|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 29th, 2010, 08:21 AM
|
#16 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Dan. I might consider it. I'll get back to you on that soon.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
|
|
August 4th, 2010, 08:51 PM
|
#17 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 42
|
hello,
Any updates so far? Has anyone actually tried to import-edit-deliver with the format? thanks. |
|
|
|
|
August 4th, 2010, 09:06 PM
|
#18 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 42
|
Hi,
I guess my main question is: Which gives less trouble to ingest and work with, AVCHD or HDVtape? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
August 4th, 2010, 11:07 PM
|
#19 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Tape is a non-starter for me. I don't want to sit around nursing a tape machine loading in hours and hours of footage. I can batch transfer AVCHD overnight if need be..
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
|
|
|
August 5th, 2010, 08:08 AM
|
#20 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Port Orange Fl
Posts: 317
|
Not to mention, drop outs. For me was the reason I had to buy a new camera. I import the AVCHD codec, and start to edit. I haven't had time to learn MC5 yet,but I did import some files and played around with it. It worked fine here. I think what I can tell MC5 is one of the best editors on the market. Look at the movies they cut with it.
Dan Forever Moments Video Productions |
|
|
|
|
August 5th, 2010, 08:08 AM
|
#21 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island, NY and Northeast PA
Posts: 132
|
I think at present the choice is best defined by what you do. If you shoot high ratios (documentary, long interviews, nature, etc.) I think the balance still favors tape. You do have to "nurse" the tape machine but you are watching at the same time so are already performing your edit. When you are ingesting clips, particularly if you are transcoding at the same time, the work is lengthy and you are working blind. Doing the initial review is now a completely separate step. This is the real waste of time.
Now if you're shooting from a script or a story board, then it's no contest. Record to cards. The bottleneck is not the media but the hardware and software used in post. I was fooling with a demo version of Edius last night and on an i7 computer it seemed to to deal with AVCHD just fine for projects without too many layers. |
|
|
|
|
August 9th, 2010, 09:18 AM
|
#22 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 42
|
Thanks, very helpful responses.
Yes, I still appreciate tape for long forms. I too does docus, but recently, HDV batch capture is working against me. I just don't have time to troubleshoot. The last project, I was forced to crash record (no TC!). I'm also relieved to hear MC5's direct AVCHD support. I wish to see a screen grab of your settings or even timeline! more power guys! |
|
|
|
|
August 10th, 2010, 04:43 PM
|
#23 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
