error messages - Page 2 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > External Video Recording Solutions > Convergent Design Odyssey
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Convergent Design Odyssey
...and other Convergent Design products.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 25th, 2010, 02:12 PM   #16
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

Yes, we will try to test for all of these conditions.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 09:51 AM   #17
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dear Dan,

I'm worried, because - even with the latest official firmware - I'm still having those intermittent hangs, when - after I finish recording a clip - the unit just displays the "Stopping..." message for ever. The Status lamp remains red; that of the slot in use is off.

Did you have any other user reporting similar behaviour?

I'm concerned because if this is a hardware failure, the procedure required to send the unit from the EU to the US and back is very cumbersome and expensive.

How can we establish what the culprit is, possibly without sending my nanoFlash over to CD?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 10:27 AM   #18
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

I checked with our engineers and support staff.

Tommy has reported that, under certain circumstances, certain settings and conditions, that this is possible with the Public Beta, but it is very rare.

Tommy mentioned that this could occur with 720p with certain user actions and/or settings. I do not know if you were working with 720p or not.

They have worked on this and feel that this is fixed.

So, my best advice is to wait for the next Public Beta.

As soon as we have an internal firmware release that we have tested for a few days, I will send it to you as a Private Beta.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 10:45 AM   #19
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Thanks Dan - the speed you are answering the posts here is incredible!

I'm a bit relieved that it does happen, which could indicate it's not a hardware issue with my nano or specific card (as this would be a big problem for me).

However, while this happened for the first time while I was testing the latest Beta, and indeed in 720p mode, today it happened again (just once) with the official firmware to which I reverted, and the 1080p format...

Before I installed the Beta a couple of days ago (which today I replaced with the official fw), it never happened even once; I filled up both cards many times without a single glitch.

One I can say for sure:

1. It can happen with both the latest Public Beta AND the latest official release; in 720p and in 1080p

2. It's NOT caused buy starting recording too quickly after power-up (as I speculated earlier)

3. It is NOT related to the card speed, as it did happen while recording just a 50Mps MXF.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 01:13 PM   #20
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dear Dan,

It just happened again - this time, there was also the message "card in slot 1 too slow", the bitrate switched from 100 down to 50 Mbps, the "Stopping..." message displayed forever, and the footage is lost of course :(

I really don't know what's going on; the cards I bought from you are the 32GB PhotoFast, and have been good for up to 220 Mbps (I-frame) or 180 Mbps (Log-GOP). They have been consistently reported as UDMA5 (with Beta firmware), and "no errors" message is displayed at boot-up (with 1.1.154 firmware)...

Does it make sense to try and install the 1.1.154 once again? Probably not, but the fact is there were absolutely no errors with it PRIOR to my tests with the Beta, and now the same error keeps happening as with the Beta!

Edit Something is definitely wrong; just gor another error message while starting the very first clip after power-up:

"SlotDpc: 0003"

- what's up?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive

Last edited by Piotr Wozniacki; February 26th, 2010 at 02:08 PM.
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 02:41 PM   #21
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 393
Piotr,

I have been skimming through your conversation with the world's best sales and marketing person, Dan Keaton. Mind you, Alex Dolgin (Dolgin Engineering) is every bit as good - sorry off topic here. In quickly reading some of your posts, I may have missed your point (sorry if I do) but I have 4 Sandisk 32Gb Extreme III cards that I have used under various conditions (very hot but not as cold as Alister has though), but more in very short recordings, lots of stop start etc.

I personally feel that the Sandisk cards are without doubt worth the (high) premium but once they are purchased, you quickly forget about the cost and can rely on them, thus far (6 months now) without fail or having the nano display recoding errors.

Perhaps some of the other recommended cards might not be as capable under real world situations like yours, I don't know, but I am very happy that I have the Sandisk cards, just like I am with the Sony SxS Pro cards. Not one card issue with either.

Do you have a Sandisk or 2 to try out? Might be worth it.
Am I on track here?

Best wishes
__________________
David Issko
Edit 1 Video Productions
David Issko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 03:05 PM   #22
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

Thank you for the additional clue.

We will be testing for "Card Too Slow".

Mike Schell and I have been discussing this and we are implementing some tools so we can see the internal condition of the nanoFlash, specifically, how much of our very large internal memory buffer is being used at any moment.

This will allow us to analyze the problem and fix it.

Piotr, have you reinstalled 1.1.154? I could not determine if you had from your recent post. I am assuming that all of what you are reporting applies to our Public Beta, except when you are speaking in historical terms.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 03:12 PM   #23
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear David,

Thank you for your comments on the SanDisk cards.

At this point in time, I think Piotr is reporting problems with our Public Beta.

I feel that we have a problem, in that sometimes, we get a "Card Too Slow" error.

We are researching this problem in our lab.

