|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 12th, 2011, 11:39 PM | #16 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Likewise, there are many reasons why one wants to record compressed RAW or Log-S. If you want to see why Sony has built the F65 fort filmmaking -- watch this video. fxguide | vfx, mograph, and production news It's about the RED Epic, but when it talks about IMAGE QUALITY it says everything Sony would say about why you really want an F65. Except, of course, that the F65 does it better! It seems the F3 may hit a sweet spot the FS100 does not, for me.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
April 13th, 2011, 04:51 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
From the presentations on the Sony's 2K/4K sensor developments
http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/video/chann...rder_training/ PS I watched/listened twice, but couldn't figure out where the current S35 (as per the F3 and FS100) stands in this...
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive Last edited by Piotr Wozniacki; April 14th, 2011 at 02:17 AM. |
April 13th, 2011, 06:38 AM | #18 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
- why "skipped/discarded"? Why not "accumulated"? If you accumulate many tiny "photosites" into a single "pixel", you'll get the high S/N and sensitivity Sony claims... Just a thought, Piotr
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 13th, 2011, 06:04 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monument, CO
Posts: 109
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Could you confirm the HDMI out specs for us. I saw the interview with you on Vimeo where you stated and they later confirmed that it's 4.4.4 but looking at the Sony website it says 4.2.2. Either way I think this will be the camera to beat this year especially when you combine it with an external recorder. |
|
April 13th, 2011, 08:00 PM | #20 |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,444
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Hi Steve,
The HDMI output of the FS100 can either be 4:4:4 8-bit or 4:2:2 8-bit. The external recorder and the camera will shake hands and determine automatically what is the highest possible setting they can share. No need to change any menus. Also, the HDMI output has embedded timecode. Not sure how exactly that will be used right now in the real world. FYI, I could not get the TC to trigger recording on my NanoFlash the way it does with SDI. In the future I'm sure it will. Doug
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
April 14th, 2011, 01:37 AM | #21 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Sony VideON | NEXFS100U Camcorder - Sony Pre-NAB 2011 Training | Most Recent Basically what he is saying is that: - there is no line skipping on the S35 sensor - the S35 sensor's pixel is 4-times larger that that on a DSLR sensor This should answer a lot of doubts presented by Steve, and those created in our minds by the review of BBC's Alan Roberts.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 14th, 2011, 05:07 AM | #22 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monument, CO
Posts: 109
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
|
|
April 14th, 2011, 10:30 AM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mauritius
Posts: 33
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
I find it strange the choice 444 hdmi as there are no recorder for that and none that I have heard planning for it. For the little gain for 99% of shooting of 444 vs 422, a 10 bit output should have been much better and made a whole lot of differences.
|
April 14th, 2011, 03:46 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
(posted on wrong thread)
Last edited by Steve Connor; April 14th, 2011 at 03:49 PM. Reason: Posted on wrong thread! |
April 15th, 2011, 04:27 AM | #25 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Does this mean the F3's HDMI can be 444 as well? Man, Sony is really confusing. Why provide 444 in HDMI when there isn't any hardware that can take advantage of it? I just checked BlackMagic and Aja and everything is 422 YUV over HDMI except a BM Mini Converter which is an HDMI to SDI converter. HOWEVER, even though it can accept 444 RGB over HDMI, it can only output 422 YUV via SDI. |
|
April 15th, 2011, 10:43 AM | #26 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Notes On Video: Sony NEX-FS100 Presentation - Juan Matrinez "We're grossly oversampling for HD, and we're not allowed to say the specification of the sensor, but I can say that we are grossly over-sampling high definition" Hmm....
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 15th, 2011, 04:05 PM | #27 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
- there is no line skipping on the S35 sensor
- the S35 sensor's pixel is 4-times larger that that on a DSLR sensor I'm sure everyone wishes that cleared everything up. But, alas it doesn't. Pretend you are an intern at Sony and told IF you can do the following, you get a job. 1) You can't use the 14MP sensor used in current NEX cameras and camcorders. (This let's us claim the FS100 doesn't use the same chip as the VG10.) You must use the Sony CMOS sensor used in the A55. It is a 16MP chip. It will be used in 2011 NEX cameras. When shooting a 16:9 image, the chip uses 4912 by 2760 pixels -- a total of 13.56MP. 2) You may use the current Bayer filter or you may use a different one. 3) The chip must output a pixel that is "effectively" 4X larger in order to increase performance. 3a) Sensitivity must be increased by 12dB to 18dB. We want an 800ASA sensitivity in the F3. (The VG10 has about a 150ASA to 200ASA sensitivity.) 3b) Noise must be lowered by 6dB to 9dB. 4) In order to run the chip at 60Hz rather than 30Hz, data coming from the chip must be reduced by half. This must be done without skipping or discarding. 5) You must obtain a 3.36MP before debayering. That means 4912 columns must become 2456 -- actually 2444 pixels per line. And, 2760 rows must be reduced to 1380 lines -- actually 1374 lines. 6) You must explain what that pesky BBC guy will find when he tests the F3 or FS100 for aliasing. Before I post how I think this can be done, let's see if others can design the F3/FS100 chip. PS: Bonus points if you can show the chip could be used for a 4K2K VG20. Contest closes on Saturday night.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c Last edited by Steve Mullen; April 15th, 2011 at 05:17 PM. |
April 15th, 2011, 05:30 PM | #28 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
Sorry we can't tell you the chip spec. -- like why? -- but we will tell you we record 2MP and the pre-debayering image is 3.36MP. First, most single chip cameras need about 3.3MP so that after debayering one has 2MP. I've never seen these necessary pixels called "oversampling." Second, I don't know what Juan calls "gross" but I sure don't call 68% (1.68X) gross. Now were a chip to have 6.78X more photosites -- yes, that would be gross. But, depending on how the "reduction" is made, I'm not sure I would call it over-sampling.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c Last edited by Steve Mullen; April 15th, 2011 at 11:06 PM. |
|
April 15th, 2011, 06:31 PM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
Re: FS100 and F3 workshop at NAB
Quote:
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|