under 10k are AMAZING...and if you get 2 years out of them...well that's great ! Because in 2 years...you'll be hearing similar suggestions and complaints about the EX as we are now having with the H1.

It shows how quickly our needs and wants are driving this technological bus that we all ride. Really...it's quite amazing.

Where can you trade an XL-h1 for a EX1 for $600? Not a bad deal if you can live with the shortcomings of CMOS sensor and short record times. Unless that deal comes with a couple of 16gb cards you will need to invest more. Also, don't forget that some software is not yet compatible with the EX files. I edit using Adobe Production Suite CS3 and would have to invest in Prospect HD to really take advantage of the 1920x1080.

These are all things that I have taken into consideration towards the EX1 and have kinda held me back from it. Also, although the H1 is not a "perfect" shoulder mount camera from an ergonomic point of view, it is still much better than the EX1 or HVX200 that you have to hold out in front of you.
In my line of work, I have to take that into consideration. Plus I own a couple of different lenses that I use a lot.

Good Luck.

Actually the H1 shipped in Dec of '06 (approximately...I was waiting on my HVX at the time and I remember the H1 came out first) so it is around 2years and 3 months old. Your point is made but technically the previous model XL2 isn't even 4 years old yet. (shipped Sept of 04).

I agree that the EX1 is an improvement over the H1 in general, but just the fact that it still records in an mpg variant keeps it from being so groundbreaking to me. If it was in a 4:2:2 non GOP format, things would be different. Also, I am not completely sold on CMOS sensors on these entry level pro cameras. There are some shots that just look weird. I admit the 1/2 inch sensor is appealing....but from footage I have seen the more shallow DOF really doesn't present itself that much other than on extreme tele shots. Most footage I have seen that is mid to wide doesn't look much different than the H1 to me...from a DOF point of view.


Now keep in mind, I want to like the EX1 and I want it to be the holy grail, but it just has too many little quirks and not enough extra "oomph" over the H1 image to convince me to go through all the hassles of selling my H1 setup and trying to afford the EX1/Cards/New laptop and possible new software....not to mention cases and batteries and such. If it was like the HVX200 (with more res) and had 4:2:2 color and i frame compression....I might be willing to go for it. The fact that everyone is saying it is a monster to handhold doesn't help either.

And to be clear, the majority of this is not a slam on the EX1, but more of a testament to how good the H1 is, especially for a four year old camera!

( I kid.....I kid...... :)

I'm thinking Canon might try to do something with the AVCHD recording format, like boosting the data rate toward the 24 Mbps limit and building a camera around that using CF or SD memory cards. Borrow the latest 1/3" CMOS sensors from the Sony Z7U and redesign the XL to be a proper shoulder-mounted camera...any takers? :-)

Wouldn't normally be so pedantic, but hey, seeing as you're correcting someone, I'll double correct: the H1 was announced in September 2005 and shipped in November 2005. I saw a production unit in my local dealership that month :-)

You are correct. I had the age right but the wrong originating date. It was late 05. I had the preorder in for the HVX200 and was waiting when Canon jumped in, announced the H1 in September and then delivered the goods in November. My memory was of early reports in December so I stand corrected.

My point primarily was that the H1 is not "4 years old" + more with R&D.

Marty, you are right, the camera is about 2,5 years old now.

From what I have seen the 4:2:0 XDCAM footage (35mbps) of the Sony PMW-EX1 does not look very bad compared to 4:2:2 uncompressed. The camera has a HD-SDI out (with embedded audio) so if you are chroma-keying you can hook it up to a laptop with a special break-out box and you are ready. The same can be done with the Canon XL-H1 of course. Someone here used the XL-H1 for chroma work while recording to HDV tape (For Muppets website). So I do not thing this is a big issue. If you compare the HQ and SP 4:2:0 footage you will see that the colors look much better in the HQ footage shot with the PMW-EX1. So I do not agree, Sony has made big improvements to the HD/HDV quality of their new camera compared to older models.