Thus, while this could be a card related issue, I would rather blame our Public Beta, "Not for Production Use", firmware at this time.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 04:08 PM   #24
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Keaton View Post
Piotr, have you reinstalled 1.1.154? I could not determine if you had from your recent post. I am assuming that all of what you are reporting applies to our Public Beta, except when you are speaking in historical terms.
Dear Dan,

Sorry if my English has caused confusion; let me reiterate:

1. Until a couple of days ago, I was using the 1.1.154 without any single errors of this type

2. During my testing the Beta, the "Stopping" hang errors appeared for the first time. I reverted to the 1.1.154 today, hoping it was the Beta that was causing them

3. Unfortunately, even though I'm back on the 1.1.154, the errors persists so I can't trust my nano for a serious tasks

4. The errors usually take place with one of the very first clips after powering the nano up (can't tell you for sure whether it's always the very first clip, but more than once it was). After I power-cycle and reformat, if the first clip saves OK, the next ones are usually OK too.

5. The error (when it occurs) usually manifests itself with the nano hanging, displaying the "Stopping...." message for ever

6. At a single occurrence, this has been accompanied by the "slot 1 card too slow, footage lost" message, and the bitrate going down from 100 to 50 Mbps

7. Also, "SlotDpc: 0003" displayed just once right after power-up.

I don't know whether the above makes sense, but that's how it is...BTW, may I know what exactly the SlotDpc: 0003 message means?

Also, is there a chance that some sort of a "hard reset" followed by another installation of the 1.1.154 firmware help?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2010, 05:12 PM   #25
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

I will ask Tommy for an explanation of the SlotDpc: 0003 error message. I do not know what this means.

There is no hard reset of the nanoFlash, other than re-installing the firmware.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2010, 07:37 AM   #26
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
To David (and all that might be interested):

- while it may look like it, my problems are not due to the cards being too slow.

I have exchanged a couple of invaluable email messages with Dan, and here is the outcome:

1. With the Public Beta, the startup period is longer than before, and this startup period must complete before one starts to record

2. In low temperatures, my nanoFlash requires a short warm-up period

Keeping the above in mind, I run a very closely monitored series of tests and observed the following:

1. I first power the nanoFlash up; it does its storage check routine and reports no errors

2. Only after several minutes I turn the camera on (while receiving the SDI signal, the nano does some more card checks again, and reports no errors).

3. I start recording, and all is OK - even with testing at 180 Mbps, long-GOP

4. The only one time I saw an error using the above procedure has been the "SlotDpc: 0003" message; it was displayed at stage 2, when - on switching the camera on - the nano received SDI signal for the first time (i.e. even before I started recording !!!). Of course, I had to power-cycle the nano, but all was fine afterwards.

Of course, such careful and lengthy startup procedure may not be practical in the field, but Dan has given me some hope it can be fixed with appropriate firmware changes, without a need of sending my nanoFlash in.

Thanks Dan!
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 08:24 AM   #27
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
After many days of fighting with my nanoFlash errors, I have found that the latest Public Beta's "crank" mode must be turned OFF before you attempt downgrading to the official, stable 1.1.154 firmware.

If the crank mode is ON, after downgrading to the official firmware there will be audio/video glitches in the clips. Even "Restoring Defaults" will not help.

Also, the nanoFlash may enter into a false condition of erroneous communicating with the card slots (at least this is what happened with mine).

After correcting this situation, my nanoFlash is working OK again, and the clips are clean. I need to test it for another couple of days to confirm this; will keep you posted.

Piotr

Edit

Dear Dan,

When I think of it, this case is an example of the need to include something like "backward compatibility" menu setting (in addition to "Restore Defaults") in each consecutive Beta release. Considering all those many great options you're going to implement, something may always go wrong in a Beta (just like the crank mode did in the latest Beta release) - so reverting everything back to the pre-Beta state before actually downgrading to the previous official release could save people a lot of headache!

What do you think?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive

Last edited by Piotr Wozniacki; March 3rd, 2010 at 09:04 AM.
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 4th, 2010, 06:54 AM   #28
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Update

So far so good - after the full week of testing, trying to eliminate faulty cards, nano slots, nanoFlash itself, the SDI connection, etc. etc. - it looks like my guts feeling was right:

The errors I was getting were software related; the nanoFlash and my CF cards are OK.

Let me remind that the problem aroused when - after testing the Public Beta - I left my nanoFlash with the "Crank" mode enabled, and downgraded to the official firmware 1.1.154.

This has caused intermittent error messages like "Footage lost...Card in slot X is too slow..Awaiting source" scrolling in the upper line of the nano display, while the nanoFlash was hanging with the "Stopping..." message displayed permanently. Also, even those clips that were saved OK, suffered from audio and video glitches, and crashed Vegas.

The cure has been:

- upgrade to the Beta again
- turn the Crank mode off
- stay with the Beta, or only now downgrade to the 1.1.154 again

Now both the Beta and the official firmware work OK (with the exception of the Crank mode, of course - but this is gonna be fixed in the nearest Beta, if I understood Dan correctly).
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > External Video Recording Solutions > Convergent Design Odyssey


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network