|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 6th, 2010, 12:06 PM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 2
|
The difference between Prores and Cineform Neoscene
Hello,
I've been a CS4 Premiere user since I'm windows based. I'm a Neoscene fan and I love how it works for windows. I'm about to convert to MAC environment using a combination of Final Cut and CS5 (after effects). Should I still invest into Neoscene or use Prores? What's the difference and what are the advantages and disadvantages for one another? I've been searching the web but I haven't found a concrete answer to it yet. Seems like everyone who are MAC are sticking to Prores that comes with Final Cut already. Any info would be appreciated. Khoa |
August 6th, 2010, 12:29 PM | #2 |
CTO, CineForm Inc.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cardiff-by-the-Sea, California
Posts: 8,095
|
Yes the the PC it is easy choice, on the Mac if you have FCS, you do already have a nice codec (if you don't have FCS then choise is easy again.) On a Mac you would choose to add NeoScene for reasons beyond having a nice/fast immediate codec. Some of the reasons would be :
* for projects use PC and Mac tools -- and you can use a common codec with CineForm. * You camera source have 3-2 pulldown. Many HDV and AVCHD camera benefit from Neo proccessing to get a true 24p file. * You are working with HD-DSLRs, NeoScene processing help preserve dynamic range when stored in a codec CineForm. If you upgrade to NeoHD, then FirstLight advantages kick in.
__________________
David Newman -- web: www.gopro.com blog: cineform.blogspot.com -- twitter: twitter.com/David_Newman |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|