error messages at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > External Video Recording Solutions > Convergent Design Odyssey

Convergent Design Odyssey
...and other Convergent Design products.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 20th, 2010, 01:57 PM   #1
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
error messages

Having read the manual, I learnt the "DMA RD" error message signals error in communicating with CF cards; may I know what DMA RD003 means specifically?

This happened to me with both the Beta Version 1.5.31, and with the latest official firmware Version 1.1.154. Power-cycling the unit cleared the message.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 02:07 PM   #2
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT.
Posts: 58
Piotr,

I have had the same experience. Though I can't be sure I think it is triggered by my quick record/pause cycle time not allowing the Nanoflash to catch up. It is an inconvenience to be sure, I hope it is dealt with in a new firmware release.

Last edited by Dave Nystul; February 20th, 2010 at 04:54 PM. Reason: sp
Dave Nystul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 02:13 PM   #3
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

This error message can be caused by inserting or ejecting two cards almost simultaneously.

Yes, this error message must be cleared by powering down the nanoFlash.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 02:55 PM   #4
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dear Dan,

If I remember correctly (it happened on the very first day of my testing the nano back in December, still with the 1.1.154 firmware), the sequence was following:

- triggering mode was set to Record button
- I recorded a clip, and pressed Stop
- the message "stopping..." displayed and lasted so long, that I power-cycled the unit
- on power-up, the DMA RD003 message displayed, so I had to power-cycle again
- I reformatted the cards, and the error never returned.

Until today (with Beta Version 1.5.31 firmware), when after I tested "delete last clip function" (worked OK), the same message popped-up.

Can you figure out the possible reason, and could this information be useful in testing the Beta?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 03:36 PM   #5
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

Please let me know if I understand correctly:

1. You were using our Public Beta 1.5.31.

2. You just completed a "Delete Last Clip".

3. After the "Delete Last Clip" worked successfully, you received a DMA RD003 error.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 04:19 PM   #6
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Exactly Dan - this is what happened with the Beta 1.5.31 today (just once).

This reminded me I did have the same error message with the previous firmware 1.1.154 in quite different circumstances.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 04:58 PM   #7
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT.
Posts: 58
Dan,

is it possible the circumstances I've described could trigger this error message? Not waiting for the Nanoflash to finish writing?
Dave Nystul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 06:46 PM   #8
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Dave,

I am not certain what you mean by a quick Record/Pause cycle.

Do you mean that immediately after recording, you pressed Play, then Play again to pause the nanoFlash?
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 08:45 PM   #9
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT.
Posts: 58
Dan,

I guess I mean that as I end a shot-pressing record to pause-I immediately see something in my viewfinder I want so I quickly press record again. This might happen after only a couple of seconds. Is that what you were thinking?
Dave Nystul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20th, 2010, 09:34 PM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Dave,

Thanks for the explanation. I understand now.

We will test for that condition.

Recording, Stop, Attempting to Record Again Immediately.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21st, 2010, 09:05 AM   #11
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dear Dan,

Sorry for bombarding you with messages, but I'm doing my weekend homework of testing the new Beta firmware. Here is another problem (never happened with the previous fw):

My CF cards (PhotoFast) are reported by the nano as UDMA5-capable. In fact, I could reliably record with 180 Mbps long-GOP - but with the Beta, I just encountered another failure: with the bitrate set to just 100 Mbps, I got the message "recording lost" and the nano switched straight to 50 Mbps (by-passing the 80 Mbps option). Then the "stopping..." message appeared and stayed for ever, so I had to power-cycle. The latter occurred for the second time since installing the Beta!

So I decided to torture-test it a bit, set the bitrate to 180, and recorded several clips with quite fast stop/start sequences - without a single glitch...

Something intermittent is happening in the communication with the CF cards, obviously!

What do you think?

Piotr
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21st, 2010, 09:41 AM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

Thanks for the report.

We will test this in our lab.

Yes, the 80 Mbps option is new, and we must not have added this to our "Bit Rate Down-Shift" code.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21st, 2010, 02:56 PM   #13
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dan,

Could it be that with the newest Beta firmware, when the nanoFlash checks and reports the cards (their names, and capabilities in terms of UDMA level) - when recording is started too early after powering-up, errors like the above can occur?

Interestingly, those errors never repeat later; also after power-cycling, if I wait for the card diagnostics to complete and only then start recording, everything is OK...

I suspect that hanging with the "stopping..." message displayed and lowering the speed down to 50 Mbps only happens when one starts recording immediately after power-up. At least, this is what happened to me twice after upgrading the firmware...
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 21st, 2010, 07:03 PM   #14
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
Dear Piotr,

That is an interesting theory.

When we test the new firmware, our testers, as humans, fall into certain habits, and tend to do things one (or a few ways).

They may not have tested recording before the messages are finished.

I am in the habit of waiting for the messages to finish before starting to record. I never thought of doing it differently. (But, I am not one of our formal firmware testers.)

This is something we will test.
__________________
Dan Keaton
Augusta Georgia
Dan Keaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2010, 02:06 PM   #15
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
Dan,

Until the firmware update (with fixed overcranking) is available, I will be using the latest official version. Before I revert to it, I have another kind request that you look into possible reason for nanoFlash freezing when finished recording, and the "stopping..." message remains on the display with the card light constantly red...

It happened to me again, and this time I make sure I did not start recording too quickly after powering the nano.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive

Last edited by Piotr Wozniacki; February 25th, 2010 at 02:45 PM.
Piotr Wozniacki is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > External Video Recording Solutions > Convergent Design Odyssey

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network