|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 23rd, 2009, 10:05 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
De-interlace... not necessary?
I've always brought video into after effects to de-interlace, cause I thought the de-interlace filter in Final Cut looked pretty bad. I was just looking at HDV footage in Final Cut that I needed to export for a SD DVD. I went into the sequence settings and changed it to fields: none (from upper) and it instantly de-interlaced. I'm not sure why I never noticed this before. So is there a catch I should know about or did I just de-interlace my edit?
|
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2009, 02:04 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Huddersfield, UK
Posts: 469
|
Aric - I don't know but have also wanted to know the exact same thing! My guess is that it just plays a single field (thus reducing the resolution). In QT you can do a similar thing by selecting single field in A/V settings. I'm certain though that selecting no field dominance in FCP does not actually de-interlace the image.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
