HD Quality at DVinfo.net

Chad Solo · April 9th, 2005, 10:24 PM

I'm about to sell my Sony VX2100 and I'm planing on getting the HDR-FX1 camera. My main use will be taking Video of my kids. I'm figuring they are only young once and I want to get the best video I can afford. I have been reading all up on this camera and I just what some pro's input on the quality of this camera. I appreciate any input you all can give.

Chet

Lou Bruno · April 10th, 2005, 06:10 AM

I also sold my VX2100...........unless you are using the FX-1 for HDV, there is no difference in quality under good lighting.

HOWEVER-the VX2100 is MUCH better under low light-much better!

Chad Solo · April 10th, 2005, 06:19 AM

Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply.

Chet

Boyd Ostroff · April 10th, 2005, 06:54 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>>

Unless you want to shoot 16:9...

Lou Bruno · April 10th, 2005, 12:44 PM

AGREE!! Forgot that point....it is TRUE 16:9

<<<-- Originally posted by Boyd Ostroff : <<<-- Originally posted

by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>>

Unless you want to shoot 16:9... -->>>

Lou Bruno · April 10th, 2005, 12:46 PM

NO GRAIN in the picture at 12db....slight at 15db.....not at all like the TRV320.

<<<-- Originally posted by Chad Solo : Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply.

Chet -->>>

Chad Solo · April 10th, 2005, 01:34 PM

Thank's allot for the reply it's much appreciated.

Thank's
Chet

April 9th, 2005, 10:24 PM	#1
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	HD Quality I'm about to sell my Sony VX2100 and I'm planing on getting the HDR-FX1 camera. My main use will be taking Video of my kids. I'm figuring they are only young once and I want to get the best video I can afford. I have been reading all up on this camera and I just what some pro's input on the quality of this camera. I appreciate any input you all can give. Chet

April 10th, 2005, 06:10 AM	#2
Lou Bruno Go Cycle Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Huntington, NY Posts: 815	I also sold my VX2100...........unless you are using the FX-1 for HDV, there is no difference in quality under good lighting. HOWEVER-the VX2100 is MUCH better under low light-much better! __________________ Lou Bruno

April 10th, 2005, 12:44 PM	#5
Lou Bruno Go Cycle Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Huntington, NY Posts: 815	AGREE!! Forgot that point....it is TRUE 16:9 <<<-- Originally posted by Boyd Ostroff : <<<-- Originally posted by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>> Unless you want to shoot 16:9... -->>> __________________ Lou Bruno

April 10th, 2005, 12:46 PM	#6
Lou Bruno Go Cycle Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Huntington, NY Posts: 815	NO GRAIN in the picture at 12db....slight at 15db.....not at all like the TRV320. <<<-- Originally posted by Chad Solo : Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply. Chet -->>> __________________ Lou Bruno

April 10th, 2005, 06:19 AM	#3
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	Thank's for the reply. I'm worried about the low light not so good on the FX-1. Last week I shot my son's baptism and I used 2 camera's the VX2100 and my old TRV320 and what a difference in the quality with these two camera's. The TRV320 was Grainy due to the low light but the VX2100 had no problem with this. Will the FX-1 be better then my old TRV320 but not as good as the VX2100? I will always be shooting in HDV and at this point if I want to make a DVD I will just downconvert until the new HD DVD recorders becomes available. Thank's again for the reply. Chet

April 10th, 2005, 06:54 AM	#4
Boyd Ostroff Wrangler Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mays Landing, NJ Posts: 11,787	<<<-- Originally posted by Lou Bruno : there is no difference in quality under good lighting. -->>> Unless you want to shoot 16:9...

April 10th, 2005, 01:34 PM	#7
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	Thank's allot for the reply it's much appreciated. Thank's Chet