I also agree with Kevin that the XL-H1 is a mighty fine camera. If I had $10.000 to invest I would keep it, fix the flaws and be happy. But I haven't. The things I would really need are the 6X WIDE, Firestore and a good focusing monitor. This would cost me at least $5.000. The update/trade-in path to the EX-1 costs me $600 and I am there. 31mm compared to 38mm on the wide-angle side, tapeless workflow and a proper LCD for focusssing.

I think what is really pulling me towards Sony is the following: the world is slowly moving from SD to HD, and from tape to tapeless. I do not think it is smart to invest a lot of money now in the old system when the new system is completely different. If Canon goes to 1/2", you have a problem with the 6XWIDE and also witht he 20X standard lens. If Canon goes tapeless, you have a Firestore or Convergent Design flash recorder catching dust. A good HD monitor is worth the money I think but if I don't need it, it would be great because all of this makes you less mobile and adds more weight.

I believe that Canon will come with a XL-H2 somewhere in 2009. Maybe announce it at IBC this year. I hope it improves on everything, better LCD, tapeless, maybe even 35mm sensor from their digital camera line. Definitely true progressive sensors and maybe even better ergonomics. I could decide to wait for that but the trade-in price for my XL-H1 would drop seriously when a successor is announced. And if Canon does not deliver all of this I have waited a long time and my camera would drop in value.

It is a though decision because I really like the camera but I also think it is the last with tape and 1/3" chips. But for me, the EX1 at this moment is the most exciting camera like the XL-H1 was two years ago. I was not impressed by any camera that was released after the XL-H1 untill the EX1 came along. The HVX-200 had a lot of the features but had too many shortcomings like SD chips and also a crappy LCD. So I chose the XL-H1. Have not regretted it.

And about the SxS cards... the Sandisk 16GB cards are 600 EURO. Which gives me 2 hours of HQ recording time and almost 3 hours of SP recording time which is plenty for 98% of all things I shoot. I will also buy a Macbook Pro 15" with a Western Digital passport USB 2.0 harddisk. This allows me to capture whatever I want, let me edit it on the fly and saves on tapes. All of this is cheaper then updating the XL-H1 to suit my wishes and needs.

But hey, I hope Canon will suprise me so in a year or two - three I will be buying a new Canon which blows away the competition. I am brand loyal to a certain degree but I think Canon, Sony and Panasonic are all AAA brands.

I also hope that the next camera I buy will be in the XDCAM or HPX league or maybe even a RED which means I have progressed and was able to make a profitable business in the motion picture industry.

But thanks for your feedback/responses.

Floris,
Based on the fact that you feel you have to spend a bunch of money to get the H1 to where you need it, I understand your decision. Initially, it sounded as if a straight up trade +600 got you into the EX1. However there is significant more invesment beyond that as you know, and since you were planning to spend more cash to upgrade accessories for your H1 anyway....it's not a big deal to you.

However I already have the 6x wide angle lens, the 16x manual lens and a few lens add-ons so I am more set. Still...I do agree that the 35mbs is better than HDV (for the shots I've seen it is not tremendously better than Canon 24f HDV) but it is still a far cry from 4:2:2 Intraframe compression. SO it is a step forward but a minor step to me.

The other benefits are there too with the variable framerates and the obviously superior LCD. If it is an easy transition for you then that is great. For me personally I'd have to jump through a lot of hoops to get into the EX1 comfortably...so it really doesn't seem worth it at this point.

Please.....if you can....test drive the EX1 first. I know it looks like it is the end-all-be-all camera but you need to make sure it feels good in your hands and that you can really shoot with it comfortably. I have sold cameras and bought the "next great thing" only to find I hate the actual act of using it. I think Chris Hurd often states that we should "pick the camera that feels right to you". I can't stress that enough.

Good Luck.

Marty

Marty, thanks for your advice.

I will test the EX1 before I buy it. But I think I have a pretty good idea about how it will perform/handle from what I have read on the internet and forums. There is also http://www.vimeo.com/ex1 where you can see footage shot with this camera and it is absolutely amazing. The camera is far from perfect. I doubt that there will ever be a perfect camera. Maybe when you have like $100,000 to spend. But then still, those camera's also have flaws.

