|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 21st, 2013, 09:04 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 139
|
FS700 or two FS100s?
The FS100 is now under half the price of an FS700.
I generally film live events and I used to use a wide static B-cam shot while tracking tighter with my A-cam but I hated matching different cameras. Would any of you FS700 users have taken the two FS100 option?
__________________
SONY α77 :: Panasonic X900M :: Sony DSR-PD170P :: Miller DS5 :: Premiere Pro 2.0 :: Cineform NeoScene |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2013, 01:26 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 919
|
Re: FS700 or two FS100s?
All depends on what you are shooting and what features are most important. I've managed without the ND filters, and don't (currently need 4K). The slow-mo would be nice to have, but not a deal breaker for me. I'm happy with the FS-100, but that is because it suits my typical projects (corporate shoots, talking heads, chalk-talks, live performances etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2013, 07:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 139
|
Re: FS700 or two FS100s?
I guess the dealbreaker for me is the performance of the LA-EA2 on both cameras
__________________
SONY α77 :: Panasonic X900M :: Sony DSR-PD170P :: Miller DS5 :: Premiere Pro 2.0 :: Cineform NeoScene |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
