|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 29th, 2003, 01:33 PM | #16 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Why not the TRV70 then or perhaps the JVC GR-DV3000 that does really well in low light compared to the TRV70/80.
It can be had at Buydig.com for $695 |
July 29th, 2003, 01:41 PM | #17 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Yeah. That's a pretty good deal for the older DV3000. I don't think the extra cost for the TRV70 is worth the slight improvement in resolution. However, up here in Canada, the DV3000 costs more than the TRV70---no wonder they can't sell these JVCs up here.
|
July 30th, 2003, 01:54 PM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
Hi guys
I eventually got the TRV80 and the quality of the video is excellent. My cousin has the TRV950 and we did shoot the same scene, in auto mode, for both cameras and compared the two videos taken. I must tell you that there was no difference whats so ever. We had other guys around to ask opinions and they couldn't say whitch camera was the better one. |
July 30th, 2003, 02:09 PM | #19 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
My parents can't tell the difference between VHS and DVD.
Auto mode? Geez.. What kind of TV did you use? Surely you didn't compare LCD side screens.. :) |
July 30th, 2003, 02:38 PM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
Hi
The TV that I have and tested both cameras is the Sony KE-42MR1 http://www.techtronics.com/uk/shop/865-sony-ke-42mr1-plasma-widescreen-tv.html When I say "auto mode" I mean that the exposure and focus were set in automatic setting. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|