I really like the XL-H1 but I am not happy with the handling. If I shoot for like 5 - 10 minutes from my shoulders they really hurt. A proper shoulder mounted camera is heavy but can be hold for periods of up to an hour easily. And the shoulder mounted style was why I decided to buy a XL-H1 in the first place. It simply does not deliver in that regard so I wish I would have bought the XH-A1 which delivers the same image quality in a more portable package. But now the EX1 is here I think it is the best choice for me untill a proper shoulder mounted camera comes along or untill I have enough money to buy the RED camera with all accessoires. I also do not feel that Canon does enough to support the XL-H1. They released the 6X WIDE but apart from that they did nothing. No firmware improvements, nothing. And there still is no manual HD lens which I would definitely have bought.

I still hope Canon will strike back with a XL-H2. Progressive chips, 1/2", great ergonomics, tape and tapeless or only tapeless. And of course a true manual lens with lens markings and true stops. The best thing Canon could do in my eyes is to use a 35mm photo sensor from the 5D or 1D so you can use Canon 35mm lenses. Those are affordable, of high quality and widely available and they could easily solve the 1080p or even 4K footage.

Marty,

How are you using your XL-H1? Do you use shoulder support? Are you using a matte box? Are you using an Anton Bauer/IDX battery system? And do you focus with the viewfinder or do you have the B&W or external monitor?

I really want the XL-H1 to work for me but at this moment it does not.

I tried out the PMW-EX1 and I must say that I did not like it. The handling is very bad and it is hard to handhold the camera. It works when you turn the handle like 45 degrees but then still there is heavy drag on your pulse. The camera is also entirely out of plastic and there is a big ventilation cap right through the middle of the camera. The LCD screen is gorgeous though, the first proper LCD screen I have seen on any sub $10,000 HD camera. The lens also feels OK but I must say I expected more. I like the feel and handling of the XL-H1 a lot better. I guess I will go the investment route and add new gear around my XL-H1 like a good focus monitor and matte box with follow focus. The image quality of the EX1 is superb but I think it can be better.

I think I am just going to wait for a while and see how this tapeless war rages. Canon must come with an answer, then there is the RED Scarlett which can be awesome and I think Panasonic still has to come with a true HVX-200 follow up. As the XL-H1 does the job for me at this moment, I think I am in a good position to wait and see how the world changes.

I do want to know how everyone is using their XL-H1 camera though. Like with or without shoulder support, mattebox, external monitor. I like the new Nebtek 7" HD-SDI monitor. I might get that one.

Floris,
I was out of town yesterday and I just got your message. I am using the XL-H1 pretty much stock, as is and working around it's shortcomings. As I stated before, I don't mind the form factor too much and find the shoulder mount that is on it decent. Does it balance as well as a true ENG cameras? No.... but I find that if I push the viewfinder forward all the way and slide it out all the way it is pretty decent. Even if it doesn't compete with the ENG types, it still gets me a much more stable shot than with a a handycam style (DVX, HVX, FX1, Z1 and the EX1 would be this style). My arms will get tired, but to me, not as bad as when I handhold a lighter handycam style camera. I do not like the 3rd party stabilizers for those units much either as they get in the way of creative angles and manuevering.

I find myself using the H1 viewfinder in its more traditional role lately, pressed up against my eye. This adds another layer of stability. When I do pull it away and flip open the diopter I tend to find resting the back of the camera on my right collar-bone moderately comfortable. This also moves the LCD just far enough away from my eyes that I can focus.

Regarding the LCD itself. It is lame. I have learned to live with it to a degree. First of all I do a little dance with my fingers while using it where I am constantly turning the peaking on and off so I can also see zebra patterns to check exposure. I have pretty good luck with this method, especially when shooting in a controlled environment where the light changes very little. I have found recently that having my eye up to the viewfinder decreases my chances of being slightly out of focus on some shots. I am still slightly out of focus sometimes but not often. If it were a critical narrative I would definitely use an external monitor. Of course I don't own a decent portable LCD so I use a 24" LCD that is designed for a PC but has component inputs and a true 1920x1080 resolution. This is only used on "indoor" scripted events.... I do a lot of run and gun and I have to rely on the EVF for that.

