Panasonic 953 vs. Sony 950? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion

Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion
...plus TRV900, PD100A and other Sony DV camcorders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 4th, 2004, 12:09 AM   #1
Tourist
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3
Panasonic 953 vs. Sony 950?

I'm really torn between the Panasonic 953 and the Sony 950. This will be my first experience in buying a camcorder and I want something that is going to give me the best overall for my money. I have a six month old daughter and I want to start getting some of her first things on camcorder. I've been in the past getting them on digital film, but want to upgrade to live motion.

I've done a lot of reading on both and everyday I seem to be going back and forth on the two without really getting anywhere. I want a camera that me and my wife will be able to easily handle but at the same time something that will give an overall good quality.

Right now I think I'm leaning toward the Sony today. Only because I read that the Panasonic does not have a hot shoe like the Sony and the Panasonic does not have as many accessories as the Sony. I'm really stuck and probably after doing so more reading, I may be leaning back toward the Panasonic.

I guess my question would be, if both the Panasonic 953 and the Sony 950 were being offered free, which one would be the better overall choice?

Thanks in advance for all the help.
Ed Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2004, 01:15 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 745
The first order of advice will always be to get your hands on and eyes through both camcorders, and shoot a bit and bit more with each to determine which you like better. That said......

You probably will shoot indoors at least as much as out, yes?
Both will shoot marvelous video outdoors, provided you learn the manual controls, of course.
Indoors, the 950 seems to have the edge over the 953 in low light performance, with it's slightly larger, low noise CCDs. To me, if you're going to shoot indoors at all, this makes the 950 worth the extra dollars.

The 950 has a jack for external zoom controllers (LANC). Does the 953? Does this feature matter to you?

I presume you've posted next door, or two doors over, rather :-), at the PV/MX forum?

Shawn
__________________
Breakthrough In Grey Room

Shawn Mielke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2004, 03:17 AM   #3
Outer Circle
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
Quote:
I have a six month old daughter and I want to start getting some of her first things on camcorder.
I assume this means a lot of indoor shooting which also means shooting with indoor lighting. Consider the larger Sony VX2000 or VX2100. If that costs too much money then see if you can get the 1-chip Panasonic PV-DV852. B&H has been blowing them out for under $600---a steal.
Frank Granovski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2004, 01:36 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 265
I can't comment on the Panasonic - yet.
But I've been using the Sony 950 for a year, to shoot video of my soon to be six years old daughter - among other stuff. Here's some of the wisdom I have aquired :
The 950 is not particularly good in low light. But the real problem with indoor (household) lighting - at least in our house - is that the light usually comes from all the wrong directions, leaving my subject in shadow. You need two things to weigh up for this: A good wide-angle add-on lens, so you can squeeze in between the light source and the subject and a small shoe-mount light that will lighten up 2-3 metres in front of the camera.

Sooner or later you will realize that you also need an extra microphone. The built-in stereo mic picks up too much motor, zoom and handling noise for my liking. I use the Sennheiser MK300 in the shoe on the camera. (You're right - I can't use the light then.)

Learn how to use the manual settings - at least for the exposure. You'll thank me once you get around to start editing your different shots together.

Automatic white balance is very reliable but not fool-proof. Mixture of daylight and fluorescent is hard to figure out - even manually.

Sound is excellent - even on auto. The level changes very smoothly.

Colour is great.

Another thing I like about the 950 is that it produces "professional" video but allows me to look like a tourist. That makes it possible to shoot in situations where a larger camera would motivate some people's anxiety.
Tor Salomonsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2004, 01:45 PM   #5
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: norfolk Va.
Posts: 124
Sounds like one of the things you dislike most about the 950 is the low light limitations. With that in mind you need to be looking somewhere other than the 953 as it has less ability in low light than the 950(1/6"CCD's to 1/4.7CCD's). You might need to look into a 3-1/3"CCD cam to get into a better low light ability.
KennJ
__________________
KennJ
Kenn Jolemore is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network