|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9th, 2005, 10:24 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St.Petersburg,Fla
Posts: 162
|
HD Quality
I'm about to sell my Sony VX2100 and I'm planing on getting the HDR-FX1 camera. My main use will be taking Video of my kids. I'm figuring they are only young once and I want to get the best video I can afford. I have been reading all up on this camera and I just what some pro's input on the quality of this camera. I appreciate any input you all can give.
Chet |
April 10th, 2005, 06:10 AM | #2 |
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
I also sold my VX2100...........unless you are using the FX-1 for HDV, there is no difference in quality under good lighting.
HOWEVER-the VX2100 is MUCH better under low light-much better!
__________________
Lou Bruno |
April 10th, 2005, 06:19 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St.Petersburg,Fla
Posts: 162
|
Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply.
Chet |
April 10th, 2005, 06:54 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>>
Unless you want to shoot 16:9... |
April 10th, 2005, 12:44 PM | #5 |
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
AGREE!! Forgot that point....it is TRUE 16:9
<<<-- Originally posted by Boyd Ostroff : <<<-- Originally posted by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>> Unless you want to shoot 16:9... -->>>
__________________
Lou Bruno |
April 10th, 2005, 12:46 PM | #6 |
Go Cycle
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 815
|
NO GRAIN in the picture at 12db....slight at 15db.....not at all like the TRV320.
<<<-- Originally posted by Chad Solo : Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply. Chet -->>>
__________________
Lou Bruno |
April 10th, 2005, 01:34 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St.Petersburg,Fla
Posts: 162
|
Thank's allot for the reply it's much appreciated.
Thank's Chet |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|