Possibly the GS200/400/DV953 Killer??

Carlos E. Martinez · May 11th, 2004, 03:54 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : 1/4.7" = .212"
1/6" = .166"

I don't see a big difference in size.
-->>>

Not big but considerable. 28% percent more.

At least a step in the right direction, instead of going down to 1/8".

Carlos

Tom E Young · May 11th, 2004, 04:00 AM

Yes 1/4.7 is more bigger and this is good.

Justin Boyle · May 11th, 2004, 04:17 AM

thanks for that tom that was great. i big help i didn't realise till now

Justin

Patricia Kim · May 11th, 2004, 04:18 AM

Actual specs are at www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/handycam/PRODUCTS/DCR-HC1000/spec.html. 37 mm filter thread size, 780g (w/out battery, I think) which puts it in the weight range of the gs100k. No BT, Frank, so they heard you. Even comes with Mac compatible software. There's an accessories page, also, with several WA lenses and several teleconversions - and a wimpy looking mike with a white (or pale) muff that seems to be connected with the 5.1 surround sound. You can see a reference to VAIO; could be tied to use with Sony's computers.

Question: why isn't this all being discussed in the Sony forum? I saw a few remarks, but remarkably little enthusiasm.

Justin Boyle · May 11th, 2004, 04:25 AM

i find that most forums apart from this one lack enthusiasm and there is not as much info as there is on this site.

Justin

Justin Boyle · May 11th, 2004, 04:28 AM

heh i think that the 5.1 in this cam will present problems. how do they stop noises like breathing etc being picked up. For those that like to dub also this means that you wont be able to because the channels used for dubbing will be used. another thing is that the best quality recording will be 12db. That probably wont be a problem to most people because they will dub with their computers and most people probably only shoot with 12db instead of 16 or whateva it is. I speak for myself here.

Justin

Frank Granovski · May 11th, 2004, 04:43 AM

Quote:

Question: why isn't this all being discussed in the Sony forum? I saw a few remarks, but remarkably little enthusiasm.

Yes, Boyd is waiting with open arms. :-))

It's good to talk about the competition here, so we can tear them apart. Actually, comparing with the competition will makes us Pana owners stronger. This forum is a cult, after all. :-))

Patricia Kim · May 11th, 2004, 05:08 AM

I hope those aren't pods in the background. (Ooh, that was ghoulish. Sorry.)

Frank Granovski · May 11th, 2004, 05:39 AM

"Body Snatchers" (?)

Patricia Kim · May 11th, 2004, 06:17 AM

Worse. The cult members in California a few years ago who all got into their "pods" to follow their leader to the great beyond.

Tom E Young · May 11th, 2004, 06:35 AM

28 percent more is a lot in a small video camcorder. Cults are no good. They suck you in and steal your money. I wish to never belong to any cult. If this place is a cult I do not believe it. I just want good camcorder information from here and Panasonic. I think Panasonic is best. The more I come and read here the more I want one. I have to go now but I will be back tonight.

George Beck · May 11th, 2004, 06:55 AM

28% bigger, but with 24% more pixels...
so there you have it, no difference at all if it's not for the number of pixels.

Allan Rejoso · May 11th, 2004, 09:31 AM

Sony Japan rates minimum lux requirement at 11 lux. I'd bet Sony N.A. would rate it at 6 lux or lower :-))

Michael Struthers · May 11th, 2004, 09:34 AM

I'm not too impressed with the look, and am unmoved until I see 16x9, SONY!!!

Tommy Haupfear · May 11th, 2004, 10:10 AM

Quote:

I'm not too impressed with the look, and am unmoved until I see 16x9, SONY!!!

Yeah, the look leaves something to be desired but more than likely it will have the same high quaility 16:9 mode of the PDX10 since they are both 1/4.7" 3CCD with 1070k pixels each.

May 11th, 2004, 04:17 AM	#18
Justin Boyle Major Player Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 207	thanks for that tom that was great. i big help i didn't realise till now Justin __________________ jlboyle

May 11th, 2004, 04:25 AM	#20
Justin Boyle Major Player Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 207	i find that most forums apart from this one lack enthusiasm and there is not as much info as there is on this site. Justin __________________ jlboyle

May 11th, 2004, 04:28 AM	#21
Justin Boyle Major Player Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 207	heh i think that the 5.1 in this cam will present problems. how do they stop noises like breathing etc being picked up. For those that like to dub also this means that you wont be able to because the channels used for dubbing will be used. another thing is that the best quality recording will be 12db. That probably wont be a problem to most people because they will dub with their computers and most people probably only shoot with 12db instead of 16 or whateva it is. I speak for myself here. Justin __________________ jlboyle

May 11th, 2004, 09:34 AM	#29
Michael Struthers Major Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: SF, Ca Posts: 421	I'm not too impressed with the look, and am unmoved until I see 16x9, SONY!!! __________________ Michael Struthers www.buzzdigital.com

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

May 11th, 2004, 03:54 AM	#16
Carlos E. Martinez Trustee Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Posts: 1,138	<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : 1/4.7" = .212" 1/6" = .166" I don't see a big difference in size. -->>> Not big but considerable. 28% percent more. At least a step in the right direction, instead of going down to 1/8". Carlos

May 11th, 2004, 04:00 AM	#17
Tom E Young Regular Crew Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Edmonton, Canada Posts: 130	Yes 1/4.7 is more bigger and this is good.

May 11th, 2004, 04:18 AM	#19
Patricia Kim Major Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii Posts: 453	Actual specs are at www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/handycam/PRODUCTS/DCR-HC1000/spec.html. 37 mm filter thread size, 780g (w/out battery, I think) which puts it in the weight range of the gs100k. No BT, Frank, so they heard you. Even comes with Mac compatible software. There's an accessories page, also, with several WA lenses and several teleconversions - and a wimpy looking mike with a white (or pale) muff that seems to be connected with the 5.1 surround sound. You can see a reference to VAIO; could be tied to use with Sony's computers. Question: why isn't this all being discussed in the Sony forum? I saw a few remarks, but remarkably little enthusiasm.

May 11th, 2004, 05:08 AM	#23
Patricia Kim Major Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii Posts: 453	I hope those aren't pods in the background. (Ooh, that was ghoulish. Sorry.)

May 11th, 2004, 05:39 AM	#24
Frank Granovski Outer Circle Join Date: May 2002 Location: Hope, BC Posts: 7,524	"Body Snatchers" (?)

May 11th, 2004, 06:17 AM	#25
Patricia Kim Major Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii Posts: 453	Worse. The cult members in California a few years ago who all got into their "pods" to follow their leader to the great beyond.

May 11th, 2004, 06:35 AM	#26
Tom E Young Regular Crew Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Edmonton, Canada Posts: 130	28 percent more is a lot in a small video camcorder. Cults are no good. They suck you in and steal your money. I wish to never belong to any cult. If this place is a cult I do not believe it. I just want good camcorder information from here and Panasonic. I think Panasonic is best. The more I come and read here the more I want one. I have to go now but I will be back tonight.

May 11th, 2004, 06:55 AM	#27
George Beck Major Player Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 244	28% bigger, but with 24% more pixels... so there you have it, no difference at all if it's not for the number of pixels.

May 11th, 2004, 09:31 AM	#28
Allan Rejoso Major Player Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Tokyo, Japan Posts: 569	Sony Japan rates minimum lux requirement at 11 lux. I'd bet Sony N.A. would rate it at 6 lux or lower :-))