I have considered the FU-1000 on several occasions but I have been hesistant as it is only black and white and technically the CRT is very small. If I could find someone who has one to test I would...in the meantime I have been holding back.

Anyway, since you have now tried the EX1 can you give us some other input?
I sold my H1 over a year ago and bought a XH-A1 thinking it was going to be just as good. Turns out, I didn't like the form factor and many of the features that I love on the XL-H1 were missing or buried in menus. A simple one is I frequently switch back and forth from on-board mic and wired mic in the back. On the H1, I just flip a switch back and forth and it works. The A1 I had to go into the menu and chosse this option. What made it worse is the menu is not available when you are recording so I had to stop recording, dig through the menu, make changes and then exit, and start recording again. I also like the gain and whitebalance controls being easily accessible....all of them...not just 1-2 presets.

Indeed this is not the end of the world but it seriously hampers my workflow. I returned the A1 and purchased another XL-H1. I lost money on that deal but I learned a hard lesson.

Now having said that, the A1 and the EX1 are obviously much different beasts. I have been drooling over the EX1 myself but I have held back based on lessons learned. The EX1 looks great, but other than the over-undercrank features, there is nothing it offers me over the H1 at this point. I am talking about in final "artisitic" capabilites. I am completely happy with the image quality of the H1 and going tapeless is not going to make my final product look better. No one watching cares if I shot it on tape or to solid state media.

Let me know what you think about all this and any further thoughts on the EX1. I am a manual lens freak so that is an attractive feature of the EX1. I do have the 16x manual for the H1 and use it 50% of the time so I already get my fix there.

Peace.

Marthy, thanks for your lengthy reply.

I think the Sony PMW-EX1 is pretty much like the Z1 only slightly bigger (they call it the fat lady). The handgrip can be rotated which you need to do to hold it handhold otherwise it is nearly impossible (with grip in normal position). The image quality is very good and the LCD is a beat (its like watching at a computer monitor or television screen and the peaking/expanded focus works great). But like with the A1, a lot of settings must be set in the menus and the camera needs to reboot continuously (like when you switch from i to F1 or F2 on the XL-H1, only it takes even longer on the EX1). The EX1 lens has some nice touches but it is small and does absolutely in no way feel like a professional lens. I like the feel and look of the 20X HD lens even better. If the 20X HD would have real stops, good markings and an iris ring, it would be perfect for me. I also did not like the ergonomics of the new Sony camera. Buttons are placed at odd locations and it is hard to tell them apart. The XL-H1 truly shines in this area (and is also much better then the XH-A1 and XH-G1). All these little things gave me a bad feeling about switching. The image quality is really superb and the overcranking/undercranking/frame interval modes are really nice but I attach a lot of importance to the handling of a camera. And I really think the XL-H1 successor or a new JVC will also have those features. Also, I don't think it will take long before we will see 1080p50/1080p60 on cameras in this priceclass. The EX1 will still force you to shoot either 1080p and 720p for over/undercranked footage and mix it in the timeline or alternatively shoot everything in 720p. They are close, but still not perfect.

I am very vulnerable to new impulses like you (if I read what you say correctly) and I am very happy with your remark about thinking it over and trying it out. The EX1 will fix a lot of the issues I am having with my XL-H1. But on the other hand, it will add some new issues. At the end the XL-H1 allows me to shoot great footage, as will the EX1. But when you are the owner of a XL-H1, you don't really need to switch right now. I have decided to just wait and see how the tapeless market evolves. I hope that Canon will jump into it with just compact flash cards and something in me hopes Canon will introduce a camera with a 35mm Canon mount.

I also agree with you that Sony has improved the codec, but it is still 4:2:0 while 4:2:2 should be possible and will be introduced in the near future on cameras in this price category. I also thought about wether Canon would go 1/2" or stay with 1/3" and I think they will do the latter. Sony just introduced two new 1/3" cameras with interchangeable lenses so I guess Canon must be doing something good in that market.

I am also interested in RED. They are going to unveil the Scarlett at NAB and I want to see what it is and what it will do. I think you are right that one needs to work around the limitations instead of looking for the perfect camera, because honestly, that camera does not exist. The big cinema style cameras might have all the features, it comes at the cost of portability and run and gun style is hardly possible with those cameras. The bigger the camera, the more attention, the less interviews will feel comfortable... so I guess I just need to be happy with the camera I have for now.

I am just going to watch the gladiators in the HD camera market and see how the market develops with regards to tapes, colorspace and features. I think with the HVX-200 and PMW-EX1 out there, JVC and Canon will also need to look at tapeless and over/undercranking in camera. Sony and Panasonic are always first and Canon and JVC follow. Red is a new contender but is still in its infancy shoes (look at the delivery time and backlog for their RED camera). I have invested in the XL system (and you obviously too) and I think I will wait to see what Canon's answer will be. I hope they will deliver and if they don't, I have a good reason to switch.

Another option might be the XD Cam route as the footage of that camera is accepted for 100% acquisition on Discovery Channel. But it are all specifications. I saw the making off of "The Deadliest Catch" (Discovery show about crabfishing) and they were using Sony Z1 cameras for everything, the whole series is shot with 50 of those cameras with a few shots from a helicopter and another boat that are shot with other cameras.

Let's wait and see what happens at NAB and IBC this year.

Floris said "I am very vulnerable to new impulses like you (if I read what you say correctly)"

You nailed it! I have been a sucker for every new thing that comes down the pike, and this often results in me finding all the bugs and problems with the new cameras. I owned the DVX100 and received on of the very first units. While it was a great camera, there was very little support for 24P initially and I spent a lot of time being very frustrated.

In one stretch I actually owned 4 different cameras in the span of a year.....none at the same time...I would sell one and buy another over and over. Here is the deal.

XL2. Sold because I felt the low light performance was weak compared to DVX100 I used to have.

HVX200. Bought this to replace my XL2 because Pana had a great product in the DVX and they were touting the great performance in low lighting and latitude based on their pixel shift technology. Turned out to be worse that the XL2 in low light. P2 workflow was too pricey to keep.

Bought XL-H1 to replace HVX200. I was given a loaner to try for 2 weeks while I stillhad my HVX and found the XL-h1 was blowing it away. I had felt the HVX200 looked like enhanced definition and didn't look like broadcast HD I was seeing. The H1 blew my mind and looked like Discovery HD Theatre material. So I sold the HVX and bought the H1 at an additional expense of course....but it seemed worth it.

XH-A1.....3 months after buying the H1 the A1 was announced and seemed to be everything the H1 was and more but at almost half the cost. Needless to say I sold my H1 and bought the A1.....only to be disappointed. I returned it and bought the H1 back again.

This was in a 13 month period. Pretty impulsive huh? The good news is in June I will have been using the H1 for 2 years, minus one month where I had sold it and had the A1 instead.

I am trying to be patient and get the most out of what I have.

I will be using the XL-H1 for two years in November 2008. I am going to try to stick with it for another year and a half. The problem is that with a new camera, you need a lot of time to get used to it and to be able to handle it as fast/good as your old camera. I have read an article (which was about photography, but that market works the same) that the best professionals stick with their gear for longer periods of time. That means you have to buy high quality gear that can last for longer periods. But I think they are right. Unless the market demands something and you can't get away with your old gear anymore, every reason for upgrading is a luxury one. I think you can still get away with SD and that 80% of the footage is still delivered in SD quality. Sites like Vimeo offer HD 720p quality but because of the codec (which is very good but still) it does not differ too much at the end from SD.

Manufacturers are really good in making you believe that you need the latest technology but more often than not this is absolutely not true.

I think at the end is is better to invest in expensive gear like 2/3" lenses which keep their value and can be used on each new generation of cameras and is universal regardless of brand. That's another thing that kept me from the Sony, I have Canon batteries, a Canon quick-mount tripod adapter and all those things and when you switch brand you can start over again.

I just wished Canon was a little bit more supportive for their XL system. An upgraded viewfinder for like $1.000/$1.500 could have been easily released and would have helped many users. The same goes for a manual HD lens. Those little things can make a big difference.

not sure if it's been listed in this thread...but would it be so hard to add in a hours meter for the camera?